Financial services – prohibition order – s 56 FSMA – matter remitted to
Tribunal by Court of Appeal to address the question whether, even if
applicant was not guilty of market abuse, his lying, which in earlier
proceedings the Tribunal had found as a fact, demonstrated that he was not
a fit and proper person – whether a prohibition order was appropriate in
circumstances where applicant had not worked in financial services for a
considerable period and gave evidence that he did not intend to do so.