Malpractice in GCSE, AS and A level: summer 2023 exam series
Updated 19 November 2024
Applies to England
Introduction
This release presents figures on reported cases of malpractice for which a penalty was issued associated with GCSE, AS and A level qualifications in England for the summer 2023 exam series, and historical data going back to 2018. These figures are correct at the time of publication, however, some investigations into cases of malpractice may still be ongoing.
A single malpractice case may involve an individual student, member of school or college staff, or school or college, but may also involve multiple individuals from either within or across these groups. It is possible for cases of staff or school or college level malpractice to include both GCSE and AS and A level qualifications.
The exceptional assessment arrangements put in place in 2020 and 2021 resulted in very low numbers of malpractice cases being reported in those 2 years. This was because many of the more common instances of malpractice, such as taking unauthorised material into an examination, were not relevant. The different methods of assessment used in 2020 and 2021 also mean that numbers of malpractice cases in these years are not comparable to years when exams are sat. For this reason, although we report the number of malpractice cases in 2020 and 2021, no further breakdowns by types of penalty or offence have been presented for these years. This information is available in the data tables accompanying this report.
Changes in cohort size may also affect the overall number of malpractice cases in each academic year. In the summer 2023 exam series there was a 1.2% increase in the total number of GCSE, AS and A level entries compared to the previous year. GCSE, AS and A level entries increased from 16.7 million in the summer 2022 exam series to 16.9 million in the 2023 summer exam series.
Further information, including definitions and examples of the different categories of malpractice presented within this publication, is available in the Suspected Malpractice Policies and Procedures document published by the Joint Council for Qualifications.
Key headlines
The key headlines for cases of malpractice for which a penalty was issued (proven cases of malpractice), in GCSE, AS and A level qualifications for the summer 2023 exam series were:
-
The number of proven cases of malpractice involving students has increased compared to the previous year. There were 4,895 cases of malpractice involving students in 2023, up from 4,105 in 2022, from almost 17 million GCSE, AS and A level entries (at component level) in both years.
-
For student malpractice, 44.5% of all cases involved mobile phone and other communication device offences. There were 2,180 cases with penalties for this type of offence in 2023, compared with 1,825 (44.5%) in 2022.
-
The number of cases of malpractice involving school or college staff decreased compared to the previous year. 220 cases of malpractice included members of staff in 2023, down from 240 in 2022. Only a small proportion of the total number of staff in England (over 360,000 full time equivalent teachers and support staff in state funded secondary schools) were involved in malpractice cases.
-
There were 50 cases of school or college level malpractice in 2023, down from 55 in 2022.
Student malpractice
Exam boards may impose sanctions and penalties on students found to have committed malpractice. The penalties for student malpractice vary depending on the type of offence. An individual student can potentially be involved in multiple cases of malpractice and be penalised by more than one exam board if they commit malpractice offences when sitting more than one assessment. A student may also receive one penalty for multiple offences.
Exam series | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Cases of student malpractice | 2,635 | 2,950 | 20 | 260 | 4,105 | 4,895 |
In 2023, 4,895 cases of malpractice included students, up from 4,105 in 2022, from almost 17 million GCSE, AS and A level entries (at component level).
In 2023, 4,665 individual students were involved in malpractice cases, compared to 3,985 individual students in 2022.
Types of student malpractice (proportion of cases per offence type)
Type of student malpractice | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Disruptive behaviour | 7.0% | 4.0% | 5.0% | 6.0% |
Inappropriate materials | 8.0% | 15.0% | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Mobile phones | 48.0% | 47.0% | 43.0% | 43.0% |
Other reasons | 18.0% | 19.0% | 18.0% | 22.0% |
Other unauthorised materials | 16.0% | 13.0% | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Plagiarism | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Multiple malpractice types | 1.0% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 3.0% |
The most common type of malpractice reported in 2023 was the introduction of a mobile phone or other communications device into the examination room, the same as in 2022. This category appeared in 44.5% of all cases of student malpractice (2,180 cases in 2023, compared with 1,825 cases (44.5%) in 2022). These figures include cases where multiple offence types took place and therefore differ from the values reported in the previous table (43.1% and 43.4%), where cases involving multiple malpractice types are categorised separately.
