AAA standards report 2024 to 2025
Published 25 September 2025
Applies to England
This data report presents data against each of the 15 screening standards for screening activity related to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening.
The data source used for this report is AAA SMaRT (screening management and referral tracking).
The NHS AAA screening programme aims to reduce aneurysm-related mortality through early detection, appropriate monitoring and treatment. The NHS AAA screening programme invites men for ultrasound screening during the year (1 April to 31 March) in which they turn 65. Men over 65, who have not previously been screened can self-refer. The programme offers annual or quarterly surveillance for all men who on initial scan are found to have a small or medium aneurysm respectively. Men found to have a large aneurysm are referred into the care of specialised vascular services for potential intervention.
National AAA standards provide a defined set of measures that providers must meet to make sure services are safe and effective. The NHS AAA screening programme published a set of revised standards in April 2020.
This report is an official statistic. Official statistics are an essential public asset. They provide a window on society, the economy, and on the work and performance of government. They are fundamental to the judgements and decisions made by the public, by government, and by a large range of other organisations.
AAA Standards
There are 15 national AAA standards included in this report, which are:
* AAA-S01: completeness of offer (initial screen)
* AAA-S02: completeness of offer (annual surveillance scan)
* AAA-S03: completeness of offer (quarterly surveillance scan)
* AAA-S04: coverage (initial screen)
* AAA-S05: coverage (annual surveillance scan)
* AAA-S06: coverage (quarterly surveillance scan)
* AAA-S07: coverage of the initial screen in men living in deciles 1 to 3
* AAA-S08: uptake (initial screen)
* AAA-S09: uptake (annual surveillance scan)
* AAA-S10: uptake (quarterly surveillance scan)
* AAA-S11: non-visualised screens
* AAA-S12: internal quality assurance
* AAA-S13: nurse assessments
* AAA-S14: men seen at specialist assessments within 2 weeks
* AAA-S15: men operated on within 8 weeks
Standards data are published annually. Standard AAA-S04, AAA-S05 and AAA-S06 are also key performance indicators (KPIs), which are published quarterly.
Two thresholds, the acceptable threshold and achievable threshold are specified for each standard.
1. Provider table
Charts in this report display the internal code used by the AAA programme. This table shows the name of the provider associated with each code.
Code | Provider | Region |
---|---|---|
BBW | Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | South West |
BCO | Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
BLM | Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | East of England |
CAM | Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | East of England |
CHM | Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | North West |
CML | Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | North West |
COV | Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
CYH | Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | North East and Yorkshire |
DBY | Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
DOW | Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | South West |
ESX | Essex AAA Screening Cohort | East of England |
FRV | Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | East of England |
GLO | Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | South West |
HAM | Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | South East |
HFD | Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | East of England |
HOE | Central England AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
HRW | Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
KEN | Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | South East |
LEI | Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
LNC | Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
MAN | Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | North West |
NOE | North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | North East and Yorkshire |
NOL | North London AAA Screening Cohort | London |
NOR | Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | East of England |
NOT | Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
NRH | Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
NSS | North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
PEN | Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | South West |
SDE | South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | South West |
SOM | Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | South West |
STW | Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | Midlands |
SWL | South London AAA Screening Cohort | London |
SYB | South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | North East and Yorkshire |
THV | Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | South East |
WSR | West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | South East |
WSU | Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | South East |
WYO | West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | North East and Yorkshire |
YOH | North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | North East and Yorkshire |
Data are presented by financial year (1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025) unless stated otherwise.
2. AAA-S01: completeness of offer (initial screen)
There were 337,752 men aged 65 eligible for AAA screening between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025; 99.8% of those eligible men were offered an initial screen within the screening year plus 2 months. The reasons for not being invited include:
* offered after 31 May 2025
* incorrect contact details
* deferring screening
* opting out of the screening programme
* not offered
Figure 1: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 1a: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 99.5% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.8% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 99.8% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.2% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 99.6% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 99.8% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 99.7% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.1% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 98.8% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 99.6% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.9% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
* 26 out of the 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.9%
* Only 1 screening provider Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort (98.8%) did not reach 99% but this still meets the acceptable threshold
Figure 2: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening according to the standard definition, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025
The offer of the initial screen to men in each cohort year was stable between 2013/14 and 2019/20 (see previous years’ reports for data prior to 2017/18). Following the sharp drop in 2020/21 performance due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, performance increased year on year until 2023/24 (99.8%) maintaining this level in 2024/25 (99.8%). The AAA screening programme is meeting the acceptable threshold and just below the achievable threshold, returning to pre-pandemic levels.
