Reviewing our approach to assessing merger efficiencies
Updates to this page
- From:
- Competition and Markets Authority
- Published:
- 15 January 2026
- Last updated:
-
3 June 2026
Show all updates
-
Responses published
-
First published.
-
Detail of outcome
The CMA consulted on draft revised guidance on our approach to assessing rivalry-enhancing efficencies in merger cases.
Taking into account the feedback to that consultation, we published updated merger assessment guidelines which incorporate our final revised efficiencies guidance.
Original call for evidence
Summary
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) invited views on its approach to assessing rivalry-enhancing efficiencies in mergers.
This call for evidence ran from
to
Call for evidence description
The CMA has been delivering a programme of work to embed our 4Ps framework – pace, predictability, proportionality, and process – across our merger control function. In October 2025, we published updated guidance on our approach to jurisdiction and procedure, to clarify our approach to jurisdiction and global deals. In December, we published updated guidance on our approach to merger remedies.
We are now launching a review into our approach to the assessment of rivalry-enhancing efficiencies in mergers, as part of our ongoing commitment to support growth, investment, and business confidence across the UK economy.
We are seeking your views and evidence on the CMA’s:
- analytical approach to rivalry-enhancing efficiencies, including the types of evidence we consider and how we assess dynamic efficiencies
- process for assessing rivalry-enhancing efficiencies, including how we engage with merging parties on efficiency claims
Documents
Call for evidence
PDF, 176 KB, 11 pages
AlixPartners
PDF, 251 KB, 11 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Balanced Economy Project
PDF, 247 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
BRG
PDF, 206 KB, 6 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Centre for Competition Policy
PDF, 144 KB, 17 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
City of London Law Society
PDF, 357 KB, 11 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Clifford Chance LLP
PDF, 234 KB, 9 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Compass Lexecon
PDF, 269 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Econic Partners
PDF, 435 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys at Law
PDF, 429 KB, 9 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Freshfields LLP
PDF, 354 KB, 22 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Friday Initiatives
PDF, 111 KB, 4 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Frontier Economics
PDF, 525 KB, 22 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
PDF, 179 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
International Center for Law & Economics
PDF, 292 KB, 13 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Linklaters LLP
PDF, 349 KB, 8 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Paul Weiss
PDF, 426 KB, 14 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PDF, 394 KB, 14 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Professor Carmine Ornaghi
PDF, 187 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
RBB Economics
PDF, 343 KB, 9 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
The Computer & Communications Industry Association
PDF, 321 KB, 6 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
UK Finance
PDF, 275 KB, 5 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
UK Private Capital
PDF, 269 KB, 7 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
VodafoneThree
PDF, 125 KB, 3 pages
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
Share this page
The following links open in a new tab