Note: The ‘mobile phones’ category also includes other communication devices such as smartwatches. ‘Inappropriate materials’ refers to the inclusion of inappropriate, offensive or obscene materials in scripts, coursework or portfolios. The ‘other unauthorised materials’ category includes non-smart watches, which were prohibited from being brought into the examination room from September 2021.
‘Other reasons’ include being in possession of confidential material in advance of the examination, copying from another candidate, misuse of or attempted misuse of examination material and resources, as well as other offences.
Types of penalty issued to students (number of cases per penalty type)
Penalty type | Number of cases in 2018 | Number of cases in 2019 | Number of cases in 2022 | Number of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Loss of aggregation or certification opportunity | 395 | 585 | 735 | 1,020 |
Loss of marks | 1,405 | 1,535 | 2,005 | 2,215 |
Warning | 865 | 845 | 1,390 | 1,680 |
Total | 2,665 | 2,960 | 4,130 | 4,920 |
The most common type of penalty issued in 2023 was a loss of marks, with the number of cases resulting in this type of penalty being issued increasing to 2,215 from 2,005 in 2022.
Note: As an individual malpractice case may result in multiple different types of penalties these totals may exceed the total number of distinct malpractice cases.
Number of malpractice cases per student
Individual students can be involved in multiple malpractice cases. In 2023, nearly all students who were involved in malpractice (94.3%) were involved in only one case, similar to 2022 (95.2%). There was a small number of students who were involved in more than one case of malpractice.
Number of cases | Percent of students in 2018 | Percent of students in 2019 | Percent of students in 2022 | Percent of students in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
One case | 95.4% | 93.8% | 95.2% | 94.3% |
Two cases | 3.8% | 5.3% | 3.7% | 4.7% |
Three or more cases | 0.7% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.1% |
Number of students per malpractice case
Similarly, a single malpractice case can involve multiple students. In 2023, nearly all cases of student malpractice (98.5%) involved only one student, similar to 2022 (98.0%). There were a small number of cases which involved more than one student.
Number of students | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
One student | 98.3% | 98.4% | 98.0% | 98.5% |
Two students | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.0% |
Three or more students | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
Types of penalty issued to students, by type of malpractice
Note: Penalties for cases of student malpractice vary depending on the type of offence. The categories presented here are broad, and could cover a range of specific sanctions and transgressions. The precise penalty applied depends on the circumstances of the specific case.
The ‘multiple types of penalty’ category represents cases which resulted in more than one penalty type being applied. Should a type of penalty only occur in cases that resulted in multiple different types of penalties being applied, that type will be counted in the ‘multiple types of penalty’ category rather than individually listed in the tables and charts presented in the report. A full breakdown of penalty types, including those aggregated into the ‘multiple penalty’ category, is available in the data tables accompanying this release.
