Decision

Notice by the Secretary of State under section 52 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949: Weybourne to Hunstanton

Published 9 July 2025

Applies to England

Introduction

On 21 March 2018, Natural England submitted a compendium of coastal access reports relating to the stretch of coast from Weybourne to Hunstanton to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs under section 51 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 (“the 1949 Act”), pursuant to its duty under section 296(1) of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 (“the 2009 Act”). 

This determination relates to lengths WBH1-6, which covers the entire stretch.

In reaching a determination under section 52 of the 1949 Act the Secretary of State has considered:

a. Weybourne to Hunstanton reports WBH1-6 – part of Natural England’s coastal access report compendium for the Isle of Wight submitted to the Secretary of State on 21 March 2018

b. in accordance with paragraph 16(1)(a) of the Schedule, the objections which the appointed person determined to be an admissible objection

c. in accordance with paragraph 16(1)(b) of the Schedule, Natural England’s comments on the admissible objections which it sent to the Secretary of State

d. in accordance with paragraph 16(1)(c) of the Schedule, the reports given to the Secretary of State by the appointed person in respect of the objections which the appointed person determined to be an admissible objection

e. in accordance with paragraph 16(1)(d) of the Schedule, representations made by a person within paragraph 2(2)(b) to (f) of the Schedule and the summary of other representations made, and Natural England’s comments on those representations which it sent to the Secretary of State in June 2020

f. Section 245 of the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023 imposes a duty upon the Secretary of State, when exercising any function which has any effect upon land in a an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty to seek to the further the purposes of those areas. In this case the creation of coastal access in and around these Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty may have an effect upon them. However, in making this decision the Secretary of State has sought to further the purpose of the conservation and enhancement of these Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty by satisfying itself that no harm will come to these areas as a result of the creation of the new coastal access.

In this notice –

(a)  “objection” means an objection about the coastal access report which is made under paragraph 3 of Schedule 20 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009; and

(b) “representation” means a representation about the coastal access report which is made under paragraph 7 of Schedule 20 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009.

Secretary of State’s approval of coastal access proposals

The Secretary of State has determined to approve those proposals for the route and associated coastal margin as set out in length reports WBH1 to WBH6 with slight modifications.

In the respects specified in the objection set out at Annex A to this notice, the Secretary of State determines that the proposals set out in the coastal access report do not fail to strike a “fair balance” as a result of the matters specified in the objections. The Secretary of State therefore approves the proposals set out in the coastal access report so far as they relate to those parts of the route (and associated coastal margin) to which the objection relates.   

Where proposals are approved in full, the additional conclusions and observations of the Secretary of State in relation to the representations are set out at Annex B to this notice.

The Secretary of State has made available at www.gov.uk:

a. a copy of this notice

b. the reports on the objections given to them by the appointed person

c. representations made by a person within paragraph 2(2)(b) to (f) of the Schedule, and Natural England’s comments on those representations, which it sent to the Secretary of State in May 2018

d. summary of other representations, and Natural England’s comments on those representations, which it sent to the Secretary of State in May 2018

Natural England has also made available here:

e. Weybourne to Hunstanton - the compendium of coastal access reports.

Annex A: Objections which did not fail to strike a “fair balance” 

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/52/WBH0234

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route sections WBH-2-S009 to WBH-2-S010. The Secretary of State notes the consideration and recommendation of the appointed person in regard to this objection and agrees with the inspector’s conclusion that the proposed sections of the King Charles III England Coast Path are unlikely to cause significant negative impacts concerning the issues raised around private land use and the necessity of the route. These concerns can be mitigated through the adjustment of the route if land use changes in the future. Also, the proposed route remains in good condition and is frequently used by the public, providing a more accessible and practical option than the alternative proposal to move the trail to a flood defence bank. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section.

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/68/WBH1072

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route sections WBH-2-S043 RD and WBH-2-S059. The Secretary of State notes that the objector raised concerns about the proposed exclusion of coastal access rights over this section of saltmarsh. The Secretary of State acknowledges that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed section 25A and section 26(3)(a) exclusions. Instead, informal management measures such as bespoke signage at access points to the saltmarsh will be introduced to warn people of the potential risks when accessing the area. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section with this modification in place.

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/50/WBH0088

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route sections WBH-3-S009 to WBH-3-S010, WBH-3-S004 to WBH-3-S006, and WBH-3-S003. The Secretary of State notes that the objector raised concerns regarding the inclusion of certain areas in the landward spreading room, the proposed exclusions of coastal access rights over saltmarsh and mudflats, as well as issues related to safety and the protection of wildlife. The Secretary of State acknowledges that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed section 25A (saltmarsh and flats unsuitable for public access) and section 26(3)(a) exclusions for these saltmarsh and mudflat areas. Instead, informal management measures such as bespoke signage at access points to the saltmarsh will be introduced to warn people of the potential risks when accessing the area. The Secretary of State also notes that NE has agreed to adjust the landward boundary between WBH-3-S004 and WBH-3-S006 to ensure consistency with other sections of the trail and has proposed realigning the trail near WBH-3-S003, relocating it away from the Beach Road car park. Furthermore, a year-round dog restriction will be introduced to safeguard sensitive areas. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section with these modifications in place.