3. AAA-S02: completeness of offer (annual surveillance scan)
Between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025 there were 12,190 annual surveillance appointments due and 11,995 had an offer within 6 weeks either side of their due date (98.4%).
Figure 3: percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 6 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 3a: percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 6 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 98.4% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 97.8% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 99.5% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 98.0% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 96.3% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.0% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 98.4% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 99.7% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 99.7% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 98.1% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 97.3% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.3% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 98.5% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 95.3% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 99.5% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.3% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 97.5% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 99.7% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 98.7% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 98.1% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 99.0% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.3% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 98.2% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.7% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 98.6% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 97.4% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 99.1% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 96.8% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 99.6% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 98.4% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 95.3% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 97.9% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.9% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
* 16 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.0%
* 5 screening providers, Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort, Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort, Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort, Essex AAA Screening Cohort and Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort offered all surveillance appointments 6 weeks either side of the due date
* Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort (95.3%) had the lowest performance but still met the acceptable threshold
Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments due where an appointment was offered 6 weeks either side of the due date has remained at 98.4% for 2023/24 and 2024/25, meeting the acceptable threshold.
4. AAA-S03: completeness of offer (quarterly surveillance scan)
Between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025 there were 11,324 quarterly surveillance appointments due and 11,179 had an offer within 4 weeks either side of their due date (98.7%).
Figure 4: percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 4 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 4a: percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 4 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 99.4% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 99.4% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 99.0% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 98.4% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.7% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 97.5% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 99.6% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 98.5% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 98.8% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 97.4% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 99.1% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 98.8% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 97.2% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.1% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 98.1% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 97.3% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 96.9% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 98.8% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 98.5% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 99.7% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 99.4% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 98.7% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 99.8% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 98.9% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 99.1% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 98.9% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 99.3% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 99.3% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 97.2% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 97.4% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 99.6% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 99.4% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 95.8% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 99.5% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 94.9% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* 37 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
* 18 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.0%
* 3 screening providers, Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort, Essex AAA Screening Cohort and North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort, offered all appointments 4 weeks either side of the due date
* West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort (94.9%) had the lowest performance and were the only service to not meet the acceptable threshold
Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments due where an appointment was offered 4 weeks either side of the due date increased from 2023/24 (98.6%) to 2024/25 (98.7%), meeting the acceptable threshold.
5. AAA-S04: coverage (initial screen)
Of the 338,344 men aged 65 eligible for AAA screening between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025; 82.2% of those eligible men were conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months.
Figure 5: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 5a: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 80.2% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 82.8% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 83.1% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 86.8% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 76.9% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 82.1% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 80.4% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 83.1% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 87.6% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 87.8% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 82.8% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 86.3% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 84.8% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 85.4% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 86.1% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 82.3% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 85.0% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 79.4% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 85.0% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 86.8% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 79.6% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 81.9% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 82.5% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 75.1% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 81.6% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 80.8% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 85.0% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 87.1% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 88.7% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 87.6% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 87.5% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 89.7% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 77.6% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 83.9% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 83.2% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 81.5% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 80.0% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 81.1% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0%
* 13 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0%
* South Devon AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (89.7%)
* North London AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (75.1%), but still met the acceptable threshold
Figure 6: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested according to the standard definition, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025
Following the decrease in performance in 2020/21, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, performance has continued to increase year on year to 2024/25, meeting the acceptable threshold and exceeding the levels seen pre-pandemic.
6. AAA-S05: coverage (annual surveillance scan)
Of the 12,190 annual surveillance appointments due between 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025, 92.3% had a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date.
