ESM2057 - Agency and temporary workers: agency legislation - provisions from 6 April 2014: supervision, direction or control example - IT consultant
Part 2, Chapter 7 Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003, Part 2, Chapter 7, section 44(2)(a)
Social Security (Categorisation of Earners) Regulations 1978, Schedule 1, Part 1, paragraph 2
IT consultant
Paul is a skilled IT Consultant who specialises in designing, building, and implementing websites for businesses. He obtains his work via an employment business which finds him jobs with clients. A retail clothing company ask the employment business to provide an IT specialist for a two week engagement, to do some internet-based IT work. The employment business contact Paul and as he wishes to take the engagement, arrangements are made for Paul to attend an interview with the client.
Scenario 1
Paul attends the interview where he meets the company directors who tell Paul they want him to design, build, and place onto the internet a new website for their business which will advertise and sell their products online. Discussions are held during which time Paul shows the directors his portfolio and websites he has previously created. The directors are impressed and Paul is offered the engagement, which he accepts. The Directors then tell Paul he has a completely free role to design and build the website as he sees fit, without anyone being able to intervene to instruct Paul what the website must look like or how it must be created. The only specific requirement placed on Paul is that the new website is completed, placed online, and activated before his engagement ends.
At his own choice, Paul works alone and decides to do some of the design work at home and some at the company’s premises, where he is provided with a desk and PC, but completely left alone to get on with and complete his work. Although the company have not asked for weekly progress reports, out of courtesy Paul decides to provide them (as this is how he normally works for his customers). Paul works alone throughout his engagement without any intervention whatsoever from the client, and finishes designing the website on the eleventh day. Paul then places the website online on day twelve and tells the client he will be monitoring the website’s performance for the remaining two days of his engagement, to make sure it functions correctly. The website works correctly and on day fourteen Paul’s engagement ends.
In this scenario, from the very outset Paul has been told he would be given complete freedom to decide and control how he would provide his services, without anyone being able to intervene to dictate what Paul had to do and how he must do it - and this is what happened in practice. Paul has not been subjected to (or to a right of) any supervision, direction, or control as to the manner in which he provided his services during his arrangement. The agency legislation does not apply to this scenario.
Scenario 2
The employment business tells Paul his engagement with the client will be for six days (Monday to Saturday). The client tells Paul that they require an IT specialist for the six days to assist their IT Team which will be arranged and overseen by Jacqueline, the company’s IT Manager. Paul is told Jacqueline will be deciding what jobs Paul will do, telling Paul how they must be done, and throughout she will be supervising Paul and instructing him as to the order in which the jobs should be done, which may change at short notice. Paul is informed that throughout, Jacqueline will be managing him and the other IT workers to make sure their assigned work are done to the required specification.
In this scenario, the Company have made it clear to Paul that the IT Manager (Jacqueline) would have a right to give Paul directions and supervision as to how he must do his work. In addition, Jacqueline would have the right to control the manner in which Paul did his work by dictating the order in which tasks must be done, how he does the work and they have the right to move him from task to task. From the very outset of this arrangement, Paul has been subject to a right of supervision, direction, or control as to the manner in which he did his work. If that “right” had not been implemented in practice the existence of that right of supervision, direction, or control as to the manner in which Paul provided his services is sufficient for the agency legislation to apply to this scenario, provided the other conditions of the legislation are also met.