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/61/WBH1125

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route section WBH-4-S015 FP. The Secretary of State notes that the objector raised concerns about the ambiguity of the landward boundary description. The Secretary of State acknowledges that Natural England has responded to these concerns by proposing a modification to clarify the boundary description, thus ensuring greater clarity for both landowners and walkers. Additionally, the surface description will also be updated to reflect conditions on the ground. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section with these modifications in place.

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/69/WBH0365

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route section WBH-4-S015 FP. The Secretary of State notes that the objector raised concerns about the ambiguity of the landward boundary description. The Secretary of State acknowledges that Natural England has responded to these concerns by proposing a modification to clarify the boundary description, thus ensuring greater clarity for both landowners and walkers. Additionally, the surface description will also be updated to reflect conditions on the ground. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section with these modifications in place.

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/18/WBH0879

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route section WBH-4-S024. The Secretary of State notes the consideration and recommendation of the appointed person in regard to this objection and agrees with the inspector’s conclusion that the proposed sections of the King Charles III England Coast Path are unlikely to cause significant negative impacts concerning the issues raised around encroachment on private land and commons rights. These concerns are addressed following confirmation that the route avoids private land, and that the coastal access rights over saltmarsh areas do not impact the objector’s common rights. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section.

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/75/WBH1144

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route sections WBH-5-S014RD to WBH-5-S018RD. The Secretary of State notes the consideration and recommendation of the appointed person in regard to this objection and agrees with the inspector’s conclusion that the proposed sections of the King Charles III England Coast Path are unlikely to cause significant negative impacts concerning the issues raised around safety and future land use. These concerns can be mitigated through the use of additional signage to alert drivers to walkers. Also, the trail’s alignment at WBH-5-S016 has been adjusted to minimise land impact, with a narrower width of 1.2 meters, and there are no restrictions preventing future development or land use changes. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section with these modifications in place.

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/49/WBH0121

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route section WBH-5-S019. The Secretary of State notes the consideration and recommendation of the appointed person in regard to this objection and agrees with the inspector’s conclusion that the proposed sections of the King Charles III England Coast Path are unlikely to cause significant negative impacts concerning the issues raised around land take, potential loss of agricultural income, crop contamination, and safety risks associated with farming operations. These concerns can be mitigated through the reduction in trail width to 1.2 metres and the use of signage to promote responsible dog ownership. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section with these modifications in place.

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/47/WBH0117

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route section WBH-5-S019. The Secretary of State notes the consideration and recommendation of the appointed person in regard to this objection and agrees with the inspector’s conclusion that the proposed sections of the King Charles III England Coast Path are unlikely to cause significant negative impacts concerning the issues raised around land take, potential loss of agricultural income, crop contamination, and safety risks associated with farming operations. The objector also suggested aligning the trail along the existing Norfolk Coast Path National Trail (NCPNT). The concerns raised can be mitigated through the reduction in trail width to 1.2 metres and the use of signage to promote responsible dog ownership. Also, aligning the trail along the existing NCPNT is inconvenient due to increased road walking and the proposed path adheres more closely to the coastline. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section with these modifications in place.

Objection Reference: MCA/Weybourne to Hunstanton/O/35/WBH0602

The land in the Report to which the objection relates is route section WBH-6-S002 FP. The Secretary of State notes that the objector raised concerns about the width of the proposed coastal margin and made the case for it to be realigned to reflect a repositioned fence. The Secretary of State acknowledges that Natural England has agreed to amend the landward boundary of the coastal margin to align with the new fence line. Consequently, the Secretary of State approves the proposals in relation to this route section with this modification in place.

Annex B: Conclusions and observations on representations

The Secretary of State has considered, in relation to the coastal access report, the following representations made under paragraph 7 of the Schedule.

Representation number:  MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\119\WBH0629

Organisation/ person making representation: Norfolk County Council [redacted]

Report chapter:  whole report, maps G, I, J, K & L

Route section(s) specific to this representation:  N/A

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes Norfolk County Council’s concerns regarding the proposed route alignments, infrastructure requirements, and the need for further improvements in certain sections. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed routes, including the use of existing footpaths, surfacing works, and the installation of waymark posts, are in line with the objectives of the Coastal Access Scheme, offer appropriate protection to sensitive environmental features, and ensure continued accessibility for the public, with necessary improvements being addressed through ongoing collaboration with the Council and relevant stakeholders.

Representation number:  MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\121\WBH0658

Organisation/ person making representation: Norfolk County Council [redacted]

Report chapter:  whole report

Route sections specific to this representation: N/A

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes Norfolk County Council’s concerns regarding discrepancies between the mapped and legal alignments of the Norfolk Coast Path. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that such inconsistencies are the result of coastal erosion or historic mapping anomalies, and notes that separate National Trail Variation Reports will be submitted to formally realign the Norfolk Coast Path with the King Charles III England Coast Path (KCIIIECP).

