KL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP):  UKUT 545 (AAC)
- Ministry of Justice, HM Courts & Tribunals Service, and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
- 23 December 2016
- Decision date:
- 2 December 2016
- Personal independence payment – mobility activities
- Personal independence payment – mobility activities - Mobility activity 2: moving around
- Hemingway, M
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Hemingway on 2 December 2016.
Read the full decision in CPIP/2292/2016.
Can a slower than normal pace of walking which is nevertheless “within a reasonable time period” or defined, be considered as one of a range of factors when occasioning whether the walking is being carried out “to an acceptable standard?
Published: 23 December 2016
Decision date: 2 December 2016