GOV.UK
Closed consultation
UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations: National user manual, conjunctivitis
- From:
- Public Health England
- Published:
- 21 October 2016
- Last updated:
- 14 December 2016, see all updates
We are analysing your feedback
Visit this page again soon to download the outcome to this public feedback.
Feedback received
Review of users' comments: first consultation November 2016
Published: PDF, 403KB, 9 pages
Detail of feedback received
Timeline of review process
Date review started: 14 April 2016
First consultation: 24 October 2016 to 4 November 2016
Second consultation: 15 March 2017 to 29 March 2017
Document discussed at the following working group meetings:
- 14 April 2016
- 17 November 2016
- 12 April 2017
This consultation ran from
to
Summary
This consultation asks for questions in relation to the national user manual SMI conjunctivitis.
Documents
National user manual, conjunctivitis closed consultation draft
Ref: PHE publication gateway number: 2016401 PDF, 1.14MB, 17 pages
National user manual, conjunctivitis closed consultation draft
Ref: PHE publication gateway number: 2016401 MS Word Document, 1.19MB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@phe.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
Consultation description
Public Health England has opened a consultation this week in joint partnership with professional organisations.
This consultation asks for feedback in relation to two worked examples of the Standards for Microbiology Investigations populated national user manual template, one for urine and one for conjunctivitis.
The working group would like to know your thoughts on how you think template works for these two examples.
- Is the template populated with enough/right kind of information for the examples used?
- Do you think that there is too much information in the document?
- What advantages does the syndromic approach have over the sample type approach and vice versa?
- Overall, which approach would be most useful for your users?
- Does seeing a worked example help you know how best to use the national user manual template?
- Would you prefer to see the syndrome/sample specific information as a separate section within individual UK SMIs (if this initiative is taken forward)?
- Any other comments you wish to make.
Share this page
Document information
Published: 21 October 2016
Updated: 14 December 2016
- Added review of users' comments first consultation November 2016.
- First published.
From: Public Health England