Consultation outcome

Capacity Market: proposals to simplify and improve accessibility in future capacity auctions

This consultation has concluded

Download the full outcome

Consultation response

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@beis.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Analytical annex

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@beis.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Detail of outcome

This is the government response to the October 2016 consultation on the Capacity Market (“CM”). The consultation sought views on a number of essentially technical changes to the CM Rules and Regulations to simplify and improve certain areas, in light of learning from previous auctions.

Original consultation

Summary

The method by which Capacity Market (CM) costs are recouped has the potential to give an unfair advantage to small embedded generation including diesel. We are engaging stakeholders on proposed regulatory changes to remove this potential advantage, along with a number of technical changes.

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

The Capacity Market is designed to promote fair competition in order to discover the lowest sustainable price at which the necessary capacity can be brought forward to ensure security of electricity supply in Great Britain. In light of learning from previous auctions, we are proposing a number of essentially technical changes to the Capacity Market Rules and Regulations to simplify and improve certain areas.

One important proposed change would be to calculate the Capacity Market supplier charge - the method by which Capacity Market costs are recouped from suppliers - on the basis of gross rather than net demand. Many stakeholders have suggested that the current arrangements may favour small embedded generation, including diesel. The proposed change would remove a possible advantage, potentially affecting the bids of such embedded generators in the forthcoming auction(s). We are also seeking views on a number of other changes as set out in the consultation letter, the detailed proposals, and the indicative drafting.

Documents

Letter - Capacity Market: proposals to simplify and improve accessibility in future capacity auctions

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@beis.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Detailed proposals - Capacity Market: proposals to simplify and improve accessibility in future capacity auctions

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@beis.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Indicative drafting - Capacity Market: proposals to simplify and improve accessibility in future capacity auctions

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@beis.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Published 28 October 2016
Last updated 22 March 2017 + show all updates
  1. Consultation response.
  2. First published.