Skip to main content
Official Statistics

AAA standards report 2025 to 2026

Published 24 September 2026

Applies to England

This data report presents data against each of the 15 screening standards for screening activity related to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening.

The data source used for this report is AAA SMaRT (screening management and referral tracking).

The NHS AAA screening programme  aims to reduce aneurysm-related mortality through early detection, appropriate monitoring and treatment. The NHS AAA screening programme invites men for ultrasound screening during the year (1 April to 31 March) in which they turn 65. Men over 65, who have not previously been screened can self-refer. The programme offers annual or quarterly surveillance for all men who on initial scan are found to have a small or medium aneurysm respectively. Men found to have a large aneurysm are referred into the care of specialised vascular services for potential intervention.

National AAA standards provide a defined set of measures that providers must meet to make sure services are safe and effective. The NHS AAA screening programme published a set of revised standards in April 2020.

This report is an official statistic. Official statistics are an essential public asset. They provide a window on society, the economy, and on the work and performance of government. They are fundamental to the judgements and decisions made by the public, by government, and by a large range of other organisations.

Figures are rounded to one decimal place for presentation purposes. Therefore, some rounded values may appear to meet the threshold when the unrounded value does not.

1. AAA Standards

There are 15 national AAA standards included in this report, which are: 

  * AAA-S01: completeness of offer (initial screen) 

  * AAA-S02: completeness of offer (annual surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S03: completeness of offer (quarterly surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S04: coverage (initial screen) 

  * AAA-S05: coverage (annual surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S06: coverage (quarterly surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S07: coverage of the initial screen in men living in deciles 1 to 3 

  * AAA-S08: uptake (initial screen) 

  * AAA-S09: uptake (annual surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S10: uptake (quarterly surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S11: non-visualised screens 

  * AAA-S12: internal quality assurance 

  * AAA-S13: nurse assessments 

  * AAA-S14: men seen at specialist assessments within 2 weeks 

  * AAA-S15: men operated on within 8 weeks 

Standards data are published annually. Standard AAA-S04, AAA-S05 and AAA-S06 are also key performance indicators (KPIs), which are published quarterly.

Two thresholds, the acceptable threshold and achievable threshold are specified for each standard.

Provider table

Charts in this report display the internal code used by the AAA programme. This table shows the name of the provider associated with each code.

Code Organisation                                             
BBW  Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort             
BCO  Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                       
BLM  Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort
CAM  Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                      
CHM  Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort             
CML  Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort        
COV  Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                
CYH  Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                   
DBY  Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                          
DOW  Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                
ESX  Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                
FRV  Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                         
GLO  Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort              
HAM  Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                           
HFD  Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                       
HOE  Central England AAA Screening Cohort                     
HRW  Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort              
KEN  Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                     
LDN  London AAA Screening Cohort                              
LEI  Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                           
LNC  Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                        
MAN  Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                          
NOE  North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort        
NOR  Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                 
NOT  Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                     
NRH  Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     
NSS  North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort       
PEN  Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                           
SDE  South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                         
SOM  Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort            
STW  Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort       
SYB  South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort       
THV  Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                       
WSR  West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                         
WSU  Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                              
WYO  West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                      
YOH  North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort          

Data are presented by financial year (1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026) unless stated otherwise.

2. AAA-S01: completeness of offer (initial screen)

There were 353,187 men aged 65 eligible for AAA screening between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026; 99.7% of those eligible men were offered an initial screen within the screening year plus 2 months. The reasons for the remaining men not being invited include:

  *   offered after 31 May 2026 

  *   incorrect contact details 

  *   deferring screening 

  * opting out of the screening programme 

  *   not offered 

Figure 1: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 1a: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 99.4%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        99.8%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              99.5%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       99.8%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      100.0%     
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    100.0%     
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              100.0%     
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 99.9%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           100.0%     
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 99.9%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                100.0%     
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          100.0%     
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               99.9%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            99.8%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               99.7%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        99.4%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      99.9%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         100.0%     
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            100.0%     
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         99.6%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               100.0%     
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           99.9%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  99.8%       
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         99.9%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           99.5%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        98.9%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     99.3%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      99.9%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            99.7%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort         98.1%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             99.5%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          99.7%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        99.9%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               99.8%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        98.4%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          99.0%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        100.0%     

