Reviews of marking and moderation: guide to the submissions process
Updated 17 October 2023
Applies to England
Introduction
In order to fulfil our regulatory and accreditation functions as set out in the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009, we require awarding organisations to provide exams delivery data for regulated qualifications.
We collect the data on behalf of CCEA Regulation and share this data with them.
What data will be collected?
Reviews of marking and moderation data, which was formerly referred to as Enquiries about Results (EaRs), will be collected for GCSE, GCSE linear, GCSE full course, GCSE short course, AS, A-level and Advanced Extension Award (AEA) and Project levels 1, 2 and 3.
When will data be collected?
Data will be collected according to the reporting schedule which is agreed and maintained by Ofqual’s data services team.
Updates to formats and guidance
This guidance document will be updated regularly. Any changes to procedure will be incorporated into the guidance document.
How to submit your data
Your data should be submitted to us in CSV format. Please refer to the [‘Connecting to Ofqual’s data portal and uploading data’ document] on our web page.(https://www.gov.uk/guidance/submitting-data-to-ofqual) to help you submit your files to us. If you need to ask us about a data submission please contact the Data Services team. Please do not send your data files via email to Data Services or to any other Ofqual email address, or via Contact the Regulator in the Portal.
Uploaded data
Once files have been successfully uploaded, the data will be validated against a set of validation rules. These are detailed in the sections below. If validation is successful, the data is automatically transferred into our systems and you will receive email confirmation. If the file is unsuccessful at any stage of validation you will receive an email with details of the validation failure. Please correct your file and resubmit it.
Amendments to data
Ofqual staff will not alter data once it has been submitted. If you find an error or omission after you’ve had a successful upload, please notify us by email. We need to reject the existing submission before you can upload a new file.
How your data will be used
This data will be used to undertake our regulatory activities and, where required, to produce Official Statistics to fulfil our responsibility as a government department.
General completion guidelines
- Numeric values must not have any formatting.
- Where applicable data should be submitted at subcomponent level.
- Unit UMS fields (see positions 12 and 13) should be overall unit UMS values, even if row of data being reported relates to subcomponents.
- For rows of data that relate to subcomponents, the value entered in the Unit Max. Raw Mark field (see position 20), should be the sub component maximum raw mark.
- For service 3, the value entered in the Date Received field, should be the date the moderator received the sample.
- For common units (that can be used to certificate against both AS and/or A level), if a review of marking request is made, and the candidate is certificating for both AS and A2, only the A2 row should be present in the data.
- The following fields will accept -2 to represent unknown for candidates that are not certificating:
Field name | Notes |
---|---|
QAN | -2 for unknown e.g. cases where candidate is not certificating |
Specification code | For none certificating candidates taking units/components that can be used against multiple specifications |
Original unit raw mark | -2 accepted for absences |
Post EaR raw mark | -2 accepted for EaRs still in process, so post EaR mark not yet established |
Original unit UMS | -2 accepted for subjects that do not convert to UMS |
Post EaR UMS | -2 accepted for subjects that do not convert to UMS |
Original qualification UMS (modular) / Scale score (linear) | -2 accepted for candidates not certificating |
Post EaR qualification UMS (modular) / Scale score (linear) | -2 accepted for candidates not certificating |
Original qualification grade | -2 accepted for candidates not certificating |
Post EaR qualification grade | -2 accepted for candidates not certificating |
Total No. of awards/certifications | -2 accepted for candidates not certificating |
Reason | -2 accepted where there wasn’t a qualification grade change of two or more |
File format
The file must be CSV format and the first row must be headers as displayed in the ‘Name’ column of the table below. The subsequent rows must have the values of the data to be reported which must match the format and validation rules below.
