Competition – press release

CMA proposes better deal for bank customers

Banks must address long-term problems and make it easier for customers to take charge of their accounts, the CMA stated today.

Publishing its provisional findings (PDF, 696KB, 36 pages) as part of an in-depth investigation into the £16 billion current account and business banking sectors, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has found that banks do not have to work hard enough to compete for customers.

The investigation has identified a number of competition problems in both the personal current account (PCA) and small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) banking markets. Low levels of customer switching mean that banks are not put under enough competitive pressure, and new products and new banks do not attract customers quickly enough. There is a particular problem in SME banking where many SMEs open their business current accounts (BCA) at the same bank where they have their PCA, then stick with that bank for their business loans.

57% of consumers have been with their PCA provider for more than 10 years, and 37% for more than 20 years. Customers with current accounts are faced with complex overdraft charges and limited information on product and service quality, which, along with limited effective comparison tools, makes it very difficult for customers to know what they are paying and to compare banks and products.

Bank customers fear that switching their current account to a new bank will be complicated, time-consuming and risky. The Current Account Switch Service (CASS) was set up to make the process easier and is functioning reasonably well, but awareness and confidence remain low. Only 3% of customers switched their PCA in 2014 and just 16% looked at alternative accounts.

The CMA found that overdraft users are even less likely to switch PCAs than other users. Heavy overdraft users, in particular, could save up to £260 a year if they switched. On average, current account users could save £70 a year by switching.

The investigation also discovered that accounts which are more expensive and below average quality are not losing customers to cheaper and better alternatives at the rate that would be expected in a well-functioning market.

The lack of competitive pressure in SME banking is highlighted by the fact that more than 50% of start-ups looking for a SME account choose the bank with which they have a personal current account, over 90% stay with their BCA when the initial free banking period comes to an end, and around 90% then go to their BCA provider when they are looking for business loans.

As in the case of PCAs, the opening and/or switching process is seen to be time-consuming, and at risk of things going wrong. SME charging structures are complex and difficult to compare, there are no service quality measures to aid comparison and there are limited effective price comparison tools for SMEs.

The CMA investigation did find a number of positive developments: new entrants into both PCA and SME banking, innovative products becoming available, the digital innovations associated with online and mobile banking, and new tools like Midata and CASS, which have the potential to increase searching and switching.

Despite these encouraging developments, because too few customers are switching, banks do not have strong enough incentives to work hard to compete for customers through better products or cheaper prices, and smaller or better banks find it hard to gain a foothold.

The CMA has published an initial list of remedies (PDF, 902KB, 47 pages) , which sets out possible measures aimed at addressing these issues by increasing competition and securing a better deal for customers. It will develop these proposals over the coming months. It is important that any new remedies are really effective, so the CMA will be testing its proposals carefully.

Potential remedies include:

  • Requiring banks to prompt customers to review the service they receive from their bank through receiving individual messages at certain ‘trigger points’. These trigger points could include a loss of service, closure of their local branch, unarranged overdraft charges or a change in the terms and conditions of their account. In the case of SMEs a key trigger point could come at the end of free banking periods.
  • Making it easier for consumers and businesses to compare bank products by upgrading Midata, an industry online tool, launched with the support of government, that gives consumers access to their banking history at the touch of a button. Midata allows consumers to easily access their banking data from their bank and input it directly into a price comparison website which can then analyse their transactions, and alert them to available bank accounts which best suit their needs. An improved Midata could have a radical impact on consumer choice in retail banking markets.
  • Requiring the creation of a new price comparison website for SMEs - currently nothing effective exists to fulfil this role.
  • Requiring banks to help raise public awareness of, and confidence in, switching bank accounts, through increasing their funding for a widespread and sustained advertising campaign promoting CASS and improving the service it offers.
  • Requiring better sharing of information with credit reference agencies, banks and financial advisers - making it easier for SMEs to shop around for loans and cutting out the need for multiple application form filling.