Representation number:  MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\120\WBH0795

Organisation/ person making representation: Norfolk Local Access Forum [redacted]

Report chapter:  whole report

Route sections specific to this representation:  N/A

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Norfolk Local Access Forum’s concerns regarding the consultation process, the budget to implement the proposals, surface improvements, and potential road crossing issues. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the consultation process was thorough, the initial budget is an estimate subject to further assessment, surface improvements are planned in key areas, and alternative routes and safety measures will be implemented in collaboration with local authorities and appropriate stakeholders.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\166\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter : Overview

Route section specific to this representation:  Map G on Page 39: proposed directions to exclude public access.  Land north and south of Stonemeal Creek

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as salt marshes and mudflats. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\167\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter: Overview

Route sections specific to this representation:  Map J on page: proposed directions to exclude public access.  Land north of Burnham Overy Staithe

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as salt marshes and mudflats. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\312\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter: Overview

Route sections specific to this representation:  Map L on page 44: proposed directions to exclude public access.  Holme Dunes

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusion of certain areas to allow entry charges, viewing it as unfair to the public. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the Holme Dunes Nature Reserve already had a land management exclusion established following the commencement of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R162\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter: Chapter 1

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-1-S001; WBH-1- S006; WBH-1-S007 to WBH-1-S008*; WBH-1-S009; WBH-1-S010

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the proposed path alignment following the shingle bank, which may be difficult for some users to navigate. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that extensive efforts were made to identify an alternative route, but none were suitable, and the proposed path is already well used.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R161\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapter 1

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-1-S018, WBH-1-S019, WBH-1-S020

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns that the proposed route deviates from a public footpath which provides a more direct and scenic coastal route, despite being currently obstructed. The Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position to realign the King Charles III England Coast Path to follow this route, while retaining the original inland route as an alternative.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R160\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapter 2

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-2-S001

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the deviation of the proposals from a more coastal route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the suggested route would require two bridges which was not justifiable in terms of cost. The Secretary of State notes that if the suggested route is restored to National Trail standards in the future, Natural England is open to varying the KCIIIECP to follow it.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\170\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter:   Chapter 2

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-2-S019 to WBH-2-S021

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns about the proposed route being more inland and further from the sea. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s view that it provides a drier, firmer path that helps protects the saltmarsh.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R158\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapter 3

Route sections specific to this representation:  proposed landward spreading room associated with WBH-3-S001 to WBH-3-S009

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the extent of the landward spreading room and the inclusion of land north of the Old Sea Wall. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the coastal grazing marsh does not fit within the default categories for coastal margin and cannot be included without landowner agreement.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R159\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter:   Chapter 3

Route sections specific to this representation:  proposed landward spreading room associated with WBH-3-S007 to WBH-3-S013

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the use of the fence line as the landward boundary instead of the outer boundary of the dunes. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the landward margin boundary is defined by existing physical features, such as the fence line, to provide clarity and cohesion for walkers.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R165\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapter 4

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-4-S024, SO26, SO28 and S030

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the limited width of a boardwalk between Brancaster Staithe and Beach Road. However, the Secretary of State notes that the boardwalk is due to be replaced by the local council and improved accessibility will be considered as part of this work.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R169\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter:   Chapter 5

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-5-S005

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the preference for a more coastal route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed alignment is more suitable as it remains accessible at all states of the tide, unlike the suggested alternative.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R163\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapter 5

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-5-S013 to WBH-5-S022

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the proposed route’s proximity to the A149, exposing walkers to traffic noise and pollution. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that only a short section of approximately 0.4 miles runs alongside the road, and that the overall route meets the requirements of the Coastal Access Scheme.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R168\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter:   Chapter 5

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-5-S023

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s suggestion to link the trail to a footpath which provides a more coastal experience. The Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position to realign the King Charles III England Coast Path to follow this route.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\164\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapter 5

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-5-S037 and WBH-5-S038

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding the proposed route deviating from the existing National Trail and their preference for a particular footpath at Holme-next-the-Sea. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed route offers a more accessible path, which is not subject to high tides.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\311\WBH0079

Organisation/ person making representation: Open Spaces Society  [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapter 6

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-6-S002

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Open Spaces Society’s concerns regarding a narrow dune ridge. The Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that waymarking and scrub clearance will bring the route to an appropriate standard for walkers.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\151\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter: Overview

Route sections specific to this representation:  part 7, capital costs

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the low cost estimates associated with the establishment of the route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the route largely follows the existing Norfolk Coast Path, which has been managed and maintained by the County Council with government funding. Final costings will also be calculated at the establishment stage, accounting for price increases and any necessary modifications.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\151\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter :  Chapter 1

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-1-S017, WBH-1-S018, WBH-1-S019, WBH-1-S020, WBH-1-S021

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the obstruction of a footpath at Cley-Next-the-Sea and the current route following the A149, which is unsafe and unpleasant for walkers. However, the Secretary of State notes that the Environment Agency has installed a 220-meter boardwalk between sections WBH-1-S016 to WBH-1-S022, which provides a more scenic route to the sea, and Natural England is happy to update the proposed route to incorporate this boardwalk. The Secretary of State agrees with Natural England’s proposal to modify the route while maintaining the original route when the boardwalk is inaccessible due to high tide.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\151\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapter 1

