Consultation outcome

Algorithms, competition and consumer harm: call for information

This consultation has concluded

Download the full outcome

Summary of responses to algorithms paper

Detail of outcome

Feedback received

Ada Lovelace Institute

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Alexander MacKay (Harvard Business School) and Zach Brown (University of Michigan)

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

British Brands Group

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

CarnegieUK

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Competition Law Forum at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Compliance and Accountable Systems research group, Department Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

DMG Media

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Dr Bruce Wardhaugh, The University of Manchester School of Law

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

European Competition Lawyers Forum

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Facebook

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Google

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

IBM

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Just Algorithms Action Group

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Kelkoo group

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

medConfidential

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Nicolo Zingales

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Ombudsman Services

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Professor Nik Lomax and Dr Stephen Clark, University of Leeds

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Reset

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

The Antitrust Law Section and the International Law Section of the American Bar Association

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

The Law Society of Scotland

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Uber

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

UK Computing Research Committee

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

UK Finance

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

UKRI Trustworthy Autonomous Systems Hub

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Which?

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Yoti

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Detail of feedback received

The CMA received 27 responses to the consultation.


Original consultation

Summary

The CMA is inviting views and evidence on the harms outlined in its paper on algorithms and information on specific issues with firms that the CMA could examine and consider for future action.

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

The CMA has published a paper on ‘Algorithms: How they can reduce competition and harm consumers’. Respondents should refer to the relevant parts of the paper when considering the questions below.

We will use the responses from this call for information to inform and enhance our analysing algorithms programme.

As we develop our approach to investigating, mitigating and remedying the harms outlined in the paper, we invite responses to the following questions:

  1. Are the potential harms set out in the review paper the right ones to focus on for our algorithms programme? Are there others that we have not covered that deserve attention?
  2. Do you agree with how we have described each harm, and are there other examples that demonstrate them in addition to the examples we have included?
  3. How likely and impactful are the identified harms now, and how might they evolve in the next few years?
  4. Are there specific examples that we should investigate further to consider whether they are particularly harmful and potentially breaching consumer or competition law?
  5. Are there any examples of techniques that we should be aware of or that we should consider beyond those that we’ve outlined?
  6. Are there other examples where competition or consumer agencies have interrogated algorithms that we have not included?
  7. Is the role of regulators in addressing the harms we set out in the paper feasible, effective and proportionate?
  8. Are there other ideas or approaches that we should consider as part of our role?

Questions 1 to 4 refer to Section 2 of the algorithms paper, questions 5 and 6 relate to Section 3 and questions 7 and 8 refer to Section 4.

We also invite academics or other organisations who would be interested in collaborating on our algorithms programme to contact us.

Next steps

In providing responses, please say whether you are an individual or a business, or if you represent consumer or business interests. Please provide your name and email address and indicate whether you would be happy for us to follow-up with you.

Please note that we are unable to provide advice on individual complaints. Our website provides links to sources of advice, information and support.

We will be publishing on our website responses from businesses and other organisations. In providing responses, please:

  • provide a brief summary of the interest or organisation that you represent, where appropriate
  • state whether you are providing any material that you consider to be confidential and explain why this is the case
  • provide both confidential version and a non-confidential version for publication of your response

Documents

Published 19 January 2021
Last updated 18 June 2021 + show all updates
  1. Additional response to consultation published.

  2. Responses to the consultation published.

  3. Summary of responses to the consultation published.

  4. First published.