Research and analysis

Ofqual literature review of item-level marking in exams

This research from 2014 compares the pros and cons of using item-level marking in exams rather than whole-script marking.


Quality of Marking: Review of Literature on Item-level Marking Research

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.


There is currently limited empirical evidence available to allow a proper comparison of the relative merits of whole-script marking and item-level marking.

However, the limited research carried out to date suggests that item-level marking seems to be at least as reliable as whole-script marking, and under some conditions is likely to be more reliable than whole-script marking.

Specifically, item-level marking may:

  • remove the ‘halo effect’ that means examiners carry forward preconceived ideas about the level of a student’s understanding based on his or her answers to previous unrelated items
  • eliminate the most extreme cases of poor marking reliability, which impact significantly upon public confidence, although it is unlikely to make it more likely that a student will receive the correct grade
  • improve the reliability of marking, particularly for the highest performing students

It is suggested that further research in this area is needed.

Published 14 February 2014