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-1-S006 to WBH-1-S010;  WBH-1-S012 to  WBH-1-S014

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the potential challenges of roll-back along the shingle route, their suggestion for an inland route to be formally designated, and the modification of steps to slopes to widen access on part of the route WBH-1-S013. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that normal roll-back is anticipated along this section and formal alternative routes can only be proposed where regular flooding or tidal issues affect the route, which is not the case here. Also, alternative routes can still be implemented if needed. Finally, the Secretary of State notes that the modification of steps to slopes at WBH-1-S013 could not be carried out due to the constraints of the location and proximity to the sea wall.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\152\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapter 1

Route sections specific to this representation:  Local restrictions and exclusions (1.3.9); See also Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal, North Norfolk Coast, Annex B, maps E and F

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ suggestion that exclusion zones relating to breeding birds and seals should be clearly marked or fenced to inform walkers, as well as their observation regarding the absence of similar restrictions at Horsey, where seal colonies are also present. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that appropriate signage will be used to identify restricted areas, and that formal measures are justified at Blakeney due to the absence of a local volunteer management group, unlike at Horsey.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\153\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapter 2

Route sections specific to this representation:  Local restrictions and exclusions (2.3.12); See also Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal, North Norfolk Coast, Annex B, map G

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the necessity of restrictions and exclusions on saltmarsh and mudflat areas. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\154\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter:   Chapter 2

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-2-S043 to WBH-2-S057

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding multiple road crossings and their suggestion for the route to remain on the seaward side. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that road crossings are necessary for safety due to narrow pavements on the seaward side.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\155\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter: Chapter 2

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-2-S009 to WBH-2-S010; WBH-2-S012 to WBH-2-S015; WBH-2-S018 to WBH-2-S022; WBH-2-S019 to WBH-2-S021

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the regular vehicle use of the Byway Open to All Traffic (BOAT) and their suggestion to route the path within the margin to separate walkers from traffic. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the route generally follows the existing Norfolk Coast Path and stays adjacent to the BOAT. Signage will also be provided at crossing points to enhance safety.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\156\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapter 3

Route sections specific to this representation:  Local restrictions and exclusions (3.3.10); See also Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal, North Norfolk Coast, Annex B, maps H, I and J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ suggestion for clear marking or fencing of restricted areas for breeding birds and their concerns regarding the restrictions in areas deemed unsuitable for public access.  The Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions associated with Map J. However, the Secretary of State concludes that the restrictions and exclusions associated with Maps H and I are necessary and justified to ensure the protection of sensitive habitats and species.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\157\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter :  Chapter 3

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-3-S003; WBH-3-S004 to WBH-3-S006;

WBH-3-S007 to WBH-3-S012

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the proposed route passing through a car park rather than using the established woodland path to avoid potential conflict with vehicles. The Secretary of State acknowledges that Natural England has proposed a modification to align the route along the edge of the woodland and supports this modification.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\187\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapter 4

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-4-S012 to WBH-4-S014; WBH-4-S019

WBH-4-S024, S026, S028 and S030

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the narrow width of the existing boardwalk between WBH-4-S022 to WBH-4-S030. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the boardwalk is currently closed for safety reasons and that the local council intends to replace it, taking into account options for improved accessibility.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\188\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapter 5

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-5-S014 to WBH-5-S020; WBH-5-S020 to WBH-5-S023; WBH-5-S020; WBH-5-S023 to WBH-5-S025

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the route going along the A149 and a narrow footway. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed route has been carefully considered for safety, and that additional signage and a modification to the route will address the concerns raised. The Secretary of State supports this modification, which involves adjusting the alignment between WBH-5-S023 and WBH-5-S025 to follow an existing path further north, providing better coastal views while keeping walkers away from the roadside.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\304\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapter 5

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-5-S002 to WBH-5-S023; WBH-5-S002 to WBH-5-S003; WBH-5-S005; WBH-5-S008; WBH-5-S009; WBH-5-S010 ; WBH-5-S011 to WBH-5-S012

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the proposed route at WBH-5-S005 and the condition of sections WBH-5-S008 to WBH-5-S012. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed route at WBH-5-S005 offers year-round accessibility, as it remains passable regardless of tidal conditions. Improvements will also be made to sections WBH-5-S008 to WBH-5-S012, including the installation of a boardwalk to address ground conditions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\305\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapter 5

Route sections specific to this representation:  Chapter 5, local restrictions and exclusions (5.3.11); See also Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal, North Norfolk Coast, Annex B, maps K and L

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State acknowledges the representation’s support for the restrictions relating to breeding birds and dog control measures.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\306\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapter 6

Route sections specific to this representation:  WBH-6-S002

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Ramblers’ concerns regarding the narrow dune ridge and surface conditions. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that waymarking and scrub clearance will address these issues.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\309\WBH0013

Organisation/ person making representation: The Ramblers  [redacted]

Report chapter:   Chapter 6

Route sections specific to this representation:  local restrictions and exclusions (6.3.6); See also Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal, North Norfolk Coast, Annex B, map L

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State acknowledges the representation’s support for the restrictions relating to breeding birds and dog control measures.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\178\WBH1008

Organisation/ person making representation: RSPB  [redacted]

Report chapter:   whole report

Route sections specific to this representation:  The comments relate in part to the RSPB Titchwell nature reserve.