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥  95.0% 

  * 12 out of the 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥  99.9% 

  * Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort (98.1%) had the lowest performance but still met the acceptable threshold 

Figure 2: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening according to the standard definition, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2026

The offer of the initial screen to men in each cohort year was stable between 2013/14 and 2019/20 (see previous years’ reports for data prior to 2017/18). Following the sharp drop in 2020/21 performance due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, performance increased year on year. For the last 3 years, 2023/24 (99.8%), 2024/25 (99.8%) and 2025/26 (99.7%), performance has returned to pre-pandemic levels . The AAA screening programme is meeting the acceptable threshold and just below the achievable threshold.

3. AAA-S02: completeness of offer (annual surveillance scan)

Between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026 there were 11,779 annual surveillance appointments due and 11,623 had an offer within 6 weeks either side of their due date (98.7%).

Figure 3: percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 6 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 3a: percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 6 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%     
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        99.5%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              99.5%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       98.3%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      96.8%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    98.9%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              99.4%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  98.6%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           99.4%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 98.6%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                99.8%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          98.9%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               98.6%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            99.5%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               98.7%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        98.5%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      98.9%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         95.9%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            97.2%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         98.9%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               97.5%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           98.5%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  99.4%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         99.3%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           98.7%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        99.6%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     97.6%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      97.9%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            98.4%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        99.0%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             99.6%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          98.5%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        98.3%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               99.0%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        98.7%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          100.0%     
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       98.5%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * 14 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.0% 

  * 2 screening providers, Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort and West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort, offered all surveillance appointments 6 weeks either side of the due date 

  * Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort (95.9%) had the lowest performance but still met the acceptable threshold 

Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments due where an appointment was offered 6 weeks either side of the due date increased from 98.4% in 2024/25 to 98.7% in 2025/26, meeting the acceptable threshold.

4. AAA-S03: completeness of offer (quarterly surveillance scan)

Between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026 there were 11,301 quarterly surveillance appointments due and 11,158 had an offer within 4 weeks either side of their due date (98.7%).

Figure 4: percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 4 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 4a: percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 4 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 99.4%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        100.0%     
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              99.5%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       99.3%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      98.8%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    99.5%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              99.6%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 98.4%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           99.5%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 99.3%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                99.7%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          99.0%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               99.6%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            99.8%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               98.7%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        99.2%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       94.3%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         94.1%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            98.9%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         98.3%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               97.7%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           97.6%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  99.7%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         99.6%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           98.2%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        100.0%     
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     98.1%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      100.0%     
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            98.0%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        99.2%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             99.3%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          99.4%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        98.5%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               98.3%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        99.7%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          99.1%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       97.3%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 35 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * 21 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.0% 

  * 3 screening providers, Black Country AAA Screening Cohort, North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort and Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort, offered all appointments 4 weeks either side of the due date 

  * Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort (94.1%) had the lowest performance and did not meet the acceptable threshold 

Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments due where an appointment was offered 4 weeks either side of the due date has remained at 98.7% for 2024/25 and 2025/26, meeting the acceptable threshold.

5. AAA-S04: coverage (initial screen)

Of the 353,187 men aged 65 eligible for AAA screening between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026; 82.2% of those eligible men were conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months.

