Defence and Security Accelerator: how your proposal is assessed

After you submit a proposal to the Defence and Security Accelerator, it’ll be assessed by subject matter experts. This guidance explains how.

The only way to submit a research proposal to the Defence and Security Accelerator is online.

Your Defence and Security Accelerator proposal will be assessed by experts from Dstl, MOD and sometimes wider UK government using 5 criteria. Detailed guidance of what to include in your proposal to help you perform well against the criteria is provided in each section of your online submission. What we’re looking for in each competition is explained in our competition pages.

We reserve the right to reject a proposal before assessment if it’s outside of the Defence and Security Accelerator’s scope or doesn’t meet minimum requirements. These are described in the guidance in the online submission service, such as being too long, having an obvious lack of scientific evidence or not providing any clear, meaningful deliverables or is a resubmission with no obvious changes to the original proposal. This is to ensure the best use of public money for assessing Defence and Security Accelerator proposals.

For each proposal, a panel of assessors score against each of the criteria, and a moderator then makes a recommendation of whether to fund it or not. This recommendation is then subject to internal peer review before final decisions are made. We also consider relevant programme priorities and value for money to the UK taxpayer when deciding which proposals to fund.

The 5 assessment criteria are as below.

1. Impact on defence and security

We’re looking for clear evidence that your innovation will significantly improve our defence and security capabilities. We’ll consider things like what the innovation will do, who would use it and where, and the potential benefit to UK defence and security.

2. Likelihood of exploitation

We’re looking for evidence that your proposed idea can be developed into a mature, usable product. We’ll consider things like evidence of a sponsor or user buy-in for your idea, your plan for development beyond the project deliverables, and the usability and cost of the final product.

3. Advancing important science and technology

We want to develop important science and technology - and not necessarily just in relation to defence and security. We’ll consider things like whether or not your project will substantially progress science and technology in relation to UK defence and security, and whether it might have uses in other market sectors.

4. Innovation and scientific quality

We’d like to know if the science proposed is innovative and if it’s going to be done to the highest standard. We’ll consider things like how innovative your idea is, if there is evidence provided to show your idea will work and whether there is a clear and structured and logical work plan to describe how you’ll do the work.

5. Technical challenge

Defence and Security Accelerator competitions are designed to make possible exciting and innovative work. The perfect project will be highly challenging with a high potential benefit to UK defence and security. We’ll consider things like whether there’s evidence of ambitious science and technology, measurement of success, risk analysis and rigorous testing. We want clear deliverables that help us to determine whether or not the project has been a success.

After you submit

You’ll be able to track the progress of your application through the submission service on your dashboard. You’ll be notified by email when we’ve made a decision on whether or not to fund your proposal.

If you’re successful, our commercial team will be in touch to get contracting started.

If you’re not successful this time, we’ll give you written feedback to help you understand why. You’ll also see a number in your dashboard for each of the criteria above ranging from 1 for unacceptable to 4 for outstanding.


Please don’t resubmit an idea that’s been unsuccessful in gaining Defence and Security Accelerator funding previously, unless we’ve specifically encouraged a resubmission in our feedback to you.

If you are resubmitting an idea, you need to make it clear where you’ve made changes to address the feedback provided.

If it’s not clear that you’ve made changes to address the feedback, we’ll reject the proposal before assessment. This is to ensure the best use of public money for assessing Defence and Security Accelerator proposals.

Defence and Security Accelerator

Building 5
Porton Down


Please email for the quickest response.

Published 8 December 2016