Official Statistics

AAA standards report 2024 to 2025

Published 25 September 2025

Applies to England

This data report presents data against each of the 15 screening standards for screening activity related to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening.

The data source used for this report is AAA SMaRT (screening management and referral tracking).

The NHS AAA screening programme  aims to reduce aneurysm-related mortality through early detection, appropriate monitoring and treatment. The NHS AAA screening programme invites men for ultrasound screening during the year (1 April to 31 March) in which they turn 65. Men over 65, who have not previously been screened can self-refer. The programme offers annual or quarterly surveillance for all men who on initial scan are found to have a small or medium aneurysm respectively. Men found to have a large aneurysm are referred into the care of specialised vascular services for potential intervention.

National AAA standards provide a defined set of measures that providers must meet to make sure services are safe and effective. The NHS AAA screening programme published a set of revised standards in April 2020.

This report is an official statistic. Official statistics are an essential public asset. They provide a window on society, the economy, and on the work and performance of government. They are fundamental to the judgements and decisions made by the public, by government, and by a large range of other organisations.

AAA Standards

There are 15 national AAA standards included in this report, which are: 

  * AAA-S01: completeness of offer (initial screen) 

  * AAA-S02: completeness of offer (annual surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S03: completeness of offer (quarterly surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S04: coverage (initial screen) 

  * AAA-S05: coverage (annual surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S06: coverage (quarterly surveillance scan)  

  * AAA-S07: coverage of the initial screen in men living in deciles 1 to 3 

  * AAA-S08: uptake (initial screen) 

  * AAA-S09: uptake (annual surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S10: uptake (quarterly surveillance scan) 

  * AAA-S11: non-visualised screens

  * AAA-S12: internal quality assurance 

  * AAA-S13: nurse assessments 

  * AAA-S14: men seen at specialist assessments within 2 weeks 

  * AAA-S15: men operated on within 8 weeks 

Standards data are published annually. Standard AAA-S04, AAA-S05 and AAA-S06 are also key performance indicators (KPIs), which are published quarterly.

Two thresholds, the acceptable threshold and achievable threshold are specified for each standard.

1. Provider table

Charts in this report display the internal code used by the AAA programme. This table shows the name of the provider associated with each code.

Code Provider                                Region           
BBW  Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort South West           
BCO  Black Country AAA Screening Cohort          Midlands
BLM  Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort        East of England
CAM  Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort         East of England
CHM  Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort  North  West          
CML  Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort North West            
COV  Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort     Midlands
CYH  Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort      North East and Yorkshire            
DBY  Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort             Midlands
DOW  Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort   South West           
ESX  Essex AAA Screening Cohort                  East of England
FRV  Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort            East of England
GLO  Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort   South West           
HAM  Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort              South East            
HFD  Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort          East of England
HOE  Central England AAA Screening Cohort        Midlands
HRW  Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
KEN  Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort          South East            
LEI  Leicester AAA Screening Cohort              Midlands
LNC  Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort           Midlands
MAN  Manchester AAA Screening Cohort             North West           
NOE  North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort North East and Yorkshire            
NOL  North London AAA Screening Cohort           London           
NOR  Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort      East of England
NOT  Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort        Midlands
NRH  Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort       Midlands
NSS  North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort    Midlands
PEN  Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort              South West           
SDE  South Devon AAA Screening Cohort            South West            
SOM  Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort South West            
STW  Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
SWL  South London AAA Screening Cohort           London           
SYB  South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort   North East and Yorkshire         
THV  Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort          South East            
WSR  West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort            South East            
WSU  Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                 South East            
WYO  West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort         North East and Yorkshire          
YOH  North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort North East and Yorkshire            

Data are presented by financial year (1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025) unless stated otherwise.

2. AAA-S01: completeness of offer (initial screen)

There were 337,752 men aged 65 eligible for AAA screening between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025; 99.8% of those eligible men were offered an initial screen within the screening year plus 2 months. The reasons for not being invited include:

  *   offered after 31 May 2025

  *   incorrect contact details

  *   deferring screening

  * opting out of the screening programme

  *   not offered

Figure 1: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 1a: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 99.5%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         99.9%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              100.0%     
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        99.9%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       99.9%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     100.0%     
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               100.0%     
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  100.0%     
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            99.9%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  99.8%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 99.9%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           100.0%     
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                100.0%     
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             99.9%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                99.8%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         99.2%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       99.9%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          100.0%     
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             100.0%     
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          99.9%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            99.6%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   99.8%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          99.9%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          100.0%     
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            99.7%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         99.1%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      99.9%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       99.9%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             100.0%     
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        99.9%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              100.0%     
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           99.9%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          100.0%     
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         99.9%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                99.9%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         98.8%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           99.6%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        99.9%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥  95.0% 