The CMA provisionally decided not to recommend remedies aimed at ending free if-in-credit (FIIC) accounts as it saw no convincing evidence that the prevalence of the FIIC model distorted competition, noted that some banks have already devised accounts which compete with FIIC through the rewards they offer, and also noted that FIIC accounts give a reasonable deal to many customers.

Structural remedies, such as forcing the break-up of banks, were also provisionally rejected as it was decided that they were not likely to be effective in addressing the competition concerns found. The problems in the market are unlikely to be resolved by creating more, smaller banks; it is the underlying issue of lack of switching which has to be addressed.

Alasdair Smith, Chairman of the retail banking investigation, said:

Banking is a sector of huge importance that affects every household and business in the country.

We think customers need to be put in charge of their banking.

There have been long-standing concerns about the retail banking market, where many customers could save money and get better services by switching accounts. This investigation was an opportunity to take a detailed and independent look at the sector.

Despite some encouraging developments, particularly in the shape of challengers that have entered the market in recent years, for too long banks have been able to sit back and take their existing customers for granted.

We don’t think that customers will truly benefit from a more competitive marketplace until they can compare accounts more easily and feel confident that they can switch without risk, and that is why our provisional remedies are aimed at giving customers control.

We are considering a series of measures that will have a far-reaching impact on how banks operate and will empower account-holders to search for and switch to the account that suits them.

The investigation is looking separately at Northern Ireland, but has made the same findings for Northern Ireland as it has for Great Britain.

The full provisional findings report along with over 30 appendices will be published later next week. The CMA will now consult and hold detailed discussions with all interested parties on the findings and possible remedies ahead of publishing its final report in May 2016. The CMA is also reviewing measures put in place by its predecessor body, the Competition Commission, in 2002 and 2008, to remedy concerns in the SME banking and Northern Ireland personal current account sectors.

Submissions in response to the provisional findings and notice of possible remedies are invited in writing by 20 November 2015, either by email to retailbanking@cma.gsi.gov.uk or to:

Retail banking market investigation
Competition and Markets Authority
Victoria House
Southampton Row
London
WC1B 4AD

Notes for editors

  1. The CMA is the UK’s primary competition and consumer authority. It is an independent non-ministerial government department with responsibility for carrying out investigations into mergers, markets and the regulated industries and enforcing competition and consumer law.
  2. The members of the Retail Banking Market Investigation Group are Alasdair Smith (Chair), Tom Hoehn, Philip Marsden, Jill May, and Ed Smith. The appointed investigation group act as the decision-makers and have been chosen from the CMA’s panel members, who come from a variety of backgrounds, including economics, law, accountancy and business.
  3. To date, the investigation has received over 50 submissions, commissioned 6 surveys and research, held 14 hearings, visited 12 banks and building societies, met stakeholders in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and published 16 working papers.
  4. All information relating to the investigation, including the timetable for the rest of the investigation as well as submissions, hearing summaries and working papers, is available on the retail banking case page.
  5. In its investigation, the CMA is required to decide whether ‘any feature, or combination of features, of each relevant market prevents, restricts or distorts competition in connection with the supply or acquisition of any goods or services in the United Kingdom or a part of the United Kingdom’. If so, then there is an adverse effect on competition and the CMA will also consider whether this is resulting in a detrimental effect on customers such as higher prices, lower quality or less choice of goods or services. The CMA will then decide whether it should introduce remedies to tackle the adverse effect on competition or detrimental effect on customers so far as it has resulted from, or may be expected to result from, that adverse effect on competition, or whether it should recommend action be taken by other bodies to remedy the adverse effects on competition, and if so, what action should be taken. If the CMA finds that there is no adverse effect on competition, the question of remedies will not arise.
  6. For more information on the CMA see our homepage or follow us on Twitter @CMAgovuk, Flickr and LinkedIn. Sign up to our email alerts to receive updates on markets cases.
  7. Enquiries should be directed to Kasia Reardon (kasia.reardon@cma.gsi.gov.uk), 020 3738 6901 or Simon Belgard (simon.belgard@cma.gsi.gov.uk, 020 3738 6472).