Coronavirus (COVID-19) Guidance and support
  1. Home

Administrative appeals tribunal decisions

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

Find decisions on appeals to the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), including social security and child support appeals.

This includes decisions made from January 2016 onwards. You can find details of decisions made in 2015 or earlier on the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website.

72 decisions

72 decisions

Categorised As

Information rights

  1. Cabinet Office and Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport v Information Commissioner (GIA): [2020] UKUT 140 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus, QC on 23 April 2020.

    • Decided:
  2. Information Commissioner v Moss and the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames: [2020] UKUT 174 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 30 May 2020.

    • Decided:
  3. Gordon v Information Commissioner and Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs: [2020] UKUT 92 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 16 March 2020.

    • Decided:
  4. D v The Information Commissioner: [2018] UKUT 441 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 21 December 2018

    • Decided:
  5. Kirkham v Information Commissioner and UK Research and Innovation (strike out and recusal) [2020] UKUT 93 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 17 March 2020.

    • Decided:
  6. Tony Mason v Information Commissioner and London Borough of Barnet (GIA): [2020] UKUT 56 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus, QC on 19 February 2020.

    • Decided:
  7. Ryan v Information Commissioner: [2020] UKUT 54 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 18 February 2020.

    • Decided:
  8. Lownie v The Information Commissioner, The Foreign and Commonwealth Office and The National Archives (GIA): [2020] UKUT 32 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus on 28 January 2020.

    • Decided:
  9. Leighton v The Information Commissioner (No.2): [2020] UKUT 23 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 17 January 2020.

    • Decided:
  10. Richards v (1) The Information Commissioner (2) The Welsh Government: [2019] UTAAC 379 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Church on 29 November 2019.

    • Decided:
  11. Leighton v The Information Commissioner: [2019] UKUT 378 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Church on 4 December 2019.

    • Decided:
  12. Our Vault Limited v Information Commissioner (GIA): [2019] UKUT 369 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus, QC on 22 November 2019.

    • Decided:
  13. Bennis -v- The Information Commissioner and Stratford-on-Avon District Council:

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wright on 17 October 2019.

    • Decided:
  14. Adedeji v Information Commissioner (GIA): [2019] UKUT 309 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wright on 10 October 2019.

    • Decided:
  15. Brace v Information Commissioner and Merseyside Fire and Rescue Authority: [2019] UKUT 305 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 9 October 2019.

    • Decided:
  16. Ewa Sygulska v (1) The Information Commissioner (2) The Ministry of Defence: [2019] UKUT 269 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge West on 29 August 2019.

    • Decided:
  17. Home Office v Information Commissioner and Cruelty Free International: [2019] UKUT 299 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 30 September 2019.

    • Decided:
  18. Information Commissioner v Malnick and the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments: [2018] UKUT 72 (AAC): [2018] AACR 29

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus, Judge Wikeley and Judge Wright on 1 March 2018.

    • Decided:
  19. Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner and Morland: [2018] UKUT 67 (AAC); [2018] AACR 28

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley, Judge Markus and Judge Wright on 1 March 2018.

    • Decided:
  20. Maurizi v The Information Commissioner and The Crown Prosecution Service (Interested Party: Foreign and Commonwealth Office): [2019] UKUT 262 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Mitchell on 3 September 2019.

    • Decided:
  21. Corderoy and Ahmed v Information Commissioner, Attorney General's Office and Cabinet Office: [2017] UKUT 495 (AAC); [2018] AACR 19

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Mr Justice Charles, Mr Justice Lane and Anne Chafer on 14 December 2017.

    • Decided:
  22. Vesco v (1) Information Commissioner and (2) Government Legal Department: [2019] UKUT 247 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Poole, QC on 1 August 2019.

    • Decided:
  23. Davies v The Information Commissioner; The Cabinet Office (GIA): [2019] UKUT 185 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Mr Justice Nicol, Judge Markus QC and Judge Jones on 11 June 2019.