Figure 5: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 5a: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 80.6%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        81.1%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              83.7%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       85.0%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      75.9%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    84.8%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              79.4%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 83.0%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           87.7%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 86.1%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                83.0%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          87.4%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                86.2%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            84.7%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               85.3%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        83.3%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      83.6%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         79.1%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            85.3%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          85.0%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               76.9%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           84.3%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  80.5%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         82.0%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           80.1%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        81.9%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     79.6%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      85.9%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            88.0%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        83.7%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             86.4%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          88.5%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        84.3%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               83.0%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        80.9%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          83.2%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       80.5%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0% 

  * 11 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0% 

  * South Devon AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (88.5%) 

  * Central England AAA Screening Cohort (75.9%) had the lowest performance but still met the acceptable threshold 

Figure 6: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested according to the standard definition, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2026

Following the decrease in performance in 2020/21, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, performance has increased to 82.2% in 2024/25 and maintained 82.2% in 2025/26, meeting the acceptable threshold but not meeting the achievable threshold.

6. AAA-S05: coverage (annual surveillance scan)

Of the 11,779 annual surveillance appointments due between 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026, 91.9% had a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date.

Figure 7: coverage - percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 7a: coverage - percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 89.9%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        97.3%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              92.6%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       93.5%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      90.6%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    92.3%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              92.9%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 92.3%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           93.9%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 93.1%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                91.1%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          90.4%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               94.2%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            94.7%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               94.6%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        90.9%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      89.0%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         85.6%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            93.9%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         95.9%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                                83.6%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           92.8%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  93.5%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         95.2%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           93.9%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        91.8%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     87.5%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      92.7%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            93.6%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        91.5%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             94.7%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          90.2%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        93.6%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               91.9%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        95.0%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          94.0%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       90.5%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 36 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 85.0% 

  * 3 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * Black Country AAA Screening Cohort (97.3%) had the highest performance 

  * London AAA Screening Cohort (83.6%) had the lowest performance and did not meet the acceptable threshold 

Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments due that had a conclusive test 6 weeks either side of the due date decreased by from 92.3% in 2024/25 to 91.9% in 2025/26, meeting the acceptable threshold. 

7. AAA-S06: coverage (quarterly surveillance scan)

Of the 11,301 quarterly surveillance appointments due between 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026, 92.9% had a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date.

Figure 8: coverage- percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 8a: coverage - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 94.3%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        98.8%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              91.9%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       93.2%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      91.2%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    95.3%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              93.9%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 95.3%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           94.8%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 95.1%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                93.7%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          96.4%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               92.3%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            95.7%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               89.7%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        94.5%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      84.6%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         87.0%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            92.0%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         94.5%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               85.9%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           91.9%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  97.3%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         95.1%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           93.9%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        94.7%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     91.1%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      95.0%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            92.8%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        93.2%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             90.4%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           95.5%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        94.2%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               93.1%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        93.7%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          94.3%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       89.0%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 32 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0% 

  * 9 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * Black Country AAA Screening Cohort (98.8%) had the highest performance 

  * Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort (84.6%) had the lowest performance and did not meet the acceptable threshold 

Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments due that had a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date decreased from 93.3% in 2024/25 to 92.9% in 2025/26, meeting the acceptable threshold.

8. AAA-S07: coverage of the initial screen in men living in deciles 1 to 3

Nationally for 2025/26 the percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019 was 75.4%. This contrasts with  82.2% for the overall cohort.

Figure 9: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 9a: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 70.9%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        76.6%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              75.0%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       77.3%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      68.5%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    79.3%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              73.4%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 74.6%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           81.7%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 73.4%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                75.5%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          81.4%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               77.8%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            75.4%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               75.6%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        79.2%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      78.6%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         71.5%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            73.9%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         81.2%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               72.7%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           79.8%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  71.5%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         76.5%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           72.0%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        73.6%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     73.0%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      79.8%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            85.3%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        73.9%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             77.9%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          82.8%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        79.6%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               75.7%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        72.0%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          76.4%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       71.9%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 22 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0% 

  * 1 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0% 

  * Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort (85.3%) had the highest performance 

  * Central England AAA Screening Cohort (68.5%) had the lowest performance and did not meet the acceptable threshold 

Figure 10: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, England, 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2026

Men living in more deprived areas are less likely to attend for screening but are more likely to have an aneurysm. It is important for providers to engage with men living in more deprived areas to make sure they can make a personal informed choice.

