Annex B: Local authorities with high or very high HIV prevalence (2019)
Updated 21 December 2021
Applies to England
© Crown copyright 2021
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/towards-zero-the-hiv-action-plan-for-england-2022-to-2025/annex-b-local-authorities-with-high-or-very-high-hiv-prevalence-2019
| Area Name | HIV diagnosed prevalence rate / 1,000 aged 15-59 | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lambeth | 13.7 | Very High |
| Southwark | 12.0 | Very High |
| City of London | 11.8 | Very High |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 9.2 | Very High |
| Camden | 8.5 | Very High |
| Westminster | 8.1 | Very High |
| Lewisham | 8.0 | Very High |
| Brighton and Hove | 7.9 | Very High |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 7.7 | Very High |
| Hackney | 7.2 | Very High |
| Islington | 7.1 | Very High |
| Haringey | 6.9 | Very High |
| Greenwich | 6.3 | Very High |
| Manchester | 6.2 | Very High |
| Newham | 5.8 | Very High |
| Croydon | 5.8 | Very High |
| Tower Hamlets | 5.8 | Very High |
| Barking and Dagenham | 5.5 | Very High |
| Wandsworth | 5.4 | Very High |
| Salford | 5.2 | Very High |
| Blackpool | 4.9 | High |
| Waltham Forest | 4.7 | High |
| Brent | 4.6 | High |
| Merton | 4.2 | High |
| Luton | 4.1 | High |
| Enfield | 4.0 | High |
| Leicester | 4.0 | High |
| Ealing | 3.8 | High |
| Hounslow | 3.8 | High |
| Wolverhampton | 3.6 | High |
| Milton Keynes | 3.5 | High |
| Reading | 3.5 | High |
| Coventry | 3.4 | High |
| Slough | 3.4 | High |
| Nottingham | 3.1 | High |
| Southend-on-Sea | 3.1 | High |
| Sandwell | 3.0 | High |
| Barnet | 3.0 | High |
| Bexley | 2.8 | High |
| Leeds | 2.8 | High |
| Redbridge | 2.8 | High |
| Birmingham | 2.8 | High |
| Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole | 2.8 | High |
| Derby | 2.7 | High |
| Hillingdon | 2.6 | High |
| Bedford | 2.6 | High |
| Southampton | 2.6 | High |
| Bristol | 2.6 | High |
| Sutton | 2.5 | High |
| West Northamptonshire | 2.5 | High |
| Richmond upon Thames | 2.5 | High |
| Bromley | 2.4 | High |
| Walsall | 2.4 | High |
| Harrow | 2.3 | High |
| Thurrock | 2.3 | High |
| Peterborough | 2.3 | High |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 2.3 | High |
| Portsmouth | 2.2 | High |
| Liverpool | 2.2 | High |
| Rochdale | 2.2 | High |
| Tameside | 2.2 | High |
| Bury | 2.2 | High |
| Havering | 2.1 | High |
| Bolton | 2.1 | High |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 2.1 | High |
| Trafford | 2.1 | High |
| Torbay | 2.1 | High |
| North Northamptonshire | 2.0 | High |
| Swindon | 2.0 | High |
Figures from the Fingertips website.