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the RSPB’s concerns regarding the disturbance to nesting and roosting species due to higher visitor numbers. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal concluded that the proposals are unlikely to significantly change visitor behaviour or access patterns.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\13\WBH0840

Organisation/ person making representation: Burnham Overy & Norton Wildfowlers Association [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapter 3

Route sections specific to this representation:  Map J, Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal Chapter 3 page 10.

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Burnham Overy & Norton Wildfowlers Association’s concerns regarding the inaccurate use of the term “formal car park” at Burnham Overy Staithe. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has agreed to stop using this term and will instead refer to it as a free parking area.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\283\WBH1081

Organisation/ person making representation: Brancaster Common Right Holders Gun Club  [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapters 3 & 4

Route sections specific to this representation:  Map J, Burham Overy Staithe Marshes shown in red

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Brancaster Common Rights Holders Gun Club’s concerns regarding the negative impact of the proposed exclusions on country pursuits. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\181\WBH0807

Organisation/ person making representation: Environment Agency  [redacted]

Report chapter : N/A

Route sections specific to this representation: N/A

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Environment Agency’s concerns regarding the impact of the proposals on flood defences. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position on continued collaboration with the Environment Agency and the potential need for a Flood Risk Activity permit to be conducted during establishment work.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\6\WBH0818

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:   Chapters 1, WBH-1-S012 to S014; and WBH-1-S016 to S022; and Map 1e

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the use of steps at certain points along the route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that geographical and practical constraints prevent the removal of these features. The Secretary of State also notes that the Environment Agency has constructed a boardwalk in this area, and Natural England recommend a modification to align the KCIIIECP with this boardwalk, retaining sections WBH-1-S017 to WBH-2-S021 as an optional alternative route. The Secretary of State supports this modification.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\60\WBH0901

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Norfolk Wildlife Trust

Report chapter:   Chapters 1, Maps 1b, 1c & 1d

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
Secretary of State notes the Norfolk Wildlife Trust’s concerns regarding disturbance to shore-nesting birds due to higher visitor numbers. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed route is unlikely to cause a significant change in visitor numbers and behaviour, and that informal fencing and signage already in place will mitigate these concerns.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\77\WBH0060

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Blakeney Parish Council

Report chapter:  Chapters 1, 2, Map A; Land between Friary Farm Caravan Park, Back Lane, Blakeney and Wiveton Hall Café, Coast Road, Cley.

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Blakeney Parish Council’s concerns regarding potential future damage to the path and their suggestion for an inland alternative route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that an optional alternative route is not appropriate, as the section is not affected by regular flooding, and future changes can be addressed through rollback powers.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\130\WBH0987

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapters 1, 2, Maps E, F, G

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding access restrictions. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed access restrictions laid out in Maps E and F are supported by an Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal. Regarding the saltmarsh and mudflat exclusions referenced by the representation and laid out in Map G, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn those proposed exclusions.

Representation number:  MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\149WBH0800

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Norfolk National Trail Partnership

Report chapter : Chapters 1-6, Map G,J,K,L

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Norfolk National Trail Partnership’s concerns regarding the adequacy of funding for the route, road walking, and the proposed exclusions. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that costs will be recalculated during the establishment phase and the road crossings align with the guidance of the Coastal Access Scheme. Also, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\173\WBH0075

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], National Trust

Report chapter:  Chapters 1, 2, 4, 5, Map E, Map F, Map 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f, 4a, 4c, 4d, 4e, 5a,5d

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the National Trust’s concerns regarding the potential impact of increased visitors on vulnerable habitats and species. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that mitigation plans will be developed with the National Trust.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\175\WBH0919

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Clerk to Cley next the Sea Parish Council

Report chapter : Chapter 1. Overview Map E, F and G – pages 37 and pages 38 of the overview document.

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Clerk to Cley next the Sea Parish Council’s concerns regarding the proposed access restrictions and the consultation process. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the consultation process followed legal requirements, including efforts to notify all relevant parties. Also, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\186\WBH0886

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Norfolk Coast Partnership

Report chapter : Chapters 1-6, Map 2i and Map 5b

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Norfolk Coast Partnership’s concerns regarding the long-term viability of some sections of the route, the need for alternative routes, and other issues. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed route and management strategies are in line with the Coastal Access Scheme. Additionally, measures to ensure public safety, landscape protection, and accessibility have been sufficiently addressed in the proposals. Also, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\216\WBH1107

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter : All general aspects

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as salt marshes and mudflats. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\248\WBH1050

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted] & [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapters 1 – 6, Chapter 1 maps 1a to 1e, Overview maps G, J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the potential damage to the shingle ridge, the advance approval of rollback measures, and the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as salt marshes and mudflats. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposals make use of the existing Norfolk Coast Path National Trail, ensuring no significant change to access patterns. The rollback measures will allow for future flexibility without the need for further reference to the Secretary of State, Also, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\276\WBH1073

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapters 1 to 6

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as salt marshes and mudflats. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\278\WBH1075