This standard should be reviewed alongside standard 4. It was first introduced in April 2020, however performance during 2020/2021 was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Performance has increased year on year and this is the second consecutive year that the acceptable threshold has been met nationally.

9. AAA-S08: uptake (initial screen)

There were 352,227 men offered AAA screening between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026; 82.4% of those men offered an initial screen were conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months.

Figure 11: uptake - percentage of eligible men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 11a: uptake - percentage of eligible men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 81.1%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        81.3%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              84.1%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       85.1%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      75.9%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    84.8%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              79.4%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 83.1%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           87.7%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 86.2%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                83.0%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          87.5%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               86.3%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            84.8%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               85.6%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        83.8%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      83.6%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         79.1%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            85.3%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         85.4%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               77.0%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           84.4%       
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  80.6%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         82.1%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           80.6%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        82.8%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     80.2%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      86.0%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             88.3%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        85.3%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             86.9%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          88.8%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        84.4%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               83.1%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        82.2%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           84.0%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       80.5%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0% 

  * 13 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0% 

  * South Devon AAA Screening Cohort (88.8%) had the highest performance 

  * Central England AAA Screening Cohort (75.9%) had the lowest performance but still met the acceptable threshold 

Figure 12: uptake - percentage of men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the initial screening year plus 2 months, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2026

The percentage of men offered screening who were conclusively tested has remained above the acceptable threshold. It has been above 82% for 3 years; 2023/24 (82.1%), 2024/25 (82.3%) and 2025/26 (82.4%).

10. AAA-S09: uptake (annual surveillance scan)

Of the 11,623 annual surveillance appointments that were offered within 6 weeks either side of the due date, 93.1% had a conclusive test within the 6 weeks between 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026.

Figure 13: uptake - percentage of annual surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 13a: uptake - percentage of annual surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 89.9%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        97.7%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              93.0%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       95.1%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      93.6%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    93.3%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              93.5%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 93.6%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           94.5%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 94.4%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                91.3%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          91.3%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               95.6%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            95.2%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               95.9%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        92.3%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      90.0%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         89.2%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            96.6%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         97.0%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               85.7%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           94.2%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  94.1%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         95.8%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           95.1%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        92.1%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     89.6%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      94.7%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            95.1%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        92.4%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             95.1%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          91.6%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        95.3%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               92.8%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        96.2%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          94.0%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        91.8%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 33 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0% 

  * 13 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * Black Country AAA Screening Cohort (97.7%) had the highest performance 

  * London AAA Screening Cohort (85.7%) had the lowest performance and did not meet the acceptable threshold 

Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments offered where there was a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date has been above the acceptable threshold since 2021/22. It has been just above 93% since 2021/22; 93.1% in 2025/26.

11. AAA-S10: uptake (quarterly surveillance scan)

Of the 11,158 quarterly surveillance appointments offered within 4 weeks either side of the due date, 94.1% had a conclusive test within the 4 weeks between 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026.

Figure 14: uptake - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 14a: uptake - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 94.9%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        98.8%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              92.3%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       93.9%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      92.4%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    95.9%       
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              94.3%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 96.8%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           95.3%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 95.8%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                93.9%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          97.4%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                92.7%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            96.0%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               90.9%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        95.3%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      89.7%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         92.4%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            93.1%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          96.1%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               87.9%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           94.2%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  97.6%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         95.4%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           95.6%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        94.7%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     92.9%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      95.0%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            94.7%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        93.9%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             91.0%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          96.1%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        95.7%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               94.7%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        94.0%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          95.2%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       91.5%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 35 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0% 

  * 15 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * Black Country AAA Screening Cohort (98.8%) had the highest performance 

  * London AAA Screening Cohort (87.9%) had the lowest performance and did not meet the acceptable threshold 

Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there was a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date decreased by 0.4 percentage points from 2024/25 (94.5%) to 2025/26 (94.1%), continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.

12. AAA-S11: non-visualised screens

Screening providers should aim to minimise the percentage of screens that cannot be visualised. Therefore, the lower the value the better for this standard. Nationally 1.0%  of cohort screens were non-visualised in 2025/26.

