The CMA is investigating whether online gambling companies are treating their customers fairly.
|December 2017||Next investigation update|
|23 June 2017||Update on investigation and enforcement cases opened|
|21 October 2016||Investigation launched|
Enforcement action against online gambling firms
23 June 2017: We are taking enforcement action against several online gambling firms in connection with their gaming promotions for new players, and certain aspects of their free bet promotions, that we believe are breaking consumer protection law. We are especially concerned that gamblers may be losing out because of:
- inadequate or unclear information about the restrictions and conditions that apply to the promotion before sign-up, making it difficult to evaluate whether they should take it up
- restrictions on their right to withdraw winnings made from gameplay with their deposit unless they meet extensive wagering requirements
- potentially unfair rules that restrict certain play strategies, on which firms rely to deny customers a pay-out when they come to claim their winnings
On completion of our enforcement action with the firms, we will work with the Gambling Commission to deliver sector-wide change in the areas of concern identified and will also work together to drive improved compliance with consumer protection law more broadly.
- Press release: CMA launches enforcement action against gambling firms (23.6.17)
Withdrawal amounts: further call for your views
We’ve opened a new line of enquiry to look further into obstacles that people face when they try to withdraw their money after gaming or betting online (whether as part of a promotion or not).
Write to us by email (firstname.lastname@example.org) by 31 August if you have experienced any of the following issues:
- terms preventing players from withdrawing any money they have deposited in their account unless they have wagered its value through in full once, or several times
- requirements for players to take part in publicity or advertising activity for a firm before the player can withdraw their winnings, for example, by posing for a photo with a ‘winner’s cheque’ which is then displayed on the firm’s website
- unreasonably high minimum withdrawal limits, for example, someone might add a £5 deposit but the minimum they can withdraw is £25, so they have to win 5 times their original deposit before they can take out their winnings
- daily, weekly or monthly withdrawal limits that appear unreasonably low, for example, compared to the amount that can be deposited and bet over the same period, so someone might have won £10,000, but can only withdraw £1,000 a week
- terms that place arbitrary deadlines on the time given to players to provide information to verify their identity as a condition of withdrawal
We have also identified concerns with some firms where players do not make a withdrawal or place a bet over a number of weeks or months. In particular, some firms have terms which apply ‘dormancy’ charges to players’ accounts after a period of inactivity, or terms which remove all funds from inactive accounts, regardless of the size of the balance.
If we identify firms who we think are breaking the law in relation to these issues, we will take further enforcement action.
Published: 21 October 2016
Updated: 23 June 2017
Opened: 21 October 2016
- Update on enforcement action added and further call for views on withdrawal amounts.
- Timetable updated.
- Timetable updated.
- Update added.
- First published.