Guidance
  
  
    Compliance audit 2020 to 2021: breach severity list, accessible version
Updated 27 January 2021
Applies to England
1. General breaches
| Item number | Breach | Severity level | 
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comprehensive scheme file containing all relevant documents (as set out in the CFG) not provided | medium | 
| 2 | Key document not on file: requested by lead auditor but not provided | high | 
| 3 | Key document not on file: provided following request by Lead auditor, but not within 2 weeks of request | medium | 
| 4 | Key document not on file: provided within 2 weeks of request | low | 
| 5 | Incorrect processing route in IMS | high | 
| 6 | The development costs are lower than the contractual commitment, and no variation has been agreed | medium | 
| 7 | Quality standards documentation on file does not meet the requirements set out in the contract and/or bid | medium | 
| 8 | Incorrect IMS data has been entered but there are no value for money implications. Examples might include typographical errors, or a failure to update the system with revised information | low | 
| 9 | Incorrect IMS data has been entered with value for money implications | medium | 
| 10 | Grant payments(s) claimed in respect of units funded through a planning obligation (including section 106 agreements) | high | 
2. Pre-development breaches
| Item number | Breach | Severity level | 
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Valid valuation (as set out in the CFG) not obtained in respect of a scheme for which it was required | high | 
| 12 | Acquisitions Valuation report not valid at exchange of contracts  | 
      medium | 
| 13 | Insufficient evidence of good title over development land, and no defective title indemnity insurance in place | high | 
3. Development breaches
| Item number | Breach | Severity level | 
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Acquisition grant payment claimed in advance of need. This applies where the grant recipient did not have a freehold or long leasehold interest at the point when Acquisition grant was claimed  | 
      high | 
| 15 | Start on Site grant payment claimed in advance of need. This applies where, at date of Start on Site claim: • the works contract was not signed and/or dated by all parties • contractual possession was not passed to contractor • secure legal interest had not been obtained (for example no proof of ownership/lease/building under licence) • Start on Site works were not commenced according to CFG definition  | 
      high | 
| 16 | No form of building contract (or works orders for works carried out by internal Direct Labour Organisation or similar), where works sum exceeds £10K | high | 
| 17 | Adequate insurance arrangements to insure scheme for full cost of works not in place during development | medium | 
4. Post-development breaches
| Item number | Breach | Severity level | 
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Practical Completion grant payment claimed in advance of need: this applies where the final grant claim preceded Partial Possession/Practical Completion (as defined in the CFG) | high | 
| 19 | At Practical Completion grant claim: • there was no evidence of building regulations approval • there was no evidence of building regulations sign-off completion certificate • house builder warranty (National House Building Council or equivalent) final certificate not granted  | 
      high | 
| 20 | Pre-commencement conditions and planning conditions precedent (except landscaping) or other specified consents have not been signed off/discharged by Practical Completion, and there is no evidence that the provider: • has taken necessary steps to obtain them • is waiting only for the relevant authority to issue them and • is not aware of any reason why such consents will not be given or issued  | 
      medium | 
| 21 | Adequate insurance arrangements to insure scheme for its Full Replacement Value not in place after development | medium | 
| 22 | The number of units built is lower than the contractual commitment, and no variation has been agreed | high | 
| 23 | The built units achieve a lower standard than that contractually agreed, and no variation has been agreed | medium | 
| 24 | The occupancy levels are lower than the contractual commitment, and no variation has been agreed | medium | 
| 25 | Conditions relating to management agreements have not been complied with | medium | 
| 26 | 
Affordable and social rent The rents charged do not match the contractual commitments and/or programme requirements, and no variation has been agreed  | 
      medium | 
| 27 | 
Affordable and social rent Rents charged do not match those in IMS  | 
      medium | 
5. Sale breaches
| Item number | Breach | Severity level | 
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 
Shared ownership Lease does not include all of the required fundamental clauses set out in the Shared Ownership chapter of the Capital Funding Guide  | 
      medium | 
| 29 | 
Shared ownership Adherence to applicant eligibility and/or financial assessment policies not evidenced  | 
      medium | 
| 30 | 
Shared ownership Rents not calculated according to the requirements of the CFG  | 
      medium | 
| 31 | 
Shared ownership Rent not calculated as the relevant percentage of unsold equity set out at bid stage  | 
      medium | 
6. Specialised housing breaches
| Item number | Breach | Severity level | 
|---|---|---|
| 32 | Additional conditions not complied with, and no waiver sought | medium | 
| 33 | The contractual requirement to register a restriction on title with Land Registry, indicating a requirement to gain HCA consent to dispose, has not been met | medium | 
7. Additional breaches
| Item number | Breach | Severity level | 
|---|---|---|
| 34 | Other breach (including other funding conditions within contract not complied with) | low | 
| 35 | Other breach (including other funding conditions within contract not complied with) | medium | 
| 36 | Other breach (including other funding conditions within contract not complied with) | high | 
8. Voluntary right to buy breaches
| Item number | Breach | Severity level | 
|---|---|---|
| 37 | Relevant documents not evident  on file Data not evident on internal systems  | 
      low | 
| 38 | Systematic failure to evidence paperwork / data or adherence to procedures | medium | 
| 39 | Incorrect claim made for compensation, for example  wrong amount claimed in IMS in relation to actual discount calculated Claim for compensation made against a non-existent sale  | 
      high |