Figure 15: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 15a: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 0.5%       
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        0.7%       
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              1.5%       
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        1.3%       
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      0.4%       
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    0.2%       
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              1.3%       
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 1.9%       
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           0.3%       
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 2.0%       
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 1.6%       
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          0.2%       
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               0.5%       
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            0.6%       
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               2.6%       
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        0.4%       
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      0.7%       
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         1.0%       
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            0.4%       
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         0.6%       
London AAA Screening Cohort                               1.1%       
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           2.2%       
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  0.4%       
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         0.1%       
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           0.5%       
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        0.4%       
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     1.1%       
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      1.0%       
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            0.5%       
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        1.2%       
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             0.5%       
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          1.6%       
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        0.5%       
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               0.8%       
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        0.8%       
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          1.2%       
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       2.8%       

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≤ 3.0% 

  * 22 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≤ 1.0% 

  * North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort (0.1%) had the lowest non-visualisation rate 

  * West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort (2.8%) had the highest non-visualisation rate but still met the acceptable threshold 

Figure 16: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2026

The percentage of non-visualised screens is stable across England over the series. For 2025/26, national performance 1.0% met both the acceptable and achievable thresholds.

13. AAA-S12: internal quality assurance

Of the 1,888 men with a small or medium size aneurysm (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm), 89.7% had their screens reviewed within 21 days of the scan taking place in 2025/26.

Figure 17: test - percentage of abnormal screens (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) reviewed within 21 calendar days of the initial screen date, by provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 17a: test - percentage of abnormal screens (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) reviewed within 21 calendar days of the initial screen date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 85.3%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        90.9%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              85.0%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       97.2%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      87.8%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    94.6%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              98.8%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 58.3%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           98.4%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 100.0%     
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                98.6%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          100.0%     
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               100.0%     
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            100.0%     
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               100.0%     
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        97.4%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      68.6%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         100.0%     
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            100.0%     
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          100.0%     
London AAA Screening Cohort                               83.2%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           89.0%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  97.1%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         42.3%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           100.0%     
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        77.8%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     76.5%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      91.3%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            88.0%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        95.2%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             82.9%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          96.3%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        100.0%     
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               96.6%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        98.4%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          100.0%     
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       95.8%      

The overall England performance of 89.7% met the acceptable threshold but did not meet the achievable threshold. 

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 35 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 60.0% 

  * 22 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * 11 screening providers reviewed all screens within 21 days of the scan taking place :  

    - Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 

    - North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 

    - South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 

    - West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 

  * North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort (42.3%) had the lowest performance and did not meet the acceptable threshold 

Nationally the proportion of men with a small or medium size aneurysm (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) that had their screens reviewed within 21 days of the scan taking place increased from 2024/25 (84.6%) to 2025/26 (89.7%) remaining above the acceptable threshold.

14. AAA-S13: nurse assessments

Of the 2,795 men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan, 75.6% had a nurse assessment within 12 weeks of their conclusive scan in 2025/26.

Figure 18: test - percentage of men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan who had a nurse assessment ≤ 12 weeks of their conclusive scan, by provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 18a: test - percentage of men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan who had a nurse assessment ≤ 12 weeks of their conclusive scan, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 74.4%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        91.7%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              46.3%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       71.9%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      72.0%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    59.0%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              84.8%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 93.8       
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           91.7%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 83.9%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                80.2%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          28.8%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               75.0%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            82.7%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                54.9%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        67.9%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      92.2%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         88.0%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            96.8%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         75.4%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               73.8%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            76.7%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  86.0%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         97.0%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           53.7%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        64.2%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     64.3%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      84.4%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             68.8%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        59.5%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             80.3%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          58.8%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        80.0%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               63.4%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        50.0%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          68.0%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       89.1%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 35 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 50.0% 

  * 16 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 80.0% 

  * North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort (97.0%) had the highest performance 

  * Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort (28.8%) had the lowest performance and did not meet the acceptable threshold 

Nationally the proportion of men eligible for a nurse assessment who attended an appointment decreased from 2024/25 (79.9%) to 2025/26 (75.6%), meeting the acceptable threshold but below the achievable threshold.

