Equality Act 2010: consultation on repeal of two enforcement provisions
- From:
- Government Equalities Office, Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (2017 to 2023) and Immigration Enforcement
- Published:
- 15 May 2012
Read the full outcome
Government response - Equality Act 2010: employment tribunals’ power to make wider recommendations in discrimination cases and obtaining information procedure
PDF, 356 KB, 24 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
ACAS response
MS Word Document, 112 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
AFSA response
MS Word Document, 51 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Association of Scottish Police Superintendants response
MS Word Document, 282 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
ATL response
MS Word Document, 71.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Association of Women Solicitors response
MS Word Document, 244 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
BLS response
MS Word Document, 54.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
British Retail Consortium response
MS Word Document, 88 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Citizen's Advice Bureau response
MS Word Document, 57 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
CAGS response
MS Word Document, 23.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Chesterfield Borough Council response
MS Word Document, 45.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Cloisters response
MS Word Document, 30 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Capability Scotland response
MS Word Document, 83.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
CWU response
MS Word Document, 50.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Disability Charities Consortium response
MS Word Document, 64.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Discrimination Law Association response - obtaining information
PDF, 228 KB, 16 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Discrimination Law Association response - wider recommendations
PDF, 152 KB, 12 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Disability Law Service response
MS Word Document, 63 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Diversity Network for Cornwall response
MS Word Document, 58 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Equality and Diversity Forum response
MS Word Document, 151 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
EEF response
MS Word Document, 31.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Equality and Human Rights Commission response
MS Word Document, 106 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Employment Lawyers' Association response
MS Word Document, 624 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Employment Law Bar Association response
MS Word Document, 54 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Equanomics response
MS Word Document, 114 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
FDA response
MS Word Document, 65.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
GIRES response
MS Word Document, 34 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
GMB response
MS Word Document, 2.35 MB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Hearing Dogs for Deaf People response
MS Word Document, 814 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Insitute of Directors response
MS Word Document, 34.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
LGA response
MS Word Document, 31.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
LGF response
MS Word Document, 44 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Law Society response
MS Word Document, 47 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Law Society of Scotland response
PDF, 117 KB, 6 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Lyons Davidson response
MS Word Document, 43.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Mercer response
PDF, 589 KB, 2 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Metropolitan Police Service response
MS Word Document, 42.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
National AIDS Trust response
MS Word Document, 30 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service response
MS Word Document, 32 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
NHS employers response
MS Word Document, 43.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
National LGB&T Partnership response
MS Word Document, 107 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
NUT response
MS Word Document, 175 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Odysseus response
MS Word Document, 55 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Open University response
MS Word Document, 128 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
PCS response
MS Word Document, 62.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Police Federation of England and Wales response
PDF, 3.71 MB, 13 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
President and Regional Employment Judges of Employment Tribunals response
PDF, 1.14 MB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Prospect response
MS Word Document, 101 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Reformed Churches Caucus response
MS Word Document, 29 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Royal College of Midwives response
PDF, 307 KB, 5 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Royal College of Nursing response
PDF, 2.22 MB, 6 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
REDP response
MS Word Document, 51 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Royal National Institue for Blind People response
MS Word Document, 190 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
SDLA response
PDF, 2.04 MB, 14 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Squire Sanders response
MS Word Document, 35 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Scottish TUC response
PDF, 212 KB, 10 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Thompsons response
MS Word Document, 171 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Travers Smith response
MS Word Document, 47 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
TSSA response
MS Word Document, 131 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
TUC response
MS Word Document, 130 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Unison response
MS Word Document, 47.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Unite response
MS Word Document, 38.5 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
University of Leicester response
MS Word Document, 29 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
WBG response
MS Word Document, 34 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Working Families response
MS Word Document, 109 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Women's Resource Centre response
MS Word Document, 50 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Detail of outcome
Original consultation
Summary
We asked for your views on repealing two enforcement provisions of the Equality Act, as part of the Red Tape Challenge.
This consultation ran from
to
Consultation description
Following a review of equalities legislation under the Red Tape Challenge, the consultation sought views on proposals to repeal the following two measures from the Equality Act 2010:
- employment tribunals’ power to make wider recommendations in discrimination cases
- the procedure for obtaining information
Consultation response
We received a total of 157 responses to both proposals. Of those, 18 (12 per cent) were in favour of repealing the wider recommendations provisions, and 125 (79 per cent) were opposed. 24 (15 per cent) were in favour of repealing the obtaining information provisions and 130 (83 per cent) were opposed.
All business representative organisations supported repeal. Responses which agreed to the proposed repeals came mostly from private and not-for-profit sector employers and business representative organisations. Responses which disagreed with our proposals were mainly on behalf of unions, equality lobby groups, staff associations, the judiciary and members of the public.
Very few of the responses to this consultation, both those opposed to and those in favour of repeal provided little quantifiable evidence or specific evidence based on actual situations and outcomes, to support their views.
The government responses detailing the next steps to implement these proposals, together with the two impact assessments, are now available to download below. You can also read the government response to the consultation on employer liability for harrassment of employees by third parties, as well as an impact assessment.
Information about responding to the original consultation
Intended audience: This consultation will be of particular interest to:
- individual businesses and employers’ organisations
- people who provide goods and services
- trade unions
- equality organisations
- members of employment tribunals and the judiciary more widely
- individuals
Documents
Obtaining information impact assessment
PDF, 210 KB, 13 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Repeal of enforcement provisions - wider recommendations impact assessment
PDF, 206 KB, 15 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Share this page
The following links open in a new tab