Figure 7: coverage - percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 7a: coverage - percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 94.1% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 94.8% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 93.5% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 94.9% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 88.5% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 95.1% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 92.6% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 96.8% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 93.7% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.5% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 93.0% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 96.2% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 93.4% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 90.9% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 95.1% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 93.4% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 91.5% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 88.1% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 91.7% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.2% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 89.7% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 96.0% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 94.3% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 86.7% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 93.3% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 92.4% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 88.8% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 94.8% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 93.9% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 87.9% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 92.9% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 90.8% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 87.6% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 93.1% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 92.4% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 86.1% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 89.9% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 92.3% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 85.0%
* 7 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
* Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort (96.8%) had the highest performance
* Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort (86.1%) had the lowest performance, but still met the acceptable threshold
Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments due that had a conclusive test 6 weeks either side of the due date increased by 0.7 percentage points from 2023/24 (91.6%) to 2024/25 (92.3%), meeting the acceptable threshold.
7. AAA-S06: coverage (quarterly surveillance scan)
Of the 11,324 quarterly surveillance appointments due between 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025, 93.3% had a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date.
Figure 8: coverage- percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 8a: coverage - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 94.2% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 96.9% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 95.9% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.3% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 88.5% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 95.5% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 91.6% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 92.6% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 93.6% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.2% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 95.6% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 95.4% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 94.9% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 93.5% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 90.0% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.2% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 92.9% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 90.0% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 91.2% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.0% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 89.4% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 94.8% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 96.7% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 90.7% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 93.6% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 92.2% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 90.1% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.3% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 95.8% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 94.5% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 91.3% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 91.9% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 84.4% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 96.1% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 95.8% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 88.8% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 93.5% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 91.0% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* 34 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0%
* 14 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
* Black Country AAA Screening Cohort (96.9%) had the highest performance
* South London AAA Screening Cohort (84.4%) had the lowest performance
* 4 screening providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:
- Manchester AAA Screening Cohort (89.4%)
- Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort (88.8%)
- Central England AAA Screening Cohort (88.5%)
- South London AAA Screening Cohort (84.4%)
Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments due that had a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date increased from 2023/24 (92.8%) to 2024/25 (93.3%), meeting the acceptable threshold.
8. AAA-S07: coverage of the initial screen in men living in deciles 1 to 3
Nationally for 2024/25 the percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019 was 75.0%. This contrasts with 82.2% for the overall cohort.
Figure 9: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 9a: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 68.0% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 78.1% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 71.5% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 79.9% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 69.9% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 76.0% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 74.1% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 74.8% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 80.8% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 80.0% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 74.7% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 79.6% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 74.2% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 78.1% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 78.4% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 73.8% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 77.8% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 71.0% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 76.8% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 82.3% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 73.9% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 74.0% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 76.5% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 73.0% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 72.5% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 73.3% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 75.9% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 80.2% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 85.3% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 78.4% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 80.5% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 85.5% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 71.0% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 79.2% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 75.3% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 67.2% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 75.4% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 74.4% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* 21 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0%
* 2 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0%
* South Devon AAA Screening Cohort (85.5%) had the highest performance and Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort (85.3%) also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0%
* Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort (67.2%) had the lowest performance
Figure 10: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, England, 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2025
Men living in more deprived areas are less likely to attend for screening but are more likely to have an aneurysm. It is important for providers to engage with men living in more deprived areas to make sure they can make a personal informed choice.
This standard is now in the fifth year of being reported and it should be reviewed alongside standard 4. It was first introduced in April 2020, however performance during 2020/2021 was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Performance has increased year on year and this is the first year that the acceptable threshold has been met.
9. AAA-S08: uptake (initial screen)
There were 337,752 men offered AAA screening between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025; 82.3% of those men offered an initial screen were conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months.