  * 26 out of the 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥  99.9% 

  * Only 1 screening provider Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort (98.8%) did not reach 99% but this still meets the acceptable threshold

Figure 2: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening according to the standard definition, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025

The offer of the initial screen to men in each cohort year was stable between 2013/14 and 2019/20 (see previous years’ reports for data prior to 2017/18). Following the sharp drop in 2020/21 performance due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, performance increased year on year until 2023/24 (99.8%) maintaining this level in 2024/25 (99.8%). The AAA screening programme is meeting the acceptable threshold and just below the achievable threshold, returning to pre-pandemic levels.

3. AAA-S02: completeness of offer (annual surveillance scan)

Between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025 there were 12,190 annual surveillance appointments due and 11,995 had an offer within 6 weeks either side of their due date (98.4%).

Figure 3: percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 6 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 3a: percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 6 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 98.4%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         97.8%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              99.5%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        98.0%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       96.3%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     99.0%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               98.4%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  100.0%     
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            100.0%     
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  100.0%     
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 100.0%     
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           99.7%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                99.7%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             98.1%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                97.3%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         97.3%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       98.5%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          95.3%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             99.5%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          99.3%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            97.5%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   99.7%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          98.7%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          98.1%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            99.0%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         99.3%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      98.2%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       97.7%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             98.6%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        97.4%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              100.0%     
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           99.1%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          96.8%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         99.6%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                98.4%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         95.3%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           97.9%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        97.9%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * 16 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.0% 

  * 5 screening providers, Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort, Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort, Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort, Essex AAA Screening Cohort and Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort offered all surveillance appointments 6 weeks either side of the due date

  * Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort (95.3%) had the lowest performance but still met the acceptable threshold

Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments due where an appointment was offered 6 weeks either side of the due date has remained at 98.4% for 2023/24 and 2024/25, meeting the acceptable threshold.

4. AAA-S03: completeness of offer (quarterly surveillance scan)

Between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025 there were 11,324 quarterly surveillance appointments due and 11,179 had an offer within 4 weeks either side of their due date (98.7%).

Figure 4: percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 4 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 4a: percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 4 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 99.4%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         99.4%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              99.0%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        100.0%     
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       98.4%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     99.7%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               97.5%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  99.6%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            98.5%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  98.8%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 100.0%     
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           97.4%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                99.1%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             98.8%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                97.2%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         99.1%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       98.1%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          97.3%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             96.9%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          98.8%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            98.5%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   99.7%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          99.4%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          98.7%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            99.8%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         100.0%     
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      98.9%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       99.1%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             98.9%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        99.3%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              99.3%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           97.2%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          97.4%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         99.6%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                99.4%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         95.8%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           99.5%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        94.9%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 37 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * 18 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.0% 

  * 3 screening providers, Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort, Essex AAA Screening Cohort and North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort, offered all appointments 4 weeks either side of the due date

  * West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort (94.9%) had the lowest performance and were the only service to not meet the acceptable threshold

Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments due where an appointment was offered 4 weeks either side of the due date increased from 2023/24 (98.6%) to 2024/25 (98.7%), meeting the acceptable threshold.

5. AAA-S04: coverage (initial screen)

Of the 338,344 men aged 65 eligible for AAA screening between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025; 82.2% of those eligible men were conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months.

Figure 5: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 5a: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 80.2%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         82.8%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              83.1%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        86.8%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       76.9%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     82.1%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               80.4%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  83.1%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            87.6%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  87.8%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 82.8%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           86.3%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                84.8%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             85.4%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                86.1%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         82.3%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       85.0%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          79.4%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             85.0%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          86.8%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            79.6%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   81.9%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          82.5%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          75.1%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            81.6%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         80.8%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      85.0%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       87.1%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             88.7%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        87.6%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              87.5%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           89.7%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          77.6%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         83.9%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                83.2%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         81.5%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           80.0%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        81.1%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0% 

  * 13 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0% 

  * South Devon AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (89.7%)

  * North London AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (75.1%), but still met the acceptable threshold  

Figure 6: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested according to the standard definition, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025

Following the decrease in performance in 2020/21, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, performance has continued to increase year on year to 2024/25, meeting the acceptable threshold and exceeding the levels seen pre-pandemic.

6. AAA-S05: coverage (annual surveillance scan)

Of the 12,190 annual surveillance appointments due between 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025, 92.3% had a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date.

Figure 7: coverage - percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 7a: coverage - percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 94.1%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         94.8%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              93.5%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        94.9%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       88.5%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     95.1%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               92.6%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  96.8%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            93.7%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  96.5%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 93.0%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           96.2%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                93.4%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             90.9%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                95.1%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         93.4%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       91.5%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          88.1%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             91.7%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          96.2%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            89.7%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   96.0%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          94.3%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          86.7%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            93.3%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         92.4%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      88.8%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       94.8%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             93.9%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        87.9%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              92.9%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           90.8%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          87.6%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         93.1%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                92.4%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         86.1%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           89.9%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        92.3%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 85.0% 

  * 7 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort (96.8%) had the highest performance

  * Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort (86.1%) had the lowest performance, but still met the acceptable threshold

Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments due that had a conclusive test 6 weeks either side of the due date increased by 0.7 percentage points from 2023/24 (91.6%) to 2024/25 (92.3%), meeting the acceptable threshold. 

7. AAA-S06: coverage (quarterly surveillance scan)

Of the 11,324 quarterly surveillance appointments due between 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025, 93.3% had a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date.

Figure 8: coverage- percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 8a: coverage - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 94.2%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         96.9%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              95.9%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        96.3%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       88.5%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     95.5%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               91.6%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  92.6%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            93.6%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  96.2%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 95.6%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           95.4%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                94.9%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             93.5%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                90.0%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         96.2%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       92.9%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          90.0%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             91.2%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          96.0%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            89.4%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   94.8%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          96.7%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          90.7%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            93.6%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         92.2%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      90.1%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       96.3%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             95.8%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        94.5%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              91.3%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           91.9%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          84.4%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         96.1%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                95.8%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         88.8%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           93.5%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        91.0%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 34 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0% 

  * 14 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * Black Country AAA Screening Cohort (96.9%) had the highest performance

  * South London AAA Screening Cohort (84.4%) had the lowest performance

  * 4 screening providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:   

      - Manchester AAA Screening Cohort (89.4%)

      - Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort    (88.8%)

      - Central England AAA Screening Cohort (88.5%)

      - South London AAA Screening Cohort     (84.4%)

Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments due that had a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date increased from 2023/24 (92.8%) to 2024/25 (93.3%), meeting the acceptable threshold.

8. AAA-S07: coverage of the initial screen in men living in deciles 1 to 3

Nationally for 2024/25 the percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019 was 75.0%. This contrasts with  82.2% for the overall cohort.

Figure 9: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 9a: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 68.0%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         78.1%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              71.5%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        79.9%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       69.9%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     76.0%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               74.1%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  74.8%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            80.8%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  80.0%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 74.7%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           79.6%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                74.2%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             78.1%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                78.4%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         73.8%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       77.8%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          71.0%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             76.8%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          82.3%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            73.9%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   74.0%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          76.5%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          73.0%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            72.5%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         73.3%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      75.9%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       80.2%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             85.3%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        78.4%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              80.5%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           85.5%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          71.0%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         79.2%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                75.3%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         67.2%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           75.4%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        74.4%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 21 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0% 

  * 2 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0% 

  * South Devon AAA Screening Cohort (85.5%) had the highest performance and Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort (85.3%) also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0%

  * Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort (67.2%) had the lowest performance

Figure 10: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, England, 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2025

Men living in more deprived areas are less likely to attend for screening but are more likely to have an aneurysm. It is important for providers to engage with men living in more deprived areas to make sure they can make a personal informed choice.

This standard is now in the fifth year of being reported and it should be reviewed alongside standard 4. It was first introduced in April 2020, however performance during 2020/2021 was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Performance has increased year on year and this is the first year that the acceptable threshold has been met.

9. AAA-S08: uptake (initial screen)

There were 337,752 men offered AAA screening between 1 April 2024 and 31 March 2025; 82.3% of those men offered an initial screen were conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months.

Figure 11: uptake - percentage of eligible men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 11a: uptake - percentage of eligible men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 80.6%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         82.9%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              83.2%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        86.9%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       77.0%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     82.1%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               80.5%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  83.2%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            87.7%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  87.9%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 82.9%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           86.4%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                84.8%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             85.5%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                86.2%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         83.0%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       85.1%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          79.4%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             85.0%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          86.9%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            79.9%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   82.1%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          82.5%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          75.1%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            81.9%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         81.6%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      85.0%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       87.2%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             88.7%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        87.7%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              87.5%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           89.7%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          77.6%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         83.9%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                83.3%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         82.4%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           80.3%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        81.2%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0% 

  * 15 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0% 

  * South Devon AAA Screening Cohort (89.7%) had the highest performance

  * North London AAA Screening Cohort (75.1%) had the lowest performance, but still met the acceptable threshold

Figure 12: uptake - percentage of men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the initial screening year plus 2 months, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025

The percentage of men offered screening who were conclusively tested has remained above the acceptable threshold including throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. It has been above 80% for 3 years; 2022/23 (80.8%) to 2023/24 (82.1%) to 2024/25 (82.3%).

10. AAA-S09: uptake (annual surveillance scan)

Of the 11,995 annual surveillance appointments that were offered within 6 weeks either side of the due date, 93.8% had a conclusive test within the 6 weeks between 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.

Figure 13: uptake - percentage of annual surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 13a: uptake - percentage of annual surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 95.6%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         96.9%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              94.0%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        96.8%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       91.9%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     96.1%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               94.1%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  96.8%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            93.7%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  96.5%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 93.0%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           96.6%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                93.8%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             92.7%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                97.7%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         96.0%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       92.9%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          92.5%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             92.2%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          96.9%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            92.0%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   96.3%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          95.6%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          88.4%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            94.3%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         93.0%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      90.4%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       97.0%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             95.3%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        90.3%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              92.9%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           91.7%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          90.5%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         93.5%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                93.9%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         90.4%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           91.8%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        94.2%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 37 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0% 

  * 14 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort (97.7%) had the highest performance

  * North London AAA Screening Cohort (88.4%) had the lowest performance and were the only service to not meet the acceptable threshold

Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments offered where there was a conclusive test within 6 weeks either side of the due date has been above the acceptable threshold since 2021/22. It has been just above 93% since 2021/22 rising to 93.8% in 2024/25.

11. AAA-S10: uptake (quarterly surveillance scan)

Of the 11,179 quarterly surveillance appointments offered within 4 weeks either side of the due date, 94.5% had a conclusive test within the 4 weeks between 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.

Figure 14: uptake - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 14a: uptake - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 94.8%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         97.5%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              96.9%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        96.3%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       89.9%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     95.8%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               93.9%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  92.9%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            95.0%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  97.3%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 95.6%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           97.9%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                95.7%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             94.6%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                92.6%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         97.1%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       94.6%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          92.5%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             94.2%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          97.1%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            90.7%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   95.1%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          97.3%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          91.9%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            93.8%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         92.2%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      91.1%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       97.2%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             96.9%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        95.2%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              91.9%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           94.5%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          86.7%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         96.4%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                96.3%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         92.7%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           94.0%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        95.9%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 36 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0% 

  * 18 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort (97.9%) had the highest performance

  * South London AAA Screening Cohort (86.7%) had the lowest performance

  * 2 screening providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:   

      - Central England AAA Screening Cohort  (89.9%)

      - South London AAA Screening Cohort (86.7%)

Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there was a conclusive test within 4 weeks either side of the due date increased by 0.3 percentage points from 2023/24 (94.2%) to 2024/25 (94.5%), continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.

12. AAA-S11: non-visualised screens

Screening providers should aim to minimise the percentage of screens that cannot be visualised. Therefore, the lower the value the better for this standard. Nationally 1.0% of cohort screens were non-visualised in 2024/25.

Figure 15: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 15a: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 1.2%       
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         0.5%       
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              1.4%       
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        1.4%       
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       0.2%       
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     0.3%       
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               1.8%       
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  1.8%       
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            0.4%       
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  1.2%       
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 2.4%       
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           0.4%       
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                0.4%       
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             0.7%       
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                1.8%       
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         0.7%       
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       0.5%       
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          0.9%       
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             0.3%       
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          1.1%       
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            2.7%       
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   0.3%       
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          0.0%       
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          0.7%       
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            0.5%       
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         0.3%       
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      1.2%       
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       1.0%       
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             0.8%       
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        1.7%       
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              0.7%       
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           1.1%       
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          2.0%       
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         0.6%       
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                1.2%       
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         1.0%       
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           1.3%       
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        2.9%       

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≤ 3.0% 

  * 19 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≤ 1.0% 

  * North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort (0.0%) had the lowest performance (lower the value the better)

  * West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort (2.9%) had the highest performance (lower the value the better) but still met the acceptable threshold

Figure 16: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025

The percentage of non-visualised screens is stable across England over the series. For 2024/25, national performance was reported as 1.0% when rounded to one decimal place, but the actual value was slightly above 1.0%, meeting the acceptable but not the achievable threshold. Two providers in the above table reported 1.0% but the actual value was slightly above 1.0%, meeting the acceptable but not the achievable threshold.

13. AAA-S12: internal quality assurance

Of the 1,895 men with a small or medium size aneurysm (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm), 84.6% had their screens reviewed within 21 days of the scan taking place in 2024/25.

Figure 17: test - percentage of abnormal screens (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) reviewed within 21 calendar days of the initial screen date, by provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 17a: test - percentage of abnormal screens (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) reviewed within 21 calendar days of the initial screen date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 70.8%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         100.0%     
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              68.8%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        85.0%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       51.9%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     100.0%     
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               97.6%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  80.6%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            100.0%     
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  98.2%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 38.1%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           84.4%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                100.0%     
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             100.0%     
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                95.2%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         100.0%     
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       83.3%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          88.7%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             100.0%     
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          92.5%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            96.5%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   95.6%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          56.9%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          42.1%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            98.6%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         97.0%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      74.3%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       88.6%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             90.3%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        100.0%     
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              96.7%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           100.0%     
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          69.3%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         97.9%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                98.5%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         91.8%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           100.0%     
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        91.4%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 34 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 60.0% 

  * 20 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * 10 screening providers reviewed all screens within 21 days of the scan taking place service(s): 

      - Black Country AAA Screening Cohort

      - Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort

      - Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort

      - Gloucester AAA Screening Cohort

      - Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort

      - Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort

      - Leicester AAA Screening Cohort

      - Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort

      - South Devon AAA Screening Cohort

      - West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 

  * Essex AAA Screening Cohort (38.1%) had the lowest outcome 

  * 4 screening providers did not meet the acceptable threshold: 

      - North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort North East and Yorkshire (56.9%)

      - Central England AAA Screening Cohort  Midlands (51.9%)

      - North London AAA Screening Cohort     London (42.1%)

      - Essex AAA Screening Cohort East of England (38.1%)

Nationally the proportion men with a small or medium size aneurysm (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) that had their screens reviewed within 21 days of the scan taking place decreased by over 3 percentage points from 2023/24 (87.8%) to 2024/25 (84.6%) but remained above the acceptable threshold. 

14. AAA-S13: nurse assessments

Of the 2,889 men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan, 79.9% had a nurse assessment within 12 weeks of their conclusive scan in 2024/25.

Figure 18: test - percentage of men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan who had a nurse assessment ≤ 12 weeks of their conclusive scan, by provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 18a: test - percentage of men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan who had a nurse assessment ≤ 12 weeks of their conclusive scan, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 82.4%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         83.3%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              54.7%      
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        65.0%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       87.1%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     78.1%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               85.2%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  87.3%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            86.7%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  81.4%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 85.3%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           63.8%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                88.2%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             74.3%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                81.2%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         44.8%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       83.1%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          80.5%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             100.0%     
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          68.2%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            80.3%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   87.3%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          96.7%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          83.5%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            79.8%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         83.3%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      72.2%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       75.0%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             75.0%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        75.0%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              95.0%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           82.8%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          75.2%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         87.8%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                69.1%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         59.3%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           88.9%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        88.4%      

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 37 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 50.0% 

  * 23 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 80.0% 

  * Leicester AAA Screening Cohort (100.0%) had the highest performance; all men eligible for a nurse assessment attended an appointment

  * Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort (44.8%) had the lowest performance and were the only service to not meet the acceptable threshold

Nationally the proportion of men eligible for a nurse assessment who attended an appointment increased by 10 percentage points from 2023/24 (69.9%) to 2024/25 (79.9%), meeting the acceptable threshold and only slightly below the achievable threshold.

15. AAA-S14: men seen at specialist assessments within 2 weeks

Of the 932 men with an aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, 92.7% were seen by a vascular specialist within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan in 2024/25.

Figure 19: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, seen by vascular specialist within 2 weeks, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 19a: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, seen by vascular specialist within 2 weeks, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 41.7%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         100.0%     
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              100.0%     
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        100.0%     
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       90.2%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     95.7%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               100.0%     
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  100.0%     
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            93.9%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  89.5%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 95.8%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           90.9%      
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                100.0%     
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             97.4%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                93.8%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         94.4%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       100.0%     
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          94.3%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             83.3%      
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          100.0%     
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            85.4%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   83.3%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          95.2%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          92.6%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            91.7%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         96.0%      
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      90.9%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       88.9%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             91.7%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        75.0%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              95.0%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           77.8%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          89.5%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         100.0%     
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                92.3%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         100.0%     
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           100.0%     
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        100.0%     

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 29 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0% 

  * 18 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0% 

  * 12 screening providers saw all men for a specialist assessment within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan: 

      -   Black Country AAA Screening Cohort

      -   Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort

      -   Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort

      -   Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort

      -   Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort

      -   Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort

      -   Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort

      -   Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort

      -   South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort

      -   Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort

      -   West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort

      -   West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort  

  * Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort (41.7%) had the lowest performance

  * 9 screening providers did not meet the acceptable threshold: 

      -   South London AAA Screening Cohort   (89.5%)

      -   Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort (89.5%)

      -   Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort      (88.9%)

      -   Manchester AAA Screening Cohort     (85.4%)

      -   Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort  (83.3%)

      -   Leicester AAA Screening Cohort      (83.3%)

      -   South Devon AAA Screening Cohort    (77.8%)

      -   Shropshire Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort   (75.0%)

      -   Bedfordshire Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort  (41.7%)

Nationally the percentage of men seen for a specialist assessment within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan decreased by 0.9 percentage points from 2023/24 (93.6%) to 2024/25 (92.7%), continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.

16. AAA-S15: men operated on within 8 weeks

Of the 728 men with an aorta of ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining 31.7% were operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks.

Figure 20: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025

Figure 20a: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation                                               Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 36.4%      
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort                         75.0%      
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort              0.0%       
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort                        56.2%      
Central England AAA Screening Cohort                       15.2%      
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                     16.7%      
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort               11.1%      
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort                  53.3%      
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort                            46.2%      
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort                  38.5%      
Essex AAA Screening Cohort                                 13.6%      
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort                           0.0%       
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort                20.0%      
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort                             80.0%      
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort                38.5%      
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort                         56.2%      
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort                       50.0%      
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          14.8%      
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort                             0.0%       
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort                          50.0%      
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort                            22.2%      
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort                   20.6%      
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort          40.0%      
North London AAA Screening Cohort                          30.0%      
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort            18.8%      
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort         8.0%       
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort                      21.1%      
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort                       60.0%      
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort                             42.1%      
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort        20.0%      
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort              90.9%      
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort                           45.5%      
South London AAA Screening Cohort                          15.2%      
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort         15.0%      
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort                                21.2%      
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort                         66.7%      
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort                           38.5%      
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort                        100.0%     

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  * 6 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 60.0% 

  * 3 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 80.0% 

  * West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort (100.0%) had the highest performance, all men operated on within 8 weeks

  * Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort, Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort and Leicester AAA Screening Cohort (0.0%) had the lowest performance, no men operated on within 8 weeks

Figure 21: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2025

The percentage of men operated on within 8 weeks fell to 38.5% in 2019/20. It continues to gradually increase nationally from a low of 24.1% in 2020/21 during the COVID-19 pandemic. For 2024/25 (31.7%), performance has improved 0.1 percentage points from 2023/24 (31.6%), but it is still considerably below the acceptable threshold.

17. Outcomes

The number of fatal and non-fatal AAA ruptures presented are only those reported to the screening provider and will only be for those men who have been screened. This number may, therefore, be an underestimate of the true number of AAA ruptures. 

There were 32 AAA ruptures during the screening year. 24 of which were fatal. 15 of the 24 deaths were in men on surveillance and 9 had been referred for surgery.

The 15 fatal AAA ruptures in men on surveillance represented 2.8% of the 252 deaths in men on surveillance.

For the men referred to surgery, 3 had been turned down or had declined the operation and 6 died while waiting for surgery. Of the 6 who died while waiting for surgery, 5 died after waiting more than 8 weeks for surgery.

In 2023/24, 9 men died while waiting for surgery, 6 of whom died after waiting more than 8 weeks from their referral.