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapters 1 – 6

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed route crossings at Wells-next-the-Sea and the use of a busy footway on the A149 near Titchwell Nature Reserve. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed routes are designed to ensure safety and convenience with necessary adjustments being made where required. Also, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\298\WBH1133

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Girlguiding Anglia & Norfolk Trefoil Guild

Report chapter:  Chapter 1

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representations concerns regarding the lack of an alternative route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that alternative routes can only be provided when access to the ordinary route is affected by circumstances such as tidal inundation, which does not apply in this case.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\9\WBH0826

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter: Chapter 2, Map 2d, Chapter 2 Morston to Stiffkey

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s request to secure equestrian rights along specific parts of the proposed path. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that its duty under the Coastal Access Scheme is limited to walking access.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\180\WBH0088

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Holkham Estate (Holkham Nature Reserve Ltd)

Report chapter : Chapters 2, 3, 4 (WBH-2-S035-FP to WBH-4 S010 FP)

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes Holkham Estate’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of areas such as saltmarsh and mudflats, and the local misunderstanding that these exclusions were requested by the Estate. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions and has also apologised for the misunderstanding.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\243\WBH1045

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter :  Chapters 2, 3; Maps G, I, J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of areas such as saltmarsh and mudflats, as well as the potential storm and tide damage to fences in parts of the route. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions. The Secretary of State also notes that the installation and maintenance of the fencing at Holkham National Nature Reserve will be managed by the site managers, and any storm or tide damage will be addressed by them.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\297\WBH1072

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Wells Sailing Club

Report chapter:  Chapters 2, Map G, Maps 2i

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as saltmarshes and mudflats, as well as the points raised about the lack of consultation. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions. The Secretary of State also notes that there was an extensive consultation process, engaging key organisations, landowners, and other legal interests through letters, drop-in sessions, and public notices. Natural England did not identify Wells Sailing Club as a relevant local interest group, as boating is unaffected, but did consult Wells Town Council during the draft and publication stages in 2015 and 2018.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\303\WBH0486

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapters 2, 3, Maps G, I, J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of areas such as saltmarsh and mudflats, as well as requests for clarification on fence maintenance in parts of the route. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions. The Secretary of State also notes that the installation and maintenance of the fencing will be managed by the site managers.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\3\WBH0225

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapters 3 WBH-3-S010 & WBH-3-S011

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding seasonal restrictions at Holkham Bay. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed restrictions are necessary and proportionate to protect sensitive bird populations.

Representation number:  MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\4\WBH0225; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\8\WBH0825; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\10\WBH0828; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\11\WBH0831; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\12\WBH0832; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\15\WBH0841; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\16\WBH0848; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\18\WBH0850; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\19\WBH0851; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\20\WBH0852; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\21\WBH0853; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\22\WBH0854; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\23\WBH0855; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\24\WBH0856; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\25\WBH0857; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\26\WBH0858; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\28\WBH0860; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\30\WBH0862; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\31\WBH0863; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\32\WBH0864; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\33\WBH0865; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\34\WBH0866; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\36\WBH0867; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\37\WBH0869; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\38\WBH0872; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\39\WBH0871; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\40\WBH0372; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\41\WBH0874; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\42\WBH0875; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\43\WBH0876; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\44\WBH0877; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\45\WBH0883; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\46WBH0884; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\47WBH0887; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\48WBH0892; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\51\WBH0820; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\53\WBH0307; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\54\WBH0374; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\55\WBH0896; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\56\WBH0897; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\57WBH0898; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\58\WBH0899; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\59\WBH0900; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\63\WBH0903; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\64\WBH0904; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\65\WBH0905; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\68\WBH0845; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\69\WBH0910; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\70\WBH0911; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\72\WBH0913; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\73\WBH0914; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\74\WBH0915; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\75\WBH0916; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\76\WBH0921; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\78\WBH0930; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\79\WBH0922; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\80\WBH0931; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\81\WBH0923; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\82\WBH0925; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\83\WBH0926; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\84\WBH0927; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\86\WBH0928; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\87\WBH0932; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\88\WBH0933; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\89\WBH0934; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\90\WBH0935; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\91\WBH0936; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\92\WBH0937; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\93\WBH0940; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\94\WBH0941; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\95\WBH0942; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\96\WBH0944; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\97\WBH0946; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\99\WBH0949; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\100\WBH0950; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\101\WBH0951; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\102\WBH0954; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\103\WBH0955; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\104\WBH0956; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\105\WBH0957; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\106\WBH0959; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\107\WBH0958; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\108\WBH0960; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\109\WBH0961; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\110\WBH0965; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\114\WBH0968; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\118\WBH0972; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\123\WBH0975; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\124\WBH0976; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\126\WBH0978; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\127\WBH0979; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\128\WBH0980; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\129\WBH0982; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\131\WBH0988; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\132\WBH0989; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\133\WBH0990; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\134\WBH0991; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\135\WBH0992; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\136\WBH0993; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\137\WBH0994; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\138\WBH0995; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\143\WBH1000; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\144\WBH1001; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\145\WBH1002; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\146\WBH1003; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\147\WBH1004; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\148\WBH1005; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\171\WBH0962; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\172\WBH0963; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\183\WBH1010; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\185\WBH0239; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\189\WBH1014; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\190\WBH1015; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\198\WBH1025; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\199\WBH1026; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\200\WBH1027; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\201\WBH1028; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\202\WBH1029; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\203\WBH1030; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\204\WBH1031; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\205\WBH1032; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\206\WBH1033; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\208\WBH1035; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\210\WBH1101; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\212\WBH1103; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\215\WBH1106; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\218\WBH1109; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\219\WBH1110; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\223\WBH1115; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\230\WBH1122; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\231\WBH1123; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\232\WBH1124; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\234\WBH1128; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\236\WBH1038; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\237\WBH1039; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\238\WBH1040; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\239\WBH1041; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\240\WBH1042; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\244\WBH1046; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\245\WBH1047; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\246\WBH1048; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\247\WBH1049; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\249\WBH1051; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\250\WBH1052; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\251\WBH1053; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\256\WBH1058; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\257\WBH1059; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\258\WBH1060; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\264\WBH1129; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\265\WBH1130; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\268\WBH1135; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\273\WBH1069; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\275\WBH1071; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\279\WBH1076; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\280\WBH1077; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\281\WBH1078; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\282\WBH1080; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\284\WBH1082; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\285\WBH1083; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\286\WBH1084; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\287\WBH1085; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\289\WBH1087; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\290\WBH1088; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\313\WBH1141; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\1\WBH0811; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\2\WBH0813; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\5\WBH0225; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\7\WBH0819; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\27\WBH0859; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\49WBH0893; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\50\WBH0894; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\66\WBH0907; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\67\WBH0908; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\71\WBH0912; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\98\WBH0947; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\111\WBH0966; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\112\WBH0967; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\125WBH0977; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\139\WBH0996; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\140\WBH0997; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\142\WBH0999; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\184\WBH0063; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\191\WBH1016; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\192\WBH1017; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\225\WBH1117; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\226\WBH1118; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\252\WBH1054; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\255\WBH1057; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\267\WBH1134; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\269\WBH1136; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\288\WBH1086; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\277\WBH1074; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\272\WBH1068; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\270\WBH1066; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\263\WBH1065; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\261\WBH1063; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\260\WBH1062; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\259\WBH1061; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\266\WBH1132; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\211\WBH1102; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\17\WBH0849; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\262\WBH1064; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\294\WBH1094

