As part of the UK Government’s Prosperity Fund, the British Embassy in Brazil is commissioning a study to assess various options for the governance structure of an Energy Centre to inform and support the Prosperity Fund Energy Programme. The proposal should identify operating models, outlining the functions and processes that will be undertaken, and recommendations on an effective governance structure, encompassing a Strategic advisory board and its Sub committees.
Brazil’s economic growth is reliant on meeting its growing energy demand by 2030. Total energy demand is expected to increase 60%requiring an estimated cumulative investment of £365bn by 2030. However, regulatory and technological barriers and a challenging business environment can prevent Brazil from achieving its energy goals.
The British Embassy is developing a programme to support and accelerate Brazil’s low carbon energy transition. The programme considers the importance of greater coordination between regulatory and technical solutions to address the key challenges to faster transition to low carbon energy. The programme contemplates the creation on an Energy Centre which will identify the synergies between regulatory and technological barriers and develop a clear and co-ordinated pathway for addressing them, creating opportunities in the energy market in the process. The programme will work to develop evidenced based policy and regulatory recommendations and advocacy for change and pilot innovative technologies in the following priority areas:
- Developing a competitive gas market
- Improving the environmental licencing process
- Supporting a competitive supply chain
- Bio fuels/Bio gas from waste
Green Energy Technology
- Interconnectivity challenges of Integrating renewable energy into the main grid
- Production of bio diesel and bio gas from waste
- Smart Grids
- Energy storage
The British Embassy in Brazil is seeking for an energy specialist to undertake research to assess and propose an effective governance structure, encompassing a Strategic advisory board and its sub-committees for an energy centre in Brazil. The report should include operating models outlining the functions and processes that will be undertaken by the centre that could also support officials from Brazilian government working alongside programme staff, embedded within the team or vice versa.
The work should result in the delivery of the organigram and governance of (i) Strategic Advisory Board and (ii) Sub-committees and (iii) operating models and recommendations.
The Strategic Advisory Board should consider stakeholders in key positions in the energy market in Brazil, such as Ministerio de Minas e Energia (MME), Ministry of Science and Technology (MCTIC) Empresa de Planejamento Energetico (EPE), Agencia Nacional do Petroleo (ANP), IBAMA, ANEEL, relevant civil society organisations and energy companies. The purpose of the Strategic Advisory Board will be to provide a strategic steer for the Energy Centre, ensuring alignment with Brazilian Government priorities and advise on main work streams. It is envisaged that the Advisory Board will meet once a year.
The Sub-committees’ role will be to formulate ideas and plans to support implementation of the Energy programme, taking account of the Strategic Advisory Board’s recommendations and ensuring co-ordination with other relevant energy programmes and alignment to the Government’s energy priorities avoiding duplication of work. The Sub-committee structure should include key stakeholders in the energy sector including other actors with energy programmes in Brazil. It is envisaged that the subcommittee will meet twice a year.
Both structures, Strategic Advisory Board and Sub-committees should work in co-ordination. The organigrams should mention seniority and roles and not individual names. No contacts should be approached in relation to this work.
It is recommended that the report also assesses the governing structure if energy centres around the world and in Brazil against which the recommendations can be evidenced and benchmarked.
The products to be delivered are:
- Full Report in English (digital and physical)
- Executive summary in both languages, English and Portuguese, digital and physical
- Management presentation to be held at British Embassy or British Consulate
All the surveys and studies should be supported with evidence and sources of research. It should be consider the most recent information available and make explicit and justify its premises.
All the surveys and studies should be supported with evidences and sources of research. It should be considered the most recent information available and its premises.
The awarded Contractor will report to the Energy Programme Manager.
The Contractor will be responsible for all the research, including data collection, processing, analysing and reporting. In case of receiving information from the British Embassy, the awarded Contractor must agree with the confidentiality of the information as requested.
The contractor should agree to hold an introductory meeting, a final meeting (Management presentation) and monthly meetings to share progress, and agree decisions pertinent to the success of the deliverables of the project.
The British Embassy can request possible adjustments in the products (reports) to be delivered and agreed by both parties. The objective is to ensure clarity and a clear understanding of the expectations of both parties.
The Contractor is responsible to deliver the products mentioned in item 3 in compliance with the Timeline and Payment method described in item 5.
The study should be carried out during the period of September 2018 to February 2019. The details about initial, final and monthly meetings dates are displayed the table below.
Payment will be by result and against delivery. The first payment will be executed face to the second meeting (First week of Nov 2018) and draft report review, considering 30% of the total amount of the proposal. The second payment, considering 70% of the total amount will be done after final meeting face to the presentation of the products agreed on item 3 and possible adjustments required. All payments will only be processed once deliverables have been received and fully approved by the Energy Team at the British Embassy.
|Proposal open to application
||Jun 25th 2018
||Jul 25th 2018
||Aug 10th 2018
||Aug 20th 2018
||First week of Sep 2018
||First week of Oct 2018
|Second meeting and draft report review
||First week of Nov 2018
||First payment (30%)
|Third meeting and draft report review
||First week of Dec 2018
|Full Report and Executive Summary delivery
||Jan 14th 2019
|Final meeting - Management presentation
||Jan 24th 2019
|Possible adjustments after presentation and reports submission
||First week of February 2019
||Second payment (70%)
The proposal should range between £20,000 and £24,900. Any proposals outside this range will not be considered.