Mobile phones
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
Loss of aggregation or certification opportunity | 9.6% | 15.6% | 13.6% | 17.4% |
Loss of marks | 69.5% | 63.0% | 67.4% | 65.6% |
Warning | 20.5% | 21.3% | 18.8% | 16.8% |
Inappropriate materials
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Loss of aggregation or certification opportunity | 5.3% | 8.0% | 13.3% | 14.5% |
Loss of marks | 32.4% | 43.7% | 36.0% | 13.0% |
Warning | 61.8% | 48.3% | 50.7% | 72.5% |
Other unauthorised materials
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
Loss of aggregation or certification opportunity | 17.9% | 24.1% | 17.6% | 17.4% |
Loss of marks | 53.0% | 51.1% | 34.8% | 37.9% |
Warning | 28.4% | 24.9% | 47.2% | 44.5% |
Disruptive behaviour
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
Loss of aggregation or certification opportunity | 9.6% | 16.0% | 29.1% | 25.2% |
Loss of marks | 42.0% | 52.9% | 38.6% | 40.0% |
Warning | 48.4% | 29.4% | 31.5% | 34.0% |
Plagiarism
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.1% |
Loss of aggregation or certification opportunity | 14.6% | 14.5% | 7.0% | 19.6% |
Loss of marks | 54.2% | 68.1% | 59.3% | 48.9% |
Warning | 31.2% | 17.4% | 32.6% | 30.4% |
Other reasons
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.4% |
Loss of aggregation or certification opportunity | 31.4% | 37.0% | 31.8% | 32.2% |
Loss of marks | 20.0% | 28.4% | 24.8% | 25.4% |
Warning | 47.3% | 33.4% | 42.1% | 42.0% |
Staff malpractice
Exam boards may impose penalties for malpractice committed by an individual member of staff at a school or college, for example a teacher or an invigilator. An individual member of staff can potentially be involved in multiple cases of malpractice, and a single malpractice case may involve more than one staff member.
Exam series | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Cases of staff malpractice | 380 | 330 | 20 | 30 | 240 | 220 |
In 2023, 220 cases of malpractice involved members of staff, down from 240 in 2022.
In 2023, 300 individual members of staff were involved in malpractice cases, compared with 285 individual members of staff in 2022. Only a small proportion of the total number of staff in England (over 360,000 full time equivalent teachers and support staff in state funded secondary schools) were involved in malpractice cases.
Types of staff malpractice (proportion of cases per offence type)
Type of staff malpractice | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Breach of security | 19.1% | 15.9% | 9.5% | 10.4% |
Deception | 0.8% | 0.9% | 2.1% | 1.4% |
Failure to comply with regulations | 2.9% | 1.5% | 2.5% | 0.5% |
Improper assistance to candidates | 25.1% | 20.7% | 28.1% | 20.8% |
Maladministration | 49.2% | 57.3% | 50.0% | 57.5% |
Failure to co-operate with an investigation | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Multiple malpractice types | 2.9% | 2.7% | 7.9% | 9.5% |
The most common type of staff malpractice for which a penalty was applied in 2023 was maladministration (the failure to adhere to the regulations of examinations and non-examination assessments), the same as in 2022. This category appeared in 66.5% of all cases of staff malpractice (145 cases in 2023, compared with 135 in 2022), including cases where multiple offence types took place.
Note: ‘Failure to comply with regulations’ refers to a failure to comply with regulations for access arrangements, reasonable adjustments, and/or special consideration.
Types of penalty issued to staff (number of cases per penalty type)
Penalty type | Number of cases in 2018 | Number of cases in 2019 | Number of cases in 2022 | Number of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Special conditions | 70 | 50 | 55 | 15 |
Suspension | 45 | 30 | 40 | 15 |
Training | 110 | 40 | 30 | 50 |
Written warning | 275 | 245 | 170 | 180 |
Referral to TRA (Teaching Regulation Agency) | 0 | 0 | Fewer than 5 | Fewer than 5 |
Total | 505 | 365 | 300 | 260 |
The most common type of penalty issued to staff in 2023 was a written warning, with the number of cases resulting in this type of penalty being issued increasing to 180 from 170 in 2022.
Note: As an individual malpractice case may result in multiple different types of penalties these totals may exceed the total number of distinct malpractice cases.
Number of malpractice cases per member of staff
Individual members of school and college staff can be involved in multiple malpractice cases. In 2023, all staff members involved in malpractice (100%) were involved in only one case, the same as in 2022.
Number of cases | Percent of staff members in 2018 | Percent of staff members in 2019 | Percent of staff members in 2022 | Percent of staff members in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
One case | 97.8% | 99.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Two cases | 2.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Three or more cases | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Number of members of staff per malpractice case
Similarly, a single malpractice case can involve multiple staff members. In 2023, the majority of cases of staff malpractice (74.7%) involved only one staff member, down from 86.0% in 2022.
