Research and analysis

Exam and assessment marking research

Research papers by Ofqual, QCA and NAA into marking of exams and assessments.

Published 22 December 2000
Last updated 27 July 2017 — see all updates
From:
Ofqual
Applies to:
Wales, England, and Northern Ireland

Documents

The Effect of Sample Size on Increased Precision in Detecting Errant Marking (Al-Bayatti & Jones, 2005)

PDF, 76.5KB, 10 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

An evaluation of external marking review services during 2000 (Newton & Whetton, 2000)

PDF, 16.7MB, 238 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Evaluation of Reviews of Marking and Moderation 2016: study and survey (Howard & Black, 2017)

Ref: Ofqual/17/6253 PDF, 3.31MB, 102 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

An exploratory investigation into how moderators of non-examined assessments make their judgements (Cuff, 2017)

Ref: Ofqual/17/6252 PDF, 647KB, 44 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Final Report for Research on Marker Selection (Meadows & Billington, 2007)

PDF, 325KB, 60 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

An Investigation of Targeted Double Marking for GCSE and GCE (Fearnley, 2005)

PDF, 205KB, 28 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Is teaching experience necessary for key stage 3 English markers? (Royal-Dawson, 2005)

PDF, 357KB, 68 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Marking Reliability of the Key Stage 2 National Curriculum English Writing Tests in England (Ofqual, 2014)

Ref: Ofqual/14/5377 PDF, 616KB, 33 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

On your marks: A review of awarding bodies' capacity to mark GCSE, A level, principal learning and project examinations in summer 2009 (Ofqual, 2009)

Ref: Ofqual/09/4265 PDF, 40.8KB, 10 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Research into alternative marking review processes for exams (Ofqual, 2015)

Ref: Ofqual/15/5804 PDF, 1.2MB, 58 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Research into marking quality: Studies to inform future work on national curriculum assessments (QCA, 2009)

Ref: QCA/09/4042 PDF, 113KB, 20 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

A review of the literature on marking reliability (Meadows & Billington, 2005)

PDF, 442KB, 89 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Reviews of marking and moderation resulting in grade changes of 2 grades or more Summer 2016 examination series (Ofqual, 2017)

Ref: Ofqual/17/6254 PDF, 594KB, 24 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Reviews of marking and moderation: subject level analyses: Summer 2016 exam series (Ofqual, 2017)

Ref: Ofqual/17/6255 PDF, 1.02MB, 39 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

Research into marking.

Published 22 December 2000
Last updated 27 July 2017 + show all updates

  1. Added 4 reports: 'Reviews of marking and moderation resulting in grade changes of 2 grades or more: Summer 2016 examination series', 'An exploratory investigation into how moderators of non-examined assessments make their judgements', 'Evaluation of Reviews of Marking and Moderation 2016: Study and survey' and 'Reviews of marking and moderation: subject level analyses: Summer 2016 exam series'.

  2. First published.