Advisory Committee on Clinical Excellence Awards: triennial review
This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government
This consultation has concluded
Download the full outcome
Detail of outcome
The main conclusion of the review was that ACCEA performs necessary functions. The review report also contains recommendations to improve performance, governance and efficiency.
This consultation ran from
Seeks views on the role and performance of the Advisory Committee on Clinical Excellence Awards (ACCEA).
The department is reviewing all its arm’s length bodies once every 3 years.
This triennial (3 yearly) review looks at what ACCEA does and how.
We want to know what you think about:
- whether ACCEA needs to continue in its current form
- how ACCEA is performing
- whether ACCEA is providing good value