Number of staff members | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
One member of staff | 73.3% | 80.2% | 86.0% | 74.7% |
Two members of staff | 20.2% | 15.5% | 12.0% | 19.5% |
Three or more members of staff | 6.5% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 5.9% |
Types of penalty issued to members of centre staff, by type of malpractice
Note: The ‘multiple types of penalty’ category represents cases which resulted in more than one penalty type being applied. Should a type of penalty only occur in cases that resulted in multiple different types of penalties being applied, that type will be counted in the ‘multiple types of penalty’ category rather than individually listed in the tables and charts presented in the report. A full breakdown of penalty types, including those aggregated into the ‘multiple penalty’ category, is available in the data tables accompanying this release.
Maladministration
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 11.1% | 4.1% | 9.6% | 13.6% |
Special conditions | 3.0% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 0.0% |
Suspension | 3.0% | 2.6% | 1.5% | 0.0% |
Training | 6.6% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 12.9% |
Written warning | 76.3% | 86.6% | 81.5% | 73.5% |
Improper assistance to candidates
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 49.5% | 20.5% | 44.3% | 30.5% |
Special conditions | 3.0% | 26.0% | 7.6% | 0.0% |
Suspension | 8.9% | 13.7% | 7.6% | 1.7% |
Training | 6.9% | 9.6% | 7.6% | 10.2% |
Written warning | 31.7% | 30.1% | 32.9% | 57.6% |
Breach of security
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 32.5% | 15.5% | 31.2% | 15.6% |
Special conditions | 2.5% | 15.5% | 3.1% | 0.0% |
Suspension | 5.0% | 12.1% | 3.1% | 0.0% |
Training | 2.5% | 3.4% | 0.0% | 6.2% |
Written warning | 57.5% | 53.4% | 62.5% | 78.1% |
Deception
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 33.3% | 50.0% | 37.5% | 20.0% |
Special conditions | 0.0% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Suspension | 66.7% | 0.0% | 62.5% | 0.0% |
Training | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 20.0% |
Written warning | 0.0% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 60.0% |
Failure to comply with regulations
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 36.4% | 0.0% | 25.0% | 0.0% |
Suspension | 0.0% | 0.0% | 12.5% | 0.0% |
Training | 0.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Written warning | 63.6% | 80.0% | 62.5% | 100.0% |
Failure to co-operate with an investigation
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Suspension | 0.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
Written warning | 100.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
School or college malpractice
Where there is evidence that malpractice is the result of a serious management failure, an exam board may apply sanctions against a whole department or a school or college.
Exam series | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
Cases of school or college level malpractice | 135 | 120 | 15 | 5 | 55 | 50 |
There were 50 cases of school or college level malpractice in 2023, down from 55 in 2022.
Types of school or college level malpractice (proportion of cases per offence type)
Type of school or college malpractice | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Breach of security | 17.6% | 23.0% | 37.0% | 25.0% |
Failure to comply with regulations | 4.4% | 3.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Improper assistance to candidates | 2.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 3.8% |
Maladministration | 75.0% | 71.3% | 55.6% | 65.4% |
Failure to co-operate with an investigation | 0.0% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 0.0% |
Multiple malpractice types | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.6% | 5.8% |
The most common type of school or college level malpractice in 2023 was maladministration (the failure to adhere to the regulations of examinations and non-examination assessments, the same as in 2022. This category appeared in (35 (71.2%) of all cases of school or college level malpractice in 2023), compared with (35 (61.1%) of all cases of school or college level malpractice in 2022), including cases where multiple offence types took place.
Types of penalty issued to schools or colleges (number of cases per penalty type)
Penalty type | Number of cases in 2018 | Number of cases in 2019 | Number of cases in 2022 | Number of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Additional monitoring or inspection | 10 | 5 | 0 | Fewer than 5 |
Review and report | 35 | 60 | 30 | 35 |
Withdrawal of centre recognition | Fewer than 5 | 5 | Fewer than 5 | 0 |
Written warning | 105 | 65 | 30 | 25 |
Withdrawal of approval for a specific qualification | 0 | Fewer than 5 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 150 | 135 | 55 | 60 |
The most common type of penalty issued to schools and colleges in 2023 was a review and report, with the number of cases resulting in this type of penalty being issued increasing to 35 from 30 in 2022.