Name | Description | Position | Validation Regular Expression | Description of Regular Expression |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exam series | Exam series data relates to, for example, June 2016 | 1 | ^(January|March|June|November)([ ][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])$ |
Full month name of exam series and year. |
Reporting date | Date the file was due to be submitted regardless of when it was actually uploaded. Format accepted 120 ODBC canonical yyyy-mm-dd. | 2 | ^(20)\d\d[-](0[1-9]|1[012])[-](0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$ |
The date in the following format: year (4 digits), a dash, month (2 digits), a dash, day (2 digits). |
Awarding Organisation | Name of the awarding organisation | 3 | ^.{1,100}$ |
1 to 100 characters accepted |
Centre No. | Centre number (NCN) | 4 | ^\d{1,5}$ |
Up to 5 digit integer accepted |
Unique Candidate Identifier | Unique Candidate Identifier (UCI) | 5 | ^.{1,13}$ |
Alpha numeric 13 characters accepted |
QAN | Qualification Accreditation Number, for example, 123/1234/1 | 6 | ^.{1,10}$ |
1 to 10 characters accepted -2 also accepted |
Specification title | Specification title also known as subject title | 7 | ^.{1,150}$ |
1 to 150 characters accepted Not Certificating also accepted. |
Specification code | Specification code also known as Subject Award Code and Cash-in Code | 8 | ^.{1,7}$ |
1 to 7 characters accepted -2 also accepted |
Qualification level | Level of qualification for example, GCSE | 9 | ^(GCSE|GCSE linear|GCSE short course|GCSE full course|AS|A level|A-level|App A Level Dbl|App A Level Sgl|App AS Dbl|App AS Sgl| AEA|Project L1|Project L2|Project L3)$ |
One of the following list: GCSE, GCSE linear, GCSE short course, GCSE full course, AS, A level, App A Level Dbl, App A Level Sgl, App AS Dbl, App AS Sgl, AEA, Project L1, Project L2, or Project L3, |
Original unit raw mark | Original unit raw mark | 10 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Up to 3-digit integer accepted -2 also accepted |
Post EaR raw mark | Post EaR raw mark | 11 | ^(TBD|\d{1,3})$ |
Up to 3-digit integer or TBD accepted -2 also accepted |
Original unit UMS | Original unit UMS Unit UMS fields should be overall unit UMS values, even if row of data being reported relates to subcomponents. | 12 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Up to 3-digit integer accepted -2 also accepted |
Post EaR UMS | Post EaR UMS Unit UMS fields should be overall unit UMS values, even if row of data being reported relates to subcomponents. | 13 | ^(TBD|\d{1,3})$ |
Up to 3-digit integer or TBD accepted -2 also accepted |
Original qualification UMS (modular) / Scale score (linear) | Original qualification UMS (modular) or Scale score (linear) | 14 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Up to 3-digit integer accepted -2 also accepted |
Post EaR qualification UMS (modular) / Scale score (linear) | Post EaR qualification UMS (modular) or Scale score (linear) | 15 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Up to 3-digit integer accepted -2 also accepted |
Original qualification grade | Original qualification grade | 16 | ^(A*|A*A*|A*A|A Star| A Star A Star| A Star A|AA|AB|BB|BC*|BC|C*C*|C*C|CC|CD|DD|DE|EE|EF|FF|FG|GG|UU|A|B|C*|C|D|E|F|G|Q|U|X|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|1-1|2-1|2-2|3-2|3-3|4-3|4-4|5-4|5-5|6-5|6-6|7-6|7-7|8-7|8-8|9-8|9-9|-2)$ |
One of the following list: A, A Star, AA, A Star A Star, AA, A Star A, AA, AA, AB, BB, BC, BC, CC, CC, CC, CD, DD, DE, EE, EF, FF, FG, GG, A, B, C, C, D, E, F, G, Q, U, X, 1-9, 1-1 to 9-9 and any of the grades listed, followed by a number from 1-5 for example, C3. -2 also accepted |
Post EaR qualification grade | Post EaR qualification grade | 17 | ^(A*|A*A*|A*A|A Star| A Star A Star| A Star A|AA|AB|BB|BC*|BC|C*C*|C*C|CC|CD|DD|DE|EE|EF|FF|FG|GG|UU|A|B|C*|C|D|E|F|G|Q|U|X|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|1-1|2-1|2-2|3-2|3-3|4-3|4-4|5-4|5-5|6-5|6-6|7-6|7-7|8-7|8-8|9-8|9-9|-2)$ |
One of the following list: A, A Star, AA, A Star A Star, AA, A Star A, AA, AA, AB, BB, BC, BC, CC, CC, CC, CD, DD, DE, EE, EF, FF, FG, GG, A, B, C, C, D, E, F, G, Q, U, X, 1-9, 1-1 to 9-9 and any of the grades listed, followed by a number from 1-5 for example, C3. -2 also accepted |