Figure 11: uptake - percentage of eligible men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 11a: uptake - percentage of eligible men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 80.6% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 82.9% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 83.2% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 86.9% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 77.0% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 82.1% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 80.5% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 83.2% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 87.7% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 87.9% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 82.9% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 86.4% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 84.8% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 85.5% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 86.2% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 83.0% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 85.1% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 79.4% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 85.0% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 86.9% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 79.9% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 82.1% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 82.5% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 75.1% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 81.9% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 81.6% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 85.0% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 87.2% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 88.7% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 87.7% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 87.5% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 89.7% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 77.6% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 83.9% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 83.3% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 82.4% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 80.3% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 81.2% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0%
* 15 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0%
* South Devon AAA Screening Cohort (89.7%) had the highest performance
* North London AAA Screening Cohort (75.1%) had the lowest performance, but still met the acceptable threshold
Figure 12: uptake - percentage of men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the initial screening year plus 2 months, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025
The percentage of men offered screening who were conclusively tested has remained above the acceptable threshold including throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. It has been above 80% for 3 years; 2022/23 (80.8%) to 2023/24 (82.1%) to 2024/25 (82.3%).
10. AAA-S09: uptake (annual surveillance scan)
Of the 11,995 annual surveillance appointments that were offered within 6 weeks either side of the due date, 93.8% had a conclusive test within the 6 weeks between 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.
Figure 13: uptake - percentage of annual surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 13a: uptake - percentage of annual surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 95.6% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 96.9% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 94.0% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.8% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 91.9% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.1% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 94.1% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 96.8% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 93.7% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.5% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 93.0% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 96.6% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 93.8% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 92.7% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 97.7% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.0% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 92.9% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 92.5% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 92.2% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.9% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 92.0% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 96.3% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 95.6% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 88.4% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 94.3% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 93.0% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 90.4% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.0% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 95.3% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 90.3% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 92.9% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 91.7% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 90.5% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 93.5% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 93.9% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 90.4% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 91.8% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 94.2% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* 37 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0%
* 14 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
* Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort (97.7%) had the highest performance
* North London AAA Screening Cohort (88.4%) had the lowest performance and were the only service to not meet the acceptable threshold
Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments offered where there was a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date has been above the acceptable threshold since 2021/22. It has been just above 93% since 2021/22 rising to 93.8% in 2024/25.
11. AAA-S10: uptake (quarterly surveillance scan)
Of the 11,179 quarterly surveillance appointments offered within 4 weeks either side of the due date, 94.5% had a conclusive test within the 4 weeks between 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.
Figure 14: uptake - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 14a: uptake - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 94.8% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 97.5% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 96.9% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.3% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 89.9% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 95.8% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 93.9% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 92.9% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 95.0% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.3% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 95.6% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 97.9% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 95.7% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 94.6% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 92.6% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.1% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 94.6% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 92.5% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 94.2% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.1% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 90.7% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 95.1% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 97.3% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 91.9% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 93.8% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 92.2% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 91.1% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.2% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 96.9% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 95.2% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 91.9% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 94.5% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 86.7% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 96.4% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 96.3% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 92.7% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 94.0% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 95.9% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* 36 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0%
* 18 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
* Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort (97.9%) had the highest performance
* South London AAA Screening Cohort (86.7%) had the lowest performance
* 2 screening providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:
- Central England AAA Screening Cohort (89.9%)
- South London AAA Screening Cohort (86.7%)
Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there was a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date increased by 0.3 percentage points from 2023/24 (94.2%) to 2024/25 (94.5%), continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.
12. AAA-S11: non-visualised screens
Screening providers should aim to minimise the percentage of screens that cannot be visualised. Therefore, the lower the value the better for this standard. Nationally 1.0% of cohort screens were non-visualised in 2024/25.
Figure 15: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 15a: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 1.2% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 0.5% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 1.4% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 1.4% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 0.2% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 0.3% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 1.8% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 1.8% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 0.4% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 1.2% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 2.4% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 0.4% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 0.4% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 0.7% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 1.8% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 0.7% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 0.5% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 0.9% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 0.3% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 1.1% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 2.7% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 0.3% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 0.0% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 0.7% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 0.5% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 0.3% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 1.2% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 1.0% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 0.8% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 1.7% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 0.7% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 1.1% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 2.0% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 0.6% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 1.2% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 1.0% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 1.3% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 2.9% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≤ 3.0%
* 19 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≤ 1.0%
* North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort (0.0%) had the lowest performance (lower the value the better)
* West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort (2.9%) had the highest performance (lower the value the better) but still met the acceptable threshold
Figure 16: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025
The percentage of non-visualised screens is stable across England over the series. For 2024/25, national performance was reported as 1.0% when rounded to one decimal place, but the actual value was slightly above 1.0%, meeting the acceptable but not the achievable threshold. Two providers in the above table reported 1.0% but the actual value was slightly above 1.0%, meeting the acceptable but not the achievable threshold.