15. AAA-S14: men seen at specialist assessments within 2 weeks

Of the 869 men with an aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, 91.8% were seen by a vascular surgeon within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan in 2025/26.

Figure 19: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, seen by vascular surgeon within 2 weeks, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 19a: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, seen by vascular surgeon within 2 weeks, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 63.2%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        100.0%     
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              100.0%     
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       100.0%     
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      76.5%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    96.6%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              94.7%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 88.9%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           96.8%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 92.6%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                85.0%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          88.2%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               95.7%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            89.2%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               100.0%     
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        94.7%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      92.3%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         97.6%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                            86.4%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         100.0%     
London AAA Screening Cohort                               83.0%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           94.4%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  82.4%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         95.1%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           100.0%     
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        93.3%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     93.8%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      79.3%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            91.7%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        100.0%     
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             95.8%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          93.1%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        100.0%     
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               96.2%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        94.7%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          100.0%     
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       91.7%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 27 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0% 

  * 16 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * 9 screening providers saw all men for a specialist assessment within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan :  

    - Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 

    - North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 

    - Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 

    - South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 

    - West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 

  * Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort (63.2%) had the lowest performance and did not meet the acceptable threshold 

Nationally the percentage of men seen for a specialist assessment within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan decreased by 0.9 percentage points from 2024/25 (92.7%) to 2025/26 (91.8%), continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.

16. AAA-S15: men operated on within 8 weeks

Of the 685 men with an aorta of ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining 29.6% were operated on by a vascular surgeon within 8 weeks.

Figure 20: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular surgeon within 8 weeks, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026

Figure 20a: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular surgeon within 8 weeks, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 17.6%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                        66.7%      
Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              0.0%       
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                       90.0%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                      16.7%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                    4.3%       
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort              29.4%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                 66.7%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                           25.0%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                 13.0%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                22.2%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                          6.3%       
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort               50.0%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                            15.8%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort               26.3%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                        52.6%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                      30.0%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         11.4%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             12.5%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                         50.0%      
London AAA Screening Cohort                               20.9%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                           26.5%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                  69.2%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort         44.1%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort           17.4%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort        16.7%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                     21.4%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                      40.0%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                            41.2%      
Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        22.2%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort             37.5%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                          56.3%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort        16.7%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                               7.1%       
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                        61.1%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                          27.3%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                       63.6%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 6 out of 37 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 60.0% 

  * 1 out of 37 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 80.0% 

  * Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort (90.0%) had the highest performance 

  * Bristol Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort (0.0%) had the lowest performance with no men operated on within 8 weeks 

Figure 21: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular surgeon within 8 weeks, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2026

The percentage of men operated on within 8 weeks fell to 38.5% in 2019/20 and to a low of 24.1% in 2020/21 during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was above 30% for 3 years; 2022/23 (30.1%), 2023/24 (31.6%) and 2024/25 (31.7%), but has dropped to 29.6% in 2025/26, considerably below the acceptable threshold.

17. Outcomes

The number of fatal and non-fatal AAA ruptures presented are only those reported to the screening provider and will only be for those men who have been screened. This number may, therefore, be an underestimate of the true number of AAA ruptures.

There were 31 AAA ruptures reported during the screening year, 24 of which were fatal. 11 of the 24 deaths were in men on surveillance. 13 of the 24 deaths were in men who had been referred for surgery.

The 11 fatal AAA ruptures in men on surveillance represented 2.1% of the 532 deaths in men on surveillance.

For the men referred to surgery, 5 had been turned down or had declined the operation and 8 died while waiting for surgery. Of the 8 who died while waiting for surgery, 6 died after waiting more than 8 weeks for surgery.

In the previous year, 2024/25, 6 men died while waiting for surgery, 5 of whom died after waiting more than 8 weeks from their referral.