Unit code | Unit code | 18 | ^.{1,10}$ |
1 to 10 characters accepted |
Unit title | Unit title | 19 | ^.{1,150}$ |
1 to 150 characters accepted |
Unit max. raw mark | Unit maximum raw mark For rows of data that relate to subcomponents, the value entered, should be the subcomponent maximum raw mark. | 20 | ^\d{1,3}$ |
Up to 3 digit integer accepted |
Total No. of unit entries | Total Number of unit entries | 21 | ^\d{1,6}$ |
Up to 6 digit integer accepted |
Total No. of awards/certifications | Total Number of awards or certifications | 22 | ^\d{1,6}$ |
Up to 6 digit integer accepted -2 also accepted |
Service | Type of service for example, 2 | 23 | ^(1|2|P2|3)$ |
One of the following list: 1, 2, P2, 3 |
Marking method | Marking method | 24 | ^(Full Script Paper Based|Full Script Electronic|Item Based Electronic|Internal Assessment)$ |
One of the following list: Full Script Paper Based, Full Script Electronic, Item Based Electronic, or Internal Assessment |
Date received | Date received For service 3, the value entered, should be the date the moderator received the sample. | 25 | ^(20)\d\d[-](0[1-9]|1[012])[-](0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$ |
DATETIME in the following format: year (4 digits), a dash, month (2 digits), a dash, day (2 digits), a space, hour (2 digits), a colon, minutes (2 digits), a colon, seconds (2 digits). |
Date completed | Date completed | 26 | ^(20)\d\d[-](0[1-9]|1[012])[-](0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$ |
DATETIME in the following format: year (4 digits), a dash, month (2 digits), a dash, day (2 digits), a space, hour (2 digits), a colon, minutes (2 digits), a colon, seconds (2 digits). 2999-12-31 00:00:00.000 or ‘still in process’ accepted |
Completed within deadline | Completed within deadline | 27 | ^(Y|N|TBD)$ |
One of the following list: Y, N, TBD |
Reason | Grade change reasons for qualification grade changes of 2 or more | 28 | ^(1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17)$ |
One of the following list: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. See Annex A below -2 accepted where there wasn’t a qualification grade change of 2 or more |
Annex A
Grade change reasons for qualification grade changes of 2 or more | Code to be entered for this field |
---|---|
Work not seen or marked by original examiner | 1 |
Error in totalling of marks by original examiner (for example, examiner did not add up marks correctly) | 2 |
Error in transferring marks from paper script to exam processing system (for example, discrepancy between marks on script and marks on exam board system) | 3 |
Error in inputting marks on online marking system by original examiner (for example, mark incorrectly input) | 4 |
Error in centre submitting marks (for example, incorrect mark submitted for non-examination assessment) | 5 |
Original marking or processing had incorrectly dealt with a candidate rubric error and/or answer in wrong answer space. | 6 |
Original marker unable to read candidate response (for example, illegible handwriting) | 7 |
Application of special consideration during post-results (where the component or qualification was also subject to a review of marking) | 8 |
Missing script located at review (for example, original script not marked). | 9 |
Processing error (for example, scanning, scaling, grading) | 10 |
Auto-marking error (for example, wrong answer key) | 11 |
Outcome of malpractice investigation (for example, mark change due to estimation of marks) | 12 |
Marking – misapplication of levels based mark scheme | 13 |
Marking – misapplication of points-based mark scheme | 14 |
Marking – unusual candidate response (for example, candidate response not covered by the mark scheme) | 15 |
Moderation – misapplication of criteria by original moderator (for example, error by original moderator) | 16 |
No mark change – grade change due to changes on other component(s). | 17 |
Contacts
For all queries relating to the data collection process, amendments to data previously provided, or for general guidance. please contact:
Data services
Ofqual
2nd floor, 1 Friargate
Station Square
Coventry
CV1 2GN