KL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2016] UKUT 545 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Hemingway on 2 December 2016.

• From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
• Published: 23 December 2016

• Categories: Personal independence payment – mobility activities
• Sub-categories: Personal independence payment – mobility activities - Mobility activity 2: moving around
• Judges: Hemingway, M
• Decision date: 2 December 2016

Read the full decision in CPIP/2292/2016.

Judicial Summary

Can a slower than normal pace of walking which is nevertheless “within a reasonable time period” or defined, be considered as one of a range of factors when occasioning whether the walking is being carried out “to an acceptable standard?

Published 23 December 2016