Number of malpractice cases per school or college
Individual schools or colleges can be involved in multiple malpractice cases. In 2023, all schools or colleges involved in school or college level malpractice (100%) were involved in only one case, the same as in 2022 (100%).
Number of cases | Percent of schools or colleges in 2018 | Percent of schools or colleges in 2019 | Percent of schools or colleges in 2022 | Percent of schools or colleges in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
One case | 97.8% | 99.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Two cases | 2.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Three or more cases | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Types of penalty issued to schools and colleges, by type of malpractice
Note: where a year is not shown in these graphs, this indicates that there were no cases of malpractice where a penalty was issued for the specific offence in that year.
The ‘multiple types of penalty’ category represents cases which resulted in more than one penalty type being applied. Should a type of penalty only occur in cases that resulted in multiple different types of penalties being applied, that type will be counted in the ‘multiple types of penalty’ category rather than individually listed in the tables and charts presented in the report. A full breakdown of penalty types, including those aggregated into the ‘multiple penalty’ category, is available in the data tables accompanying this release.
Maladministration
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 5.9% | 10.3% | 6.1% | 10.8% |
Additional monitoring or inspection | 3.9% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Review and report | 14.7% | 41.4% | 66.7% | 56.8% |
Withdrawal of approval for a specific qualification | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Withdrawal of centre recognition | 1.0% | 3.4% | 3.0% | 0.0% |
Written warning | 74.5% | 42.5% | 24.2% | 32.4% |
Breach of security
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 20.8% | 14.3% | 8.7% | 33.3% |
Additional monitoring or inspection | 12.5% | 7.1% | 0.0% | 6.7% |
Review and report | 25.0% | 28.6% | 13.0% | 33.3% |
Withdrawal of centre recognition | 0.0% | 10.7% | 4.3% | 0.0% |
Written warning | 41.7% | 39.3% | 73.9% | 26.7% |
Failure to comply with regulations
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
Multiple types of penalty | 16.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Additional monitoring or inspection | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Review and report | 33.3% | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Written warning | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
Failure to co-operate with an investigation
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2022 |
---|---|---|
Review and report | 50.0% | 0.0% |
Withdrawal of centre recognition | 50.0% | 0.0% |
Written warning | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Improper assistance to candidates
Penalty type | Percent of cases in 2018 | Percent of cases in 2019 | Percent of cases in 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
Review and report | 50.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% |
Written warning | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
Contextual information
In this statistical release, Ofqual presents data on malpractice in GCSE, AS, and A level assessments during the summer 2023 exam series in England. The data may not reflect the full extent of malpractice because these cases relate only to instances of reported malpractice where a penalty has been applied.
Exams were cancelled in 2020 and 2021 following the closure of schools and colleges to most students, as part of the response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. This will have affected the number of cases and types of malpractice.
Any breach of the exam boards’ regulations that might undermine the integrity of an assessment may constitute malpractice. This includes bringing into the exam room unauthorised material or mobile phones, and failures by school or college staff to comply with exam board instructions.
Ofqual requires exam boards to have procedures in place to prevent, investigate and act in relation to malpractice by students, school or college staff or others involved in the assessment of qualifications. The Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) publishes policies and guidance on malpractice that set out procedures for dealing with suspected malpractice as well as definitions for the categories of malpractice listed within this release.
In this release, all figures are rounded to the nearest 5 to ensure confidentiality of data. Further information on this release is available in the background information and data tables accompanying this report.
User feedback
We welcome your feedback on our publications. Should you have any comments on this statistical release and how to improve it to meet your needs please contact us at data.analytics@ofqual.gov.uk.