A Selection Board will assess all proposals received and select the award Contractor. The Board will be composed of at least three Embassy personnel from three different teams. . The awarded contractor will be notified by August 20th. Proposals not selected will receive an automatic response.
6. Sending the proposals
The proposals must include:
* All elements which will be considered for tender evaluation (more information in Evaluation criteria doc), such as names and curriculum of the technical team of consultant (s) who will undertake the study and suggested methodology and sources to be applied in the research;
* Financial proposal of the study considering all charges and fees, in the range presented in item 5 (more information in Schedule of Prices and rates doc).
The parties interested to apply for this work should submit their proposals to Erika.Gouveia@fco.gov.uk by 12:00pm July 25th 2018. For any queries during the application time, please forward an email to Flavia Lima (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Evaluation Criteria: Governance Assessment for an Energy Centre in Brasil
The tender process will be conducted to ensure that the tenders are evaluated fairly to ascertain the most economically advantageous tender from the point of view of the purchasing Authority.
Account will be taken of any factor emerging from the tendering process which impacts a Bidder’s suitability and relates to information previously provided by the Bidder as part of the pre-qualification process, in particular any additional information which comes to light in respect of its financial standing.
Your response to our requirement will be evaluated under the following headings based on an 70/30 split between the quality/technical aspects and pricing/commercial aspects. Responses to all of the questions below should be submitted with your proposal to email@example.com.
Once bids have been evaluated, the Authority may invite bidders to clarification meetings to clarify aspects of their bids. In the event that the Authority exercises this right, all qualified bidders will be invited to present their clarifications. This may result in upward or downward moderation of the scores. Areas for clarification will be issued to each bidder accordingly by email along with meeting details.
No importance should be attached to the order in which these criteria are listed. Any tender that is not compliant with the Conditions of Contract may be rejected.
Bidders are requested to ensure their answers are concise and relevant to this specific contract, and refrain from uploading extensive generic corporate documentation or marketing literature. Excessive generic material may result in the bid being deemed unacceptable and excluded from the process.
The Authority will evaluate each response in line with the published scoring methodology and reserves the right detailed further.
The Authority wishes to advise all bidders that there is a limited budget for this work. All proposals will be assessed from both technical and commercial perspectives to ensure that best value for Tax Payer’s money is being achieved.
|1. Evaluation Criteria – Quality/Technical
|1.1 Understanding of the brief and knowledge of subject matter Demonstration a thorough understanding of the requirement and evidence your knowledge in the subject matter within the context of energy market in Brazil.
||0 – 5 score
|1.2 Methodology Having reviewed the terms of reference and tender documents in detail, the proposal must consider the details of the methodology and sources to deliver the outputs and results expected according to the timeline proposed.
||0 – 5 score
|1.3 Experience * Similar programmes the bidder have been involved in setting up and running in the past. * Detail existing links with relevant energy stakeholders and previous programmes and collaboration with them that would be relevant to this project.
||0 – 5 score
|1.4 Project Team * Outline the members of your proposed project team and Experts Group, and provide their CVs for further reading. Detail their expertise and experience, and their roles, responsibilities and level of participation in the project. * Demonstrate that the Experts and project team members possess a sufficient range of skills, expertise and experience to successfully achieve the aims of the project.
||0 – 5 score
|1.5 Gender Inclusion Demonstration of gender inclusion in the project team and roles.
||0 – 5 score
|TOTAL – Quality/Technical
||Max Score 500
|2. Evaluation Criteria – Pricing & Commercial
|2.1 - Competitiveness of fee rates and overall project cost in relation to the market to demonstrate value for money.
||0 – 5 score
|TOTAL – Pricing & Commercial
||Max Score 150
|GRAND TOTAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
||Max Score 550
All tenders will be scored as above in accordance with the marking system set out below:
|Score Key Assessment
||Satisfies the requirement and demonstrates exceptional understanding and evidence in their ability/proposed methodology to deliver a solution for the required supplies/services. Response identifies factors that will offer potential added value, with evidence to support the response. Bidder has fully accepted FCO standard terms and conditions of contact.
||Satisfies the requirement with minor additional benefits. Above average demonstration by the Bidder of the understanding and evidence in their ability/proposed methodology to deliver a solution for the required supplies/services. Response identifies factors that will offer potential added value, with evidence to support the response.
||Satisfies the requirement. Demonstration by the Bidder of the understanding and evidence in their ability/proposed methodology to deliver a solution for the required supplies/services.
||Satisfies the requirement with minor reservations. Some minor reservations of the Bidder’s understanding and proposed methodology, with limited evidence to support the response. Bidder has accepted FCO standard terms and conditions of contract.
||Satisfies the requirement with major reservations. Major reservations of the Bidder’s understanding and proposed methodology, with little or no evidence to support the response.
|Unacceptable - Non compliant
||Does not meet the requirement. Does not comply and/or insufficient information provided to demonstrate that the Bidder has the understanding or suitable methodology, with little or no evidence to support the response. Bidder has rejected FCO standard terms and conditions of contract.
|Price / Commercial
||5 = most financially attractive to Authority
||Score awarded on inverse percentage difference from most financially attractive offer to the Authority* Abnormally Low Tenders may be removed from the evaluation process if the Authority deems them to be unacceptable. This is to prevent their commercial score skewing subsequent scoring
(*) Prices will be benchmarked and scores awarded based on the lowest compliant bid. The most financially attractive offer to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office following detailed analysis will receive the maximum score available with the remaining bids awarded scores based upon an inverse percentage of the difference in price.