Quarterly data summaries published
This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government
Quarterly snapshot on how each department is spending its budget, the results it has achieved and how it is deploying its workforce.
The Quarterly Data Summaries (QDS) are designed to fit on a single page to provide a quarterly snapshot on how each department is spending its budget, the results it has achieved and how it is deploying its workforce.
The summaries follow commitments made in the 2011 Budget and the Written Ministerial Statement on Business Plans. Their primary purpose is to make more of the management information currently held by government available to members of the public on a regular basis.
This information is not audited and the quality and accuracy of the data needs to dramatically improve. However, over time with improvements in data quality and timeliness the public will be able to judge the performance of each department in a meaningful and understandable manner.
Departments’ outturn data for 2011/12, against each of the QDS indicators will be included in their Annual Report and Accounts.
The information is presented in excel format to allow the information to be presented in a re-usable format.
- Cabinet Office
- Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
- Department for Communities and Local Government
- Department for Culture, Media and Sport
- Department for Education
- Department of Energy and Climate Change
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
- Department for Health
- Department for International Development
- Department for Transport
- Department for Work and Pensions
- Foreign and Commonwealth Office
- HM Revenue & Customs
- HM Treasury
- Home Office
- Ministry of Defence
- Ministry of Justice
The summary template is the same for all departments, though many of the individual indicators are unique to the department (especially input and impact indicators).
Before using this data people should ensure they take full note of the caveats noted in each Department’s measurement annex and treat with necessary caution.
At the moment, people should not be using this data to make direct comparisons between departments for several reasons. Firstly, the business of each department is unique and it does not make sense to compare some measures across all departments. Secondly, many of the measures are not directly comparable because they do not have common definitions, time periods, or data collection processes.
We will be regularly updating the QDS each quarter.
Published: 13 July 2012