13. AAA-S12: internal quality assurance
Of the 1,895 men with a small or medium size aneurysm (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm), 84.6% had their screens reviewed within 21 days of the scan taking place in 2024/25.
Figure 17: test - percentage of abnormal screens (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) reviewed within 21 calendar days of the initial screen date, by provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 17a: test - percentage of abnormal screens (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) reviewed within 21 calendar days of the initial screen date, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 70.8% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 68.8% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 85.0% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 51.9% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 97.6% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 80.6% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 98.2% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 38.1% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 84.4% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 95.2% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 83.3% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 88.7% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 92.5% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 96.5% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 95.6% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 56.9% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 42.1% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 98.6% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.0% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 74.3% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 88.6% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 90.3% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 96.7% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 69.3% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 97.9% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 98.5% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 91.8% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 91.4% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* 34 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 60.0%
* 20 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
* 10 screening providers reviewed all screens within 21 days of the scan taking place service(s):
- Black Country AAA Screening Cohort
- Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort
- Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort
- Gloucester AAA Screening Cohort
- Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort
- Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort
- Leicester AAA Screening Cohort
- Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort
- South Devon AAA Screening Cohort
- West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort
* Essex AAA Screening Cohort (38.1%) had the lowest outcome
* 4 screening providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:
- North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort North East and Yorkshire (56.9%)
- Central England AAA Screening Cohort Midlands (51.9%)
- North London AAA Screening Cohort London (42.1%)
- Essex AAA Screening Cohort East of England (38.1%)
Nationally the proportion men with a small or medium size aneurysm (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) that had their screens reviewed within 21 days of the scan taking place decreased by over 3 percentage points from 2023/24 (87.8%) to 2024/25 (84.6%) but remained above the acceptable threshold.
14. AAA-S13: nurse assessments
Of the 2,889 men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan, 79.9% had a nurse assessment within 12 weeks of their conclusive scan in 2024/25.
Figure 18: test - percentage of men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan who had a nurse assessment ≤ 12 weeks of their conclusive scan, by provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 18a: test - percentage of men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan who had a nurse assessment ≤ 12 weeks of their conclusive scan, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 82.4% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 83.3% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 54.7% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 65.0% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 87.1% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 78.1% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 85.2% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 87.3% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 86.7% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 81.4% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 85.3% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 63.8% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 88.2% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 74.3% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 81.2% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 44.8% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 83.1% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 80.5% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 68.2% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 80.3% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 87.3% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 96.7% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 83.5% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 79.8% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 83.3% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 72.2% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 75.0% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 75.0% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 75.0% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 95.0% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 82.8% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 75.2% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 87.8% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 69.1% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 59.3% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 88.9% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 88.4% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* 37 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 50.0%
* 23 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 80.0%
* Leicester AAA Screening Cohort (100.0%) had the highest performance; all men eligible for a nurse assessment attended an appointment
* Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort (44.8%) had the lowest performance and were the only service to not meet the acceptable threshold
Nationally the proportion of men eligible for a nurse assessment who attended an appointment increased by 10 percentage points from 2023/24 (69.9%) to 2024/25 (79.9%), meeting the acceptable threshold and only slightly below the achievable threshold.
15. AAA-S14: men seen at specialist assessments within 2 weeks
Of the 932 men with an aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, 92.7% were seen by a vascular specialist within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan in 2024/25.
