This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
Details
This is a selection of four case studies of providers who involve, listen carefully to and work effectively with their learners to improve teaching, learning and assessment. The case studies cover providers in 4 areas of the further education and skills sector: a general further education college, an independent learning provider, a prison and a sixth form college.
Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector’s Annual Report for further education and skills in 2012/13 identified that ‘where procedures were ineffective at improving teaching, the systems for monitoring the quality of teaching frequently failed to identify where and why teaching was not effectively supporting all the learners… all too often, these weaker providers either failed to listen to their learners or took too much notice of positive satisfaction surveys without checking whether their questions were analytical enough’.
Inspectors found 4 providers’ use of learners’ views to be instrumental in ensuring that the standard of teaching, learning and assessment was of outstanding or good quality. The term ‘learner’ refers to all people enrolled on publicly-funded learning and skills provision, including apprentices, prisoners and adults on workplace learning.