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapter 3, 4, Map J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as salt marshes and mudflats. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\14\WBH0058

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Burnham Overy Parish Council

Report chapter : Chapter 3, Map J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the Clerk to Burnham Overy Parish Council’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions, the reference to a “formal car park” at Burnham Overy Staithe, and the need for clearer signage restricting use of the footpath at WBH-3-S014FP to walkers only. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has agreed to stop using this term and will instead refer to it as a free parking area. Additional signage clarifying appropriate use of the footpath at WBH-3-3S014FP can be provided if needed. Also, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\52\WBH0895

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter : Chapters 3,  Map J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions, the reference to a “formal car park” at Burnham Overy Staithe. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has agreed to stop using this term and will instead refer to it as a free parking area. Also, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\85\WBH0938

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:   Chapters 3, 4, Map J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the historical public use of the Cockle Path and Gun Hill beach and the negative impact of the proposed exclusions. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions. Signage will still be installed to inform the public of protected areas.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\115\WBH0969; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\116\WBH0970; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\117\WBH0971; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\122\WBH0974; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\141\WBH0998; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\177\WBH1007; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\207\WBH1034; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\220\WBH1112; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\222\WBH1114; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\253\WBH1055; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\254\WBH1034; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\274\WBH1070; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\213\WBH1104; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\227\WBH1119; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\228\WBH1120; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\235\WBH1036; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\241\WBH1043; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\242\WBH1044; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\291\WBH1090; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\292\WBH1092; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\293\WBH1093; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\302\WBH0523; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\182\WBH0808; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\233\WBH1127; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\295\WBH1023; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\301\WBH0500; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\229\WBH1121; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\224\WBH1116; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\221\WBH1113; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\193\WBH1019; MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\197\WBH1024

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:   Chapters 3, 4, Map J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as saltmarshes and mudflats, as well as the points raised about the lack of consultation. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions. The Secretary of State also notes that there was an extensive consultation process, engaging key organisations, landowners, and other legal interests through letters, drop-in sessions, and public notices.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\209\WBH1095

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapters 3, 4, 5, Maps G, J, L

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as saltmarshes and mudflats, as well as the points raised about the lack of consultation. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions. The Secretary of State also notes that Natural England undertook an extensive consultation process, engaging key organisations, landowners, and legal interests through letters, drop-in sessions, and public notices. In this specific case, direct contact was not made as the individual lives approximately two miles from the proposed route.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\214\WBH1105

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapters 3, 4, 5, Maps J, K

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as saltmarshes and mudflats, as well as the points raised about the lack of consultation. The representation also highlights concerns about the proposed restrictions on dogs. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions on the saltmarshes and mudflats. The Secretary of State also notes that there was an extensive consultation process, engaging key organisations, landowners, and other legal interests through letters, drop-in sessions, and public notices. The restrictions on dogs are necessary to protect ground-nesting birds and are in line with the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\217\WBH1108