    • Decided:
  24. Coombs v Information Commissioner and University of Durham: [2019] UKUT 119 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 4 April 2019.

    • Decided:
  25. NHS England v Information Commissioner and Dean: [2019] UKUT 145 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 30 April 2019

    • Decided:
  26. E.ON UK plc v 1. The Information Commissioner; 2. Fish Legal (GIA): [2019] UKUT 132 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus QC on 17 April 2019.

    • Decided:
  27. UKIP v Information Commissioner (information notice): [2019] UKUT 62 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 18 February 2019

    • Decided:
  28. Lampert v Information Commissioner: [2019] UKUT 60 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Lloyd-Davies on 14 February 2019

    • Decided:
  29. O'Hanlon v Information Commissioner: [2019] UKUT 34 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 29 January 2019.

    • Decided:
  30. The Information Commissioner v Halpin: [2019] UKUT 29 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus on 23 January 2019.

    • Decided:
  31. Willow v Information Commissioner and Ministry of Justice: [2016] UKUT 157 (AAC);[2018] AACR 7

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus on 24 March 2016.

    • Decided:
  32. Highways England Company Ltd v Information Commissioner and Henry Manisty: [2018] UKUT 423 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 12 December 2018

    • Decided:
  33. The Cabinet Office v 1.The Information Officer and 2. Webber (GIA): [2018] UKUT 410 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus on 4 December 2018

    • Decided:
  34. Spencer v The Information Commissioner and the Medicine and Health products Regulatory Agency: [2018] UKUT 349 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 22 October 2018

    • Decided:
  35. Department for Education v The Information Commissioner and Whitmey: [2018] UKUT 348 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 22 October 2018

    • Decided:
  36. Kirkham v The Information Commissioner: [2018] UKUT 303 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wright on 14 September 2018.

    • Decided:
  37. Morton v 1. Information Commissioner, 2. Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council: [2018] UKUT 295 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus QC on 10 September 2018.

    • Decided:
  38. The Information Commissioner v Miller: [2018] UKUT 229 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus on 12 July 2018.

    • Decided:
  39. Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner and Ashton: [2018] UKUT 208 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 21 June 2018

    • Decided:
  40. Oxford Phoenix Innovation Limited v The Information Commissioner and The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency: [2018] UKUT 192 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus on 11 June 2018.

    • Decided:
  41. The Information Commissioner v Department for Transport and Hastings: [2018] UKUT 184 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 31 May 2018.

    • Decided:
  42. DfT, DVSA and Porsche Cars GB Limited v Information Commissioner and John Cieslik: [2018] UKUT 127 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus on 12 April 2018.

    • Decided:
  43. Reuben Kirkham v Information Commissioner (Section 12 of FOIA): [2018] UKUT 126 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 11 April 2018.

    • Decided:
  44. Cox v Information Commissioner and Home Office: [2018] UKUT 119 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 6 April 2018.

    • Decided:
  45. Kirkham v Information Commissioner (Recusal and Costs): [2018] UKUT 65 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 1 March 2018.

    • Decided:
  46. Ellis v Information Commissioner and Ryedale District Council: [2017] UKUT 503 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wright on 20 December 2017.

    • Decided:
  47. Kirkham v Information Commissioner: [2018] UKUT 6 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wikeley on 9 January 2018.

    • Decided:
  48. Bryce v Information Commissioner and University of Cambridge: [2017] UKUT 457 (AAC)

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Wright on 23 November 2017.

    • Decided:
  49. Savic v The Information Commissioner and others: [2016] UKUT 535 (AAC); [2017] AACR 26

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Mr Justice Charles on 30 November 2016.

    • Decided:
  50. Savic v The Information Commissioner and others:[2016] UKUT 534 (AAC); [2017] AACR 26

    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Mr Justice Charles on 30 November 2016.

    • Decided: