This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government
Statement by Ambassador Lyall Grant of the UK Mission to the UN, to the UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine.
Thank you Madam President. I am grateful to Under-Secretary-General Feltman for his briefing.
The United Kingdom requested this meeting because we are deeply concerned by the deteriorating security situation in south and east Ukraine and by the fact that the Geneva agreement of 17 April is not yet achieving its objective to restore stability in Ukraine. It is vitally important that the Security Council maintains its close scrutiny of events in Ukraine and the consequent threat to international peace and security.
We will doubtless hear Russian claims that it is the actions of the Ukrainian government that are destabilising the south and east of the country. In fact, it is Russia that has taken further dangerous steps aimed at fomenting instability in Ukraine: they have directed paramilitary actions in Slovyansk, Kramatorsk, Lugansk and other towns in eastern Ukraine; Russian military jets and helicopters have made incursions into Ukrainian airspace;
Russian armed forces have held further military exercises on Ukraine’s border.
These are all clear attempts to escalate tensions within Ukraine.
These steps have been matched with intensified rhetoric. The Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation has asserted that Russia has a legal basis to intervene in Ukraine in accordance with the right of self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter.
This is a claim that takes Russia’s distortion of international law to a new level. There is no justification or legal basis whatsoever for invoking Article 51. Russian nationals are not under threat in Ukraine - a fact that has been reaffirmed on numerous occasions, including by the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission and by the OSCE Commissioner for National Minorities.
This is deeply irresponsible rhetoric intended to threaten and intimidate the Ukrainian government and provide a bogus pretext for further illegal breaches of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity.
As a result of Russia’s activities, there has been a further marked deterioration in the security situation in east and south Ukraine as Mr Feltman has just said.
The United Kingdom condemns the abduction at gunpoint and public parading of an OSCE Vienna Document inspection team and their Ukrainian escorts. We call upon those responsible to ensure the safe treatment and immediate release of the team and we urge Russia, itself an OSCE member, to use its influence to ensure that this happens without further delay.
On 17 April, talks between Ukraine, Russia, the United States and the European Union succeeded in agreeing steps to reduce tensions. The United Kingdom welcomed that agreement and the opportunity it offered for restoring stability in Ukraine.
But this opportunity has been spurned.
Since the 17 April, the actions undertaken by Kyiv and Moscow stand in stark contrast.
Let us consider the facts.
First: the Geneva Agreement called for all sides to refrain from violence, intimidation or provocative actions.
For its part, the Ukrainian government has acted with commendable restraint when undertaking measured and proportionate security operations to deal with armed groups illegally occupying government buildings and forming checkpoints. The Ukrainian government has the right and responsibility to uphold the rule of law and protect both its citizens and its officials on Ukrainian territory.
Russia, on the other hand, continues its military manoeuvres and aggressive rhetoric.
Second: the Agreement called for all illegal armed groups to be disarmed.
The Ukrainian government started to collect illegal weapons almost as soon as it came to power. There are now no illegally armed protesters on Maidan Square and no armed self defence groups patrolling the streets of Kyiv.
But in Slovyansk and other eastern cities, encouraged by Russia, we continue to see heavily-armed paramilitary forces armed with automatic rifles and RPGs.
Third: the Agreement called for all illegally seized buildings, occupied streets and public places to be vacated. The Ukrainian government has been systematically and incrementally removing barricades around the Maidan and the protests there are gradually shrinking.
By contrast, Russia has refused to use its influence to restrain armed groups in the east. In fact, Foreign Minister Lavrov stated on 23 April that Russia will not call for these illegal militias to put down their arms and vacate buildings. Instead, barricades and roadblocks in east and south Ukraine have been steadily reinforced.
Furthermore, while Ukraine has put a draft law to the Ukrainian Parliament that would provide amnesty for protestors who vacate government buildings and lay down their weapons, Russia has not rescinded the order by the Russian parliament to authorise the use of military force in Ukraine and will not condemn the widely-reported abuses by pro-Russian armed groups in south and east Ukraine.
These abuses include at least 11 kidnappings, among them several Ukrainian and international journalists, and the torture and murder of a Ukrainian local official and two other local people. The deplorable shooting yesterday of the Mayor of Kharkiv was another sign of the violence being instigated against those who have opted to support a united Ukraine.
Finally, Ukraine has begun an inclusive process of constitutional reform on decentralisation of power. It has announced measures to guarantee the protection of the Russian language. And it has condemned instances of anti-Semitism and xenophobia.
Whereas Russian rhetoric continues to whip up tensions with false claims that the Russian language is under threat in Ukraine and allegations that the Kyiv government is anti-Semitic.
When you lay out the facts, they cut through the fiction of Russian propaganda.
Having illegally annexed Crimea, Russia is now destabilising south and east Ukraine as part of its plan to undermine the ability of the people of Ukraine to determine peacefully their own future. In doing so, they are threatening international peace and security. But the doors of diplomacy remain open. We urge Russia to abandon the dangerous course it is pursuing and take urgent steps to implement the Geneva agreement.
In the extremely difficult circumstances which now confront it, the Ukrainian Government is striving to take forward a programme of democratisation and inclusive constitutional and economic reform that aims to correct the long period of misgovernment and corruption that preceded it. It is in all our interests to support this process. This is not about zero-sum game politics. It is about restoring stability to Ukraine and to the wider region and allowing all the people of Ukraine to determine their own future. We urge Russia to become part of this collective international effort.
I thank you.