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter :  Chapters 3, 4, Map J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as saltmarshes and mudflats, as well as the points raised about the lack of consultation. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions. The Secretary of State also notes that there was an extensive consultation process, engaging key organisations, landowners, and other legal interests through letters, drop-in sessions, and public notices. In this case, the representor’s address was over 20 miles from the proposed route and was therefore not directly consulted. Landowners in Overy Staithe were contacted, and the proposals were discussed by the local Parish Council in September 2015 and April 2018.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\299\WBH1133

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Girlguiding Anglia & Norfolk Trefoil Guild

Report chapter : Chapters 3, Maps H, I

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed seasonal exclusions at Holkham Bay and the potential risks to public safety. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed restrictions are necessary and proportionate to protect sensitive nesting bird populations, and that the use of fencing will not pose a risk to walkers.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\308\WBH1138

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted]

Report chapter: Chapters 3, 4, Map J

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as saltmarshes, mudflats, and Titchwell Marsh Nature Reserve. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions relating to saltmarshes and mudflats. In relation to Titchwell Marsh Nature Reserve, the Secretary of State notes that the proposed restrictions reflect existing site management measures and do not affect existing public rights of way.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\35\WBH0834

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Deepdale Backpackers & Camping / Dalegate Market

Report chapter:  Chapter 4

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access over certain areas such as saltmarshes and mudflats, as well as the condition and accessibility of the route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the saltmarsh exclusions have since been withdrawn, the surface of the existing trail has been improved, and accessibility enhancements such as the proposed removal of a stile have been proposed.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\176\WBH0885

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], The Wash and North Norfolk Marine Partnership

Report chapter:  Chapter 4

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access to certain areas, such as saltmarshes and mudflats, as well as the omission of the North Norfolk Advisory Group (NNAG) from the consultation process. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the saltmarsh exclusions have since been withdrawn and that the NNAG was regularly engaged throughout the process, with its exclusion from the report being the result of an administrative error, for which Natural England apologises.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\29\WBH0050

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Holme-next-the-Sea Parish Council

Report chapter:  Chapters 5, 6, Map 5e

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes Holme-next-the-Sea Parish Council’s concerns regarding the potential impact of increased visitor numbers on dunes which act as important sea defences. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed route will not significantly change visitor patterns, and that the dunes’ role in sea defence will not be compromised following consultation with the Environment Agency.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\61\WBH0901

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Norfolk Wildlife Trust

Report chapter:  Chapters 5, Maps 5d, 5e Access and Sensitive Features Appraisal, Annex B map L

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State acknowledges the Norfolk Wildlife Trust’s endorsement of the proposed exclusions and restrictions and thanks them for their positive feedback. 

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\113\WBH0498

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted] & [redacted]

Report chapter:  Chapters 5, WBH-5-S008 to WBH-5-S012 Map 5a  Map 5b   Map K

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding privacy, environmental disturbance, and the impracticality of the proposed route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed route remains closer to the coast, has been assessed for environmental sensitivity, includes appropriate mitigation such as a boardwalk in boggy areas, and encourages responsible use through adherence to the Countryside Code.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\174\WBH0054

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Titchwell Parish Meeting

Report chapter :  Chapters 5, Map 5b

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the adequacy of the existing inland path, safety, and the lack of consultation for the proposed route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed route offers better coastal access under the criteria of the Coastal Access Scheme. The Secretary of State also notes that the Highways Authority reviewed the road crossings with no objections, and the Parish Council was invited to comment in Summer 2015 but did not respond.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\179\WBH0613

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Brancaster Parish Council

Report chapter : Chapters 5, Map section 4. Brancaster. Parish of Brancaster

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes Brancaster Parish Council’s concerns regarding the proposed exclusions of public access to certain areas, such as saltmarshes and mudflats, the lack of consultation, and the condition of the proposed route. However, the Secretary of State notes that Natural England has since withdrawn the proposed exclusions. The Secretary of State also notes that there was an extensive consultation process, engaging key organisations, landowners, and other legal interests through letters, drop-in sessions, and public notices. The route will be maintained and managed to National Trail standards once established.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\300\WBH1133

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Girlguiding Anglia & Norfolk Trefoil Guild

Report chapter :  Chapters 5, Map 5d and Map 5e. Overview Map L

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
The Secretary of State notes the representation’s concerns regarding the potential loss of access to the Firs Café and Visitor Centre due to changes in the proposed route. However, the Secretary of State supports Natural England’s position that the proposed route and management measures will have no impact on access to the café and are consistent with existing onsite management practices.

Representation number:    MCA\Weybourne to Hunstanton\R\62\WBH0901

Organisation/ person making representation: [redacted], Norfolk Wildlife Trust

Report chapter :  Chapters 6, Map 6a

Secretary of State’s conclusion and observation:
Secretary of State acknowledges the Norfolk Wildlife Trust’s endorsement of the proposed route and thanks them for their positive feedback.