Figure 19: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, seen by vascular specialist within 2 weeks, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 19a: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, seen by vascular specialist within 2 weeks, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 41.7% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 90.2% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 95.7% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 93.9% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 89.5% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 95.8% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 90.9% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 97.4% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 93.8% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 94.4% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 94.3% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 83.3% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 85.4% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 83.3% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 95.2% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 92.6% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 91.7% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 96.0% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 90.9% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 88.9% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 91.7% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 75.0% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 95.0% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 77.8% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 89.5% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 92.3% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* 29 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0%
* 18 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
* 12 screening providers saw all men for a specialist assessment within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan:
- Black Country AAA Screening Cohort
- Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort
- Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort
- Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort
- Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort
- Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort
- Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort
- Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort
- South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort
- Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort
- West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort
- West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort
* Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort (41.7%) had the lowest performance
* 9 screening providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:
- South London AAA Screening Cohort (89.5%)
- Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort (89.5%)
- Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort (88.9%)
- Manchester AAA Screening Cohort (85.4%)
- Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort (83.3%)
- Leicester AAA Screening Cohort (83.3%)
- South Devon AAA Screening Cohort (77.8%)
- Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort (75.0%)
- Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort (41.7%)
Nationally the percentage of men seen for a specialist assessment within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan decreased by 0.9 percentage points from 2023/24 (93.6%) to 2024/25 (92.7%), continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.
16. AAA-S15: men operated on within 8 weeks
Of the 728 men with an aorta of ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining 31.7% were operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks.
Figure 20: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
Figure 20a: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks, in alphabetical order of provider name
Organisation | Performance |
---|---|
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort | 36.4% |
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort | 75.0% |
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort | 0.0% |
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort | 56.2% |
Central England AAA Screening Cohort | 15.2% |
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 16.7% |
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort | 11.1% |
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort | 53.3% |
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort | 46.2% |
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort | 38.5% |
Essex AAA Screening Cohort | 13.6% |
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort | 0.0% |
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort | 20.0% |
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort | 80.0% |
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort | 38.5% |
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 56.2% |
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort | 50.0% |
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 14.8% |
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort | 0.0% |
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort | 50.0% |
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort | 22.2% |
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort | 20.6% |
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort | 40.0% |
North London AAA Screening Cohort | 30.0% |
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort | 18.8% |
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort | 8.0% |
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort | 21.1% |
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort | 60.0% |
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort | 42.1% |
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort | 20.0% |
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 90.9% |
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort | 45.5% |
South London AAA Screening Cohort | 15.2% |
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort | 15.0% |
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort | 21.2% |
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort | 66.7% |
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort | 38.5% |
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort | 100.0% |
The data for the report showed the following provider level information:
* 6 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 60.0%
* 3 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 80.0%
* West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort (100.0%) had the highest performance, all men operated on within 8 weeks
* Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort, Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort and Leicester AAA Screening Cohort (0.0%) had the lowest performance, no men operated on within 8 weeks
Figure 21: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025
The percentage of men operated on within 8 weeks fell to 38.5% in 2019/20. It continues to gradually increase nationally from a low of 24.1% in 2020/21 during the COVID-19 pandemic. For 2024/25 (31.7%), performance has improved 0.1 percentage points from 2023/24 (31.6%), but it is still considerably below the acceptable threshold.
17. Outcomes
The number of fatal and non-fatal AAA ruptures presented are only those reported to the screening provider and will only be for those men who have been screened. This number may, therefore, be an underestimate of the true number of AAA ruptures.
There were 32 AAA ruptures during the screening year. 24 of which were fatal. 15 of the 24 deaths were in men on surveillance and 9 had been referred for surgery.
The 15 fatal AAA ruptures in men on surveillance represented 2.8% of the 252 deaths in men on surveillance.
For the men referred to surgery, 3 had been turned down or had declined the operation and 6 died while waiting for surgery. Of the 6 who died while waiting for surgery, 5 died after waiting more than 8 weeks for surgery.
In 2023/24, 9 men died while waiting for surgery, 6 of whom died after waiting more than 8 weeks from their referral.