MM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2018] UKUT 93 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Jacobs on 20 March 2018.

• From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
• Published: 10 April 2018

• Categories: Personal independence payment – general, Tribunal procedure and practice
• Sub-categories: Tribunal procedure and practice - statements of reasons
• Judges: Jacobs, E
• Decision date: 20 March 2018

Read the full decision in CPIP 3058 2017-00.

Judicial Summary

In order to be adequate, a tribunal’s reasons must deal with the arguments put by the claimant. Structuring reasons around the legal conditions of entitlement can leave it unclear how a decision was made.

Published 10 April 2018