Official Statistics

Planning Inspectorate statistical release 22 November 2025

Published 22 January 2026

Applies to England

1. Introduction

This statistical release provides summary information on appeals, which represent the highest volume (in terms of number of cases) of the Planning Inspectorate’s work. For details of what cases are included within the release see the textbox after Table 9.

These statistics are produced each quarter, and the focus is on timeliness of decision-making, an area of particular interest for stakeholders. Information on the decisions that have been made is also included; and on the number of Inspectors available to make those decisions.

We have released two Excel files with tables at the same time as this report. The tables show the number of cases received, decided and allowed since 2010, broken down by case type.

Planning Inspectorate Quarterly and Annual Volume Statistics - GOV.UK

These statistics have been published to ensure everyone has equal access to the information and to support the Planning Inspectorate’s commitment to release information where possible.

This statistical bulletin provides:

• The time taken to reach decisions
• Appeals, decisions and events held, from January to December 2025
• The number of open cases
• The number of Inspectors
• The number of section 78 appeals received compared to decided, and the proportion allowed, in the last 5 years

The Planning Inspectorate

The Planning Inspectorate makes decisions and provides recommendations and advice on a range of land use and planning-related issues across England.

The Planning Inspectorate deals with planning appeals, national infrastructure planning applications, examinations of local plans and other planning-related and specialist casework in England. The Planning Inspectorate is an executive agency, sponsored by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.

1.1 Summary

Time to decide cases

The median decision time for cases decided in December was 18 weeks.

Median timeliness by procedure type is shown in the summary table below.

Procedure type	Last 12 months	December 2025
Written Representations	23 weeks	18 weeks
Hearings	25 weeks	24 weeks
Inquiries	29 weeks	30 weeks
All Cases	23 weeks	18 weeks

The median time for planning cases was 16 weeks in December 2025. The 12-month median was 21 weeks. The median decision time for all cases has been coming down over the last year as seen in Figure 1 below.

Enforcement decisions made in December 2025 had a median decision time of 62 weeks, with the 12-month median being 61 weeks.

The median time for planning appeals decided by inquiry under the Rosewell Process in December was 31 weeks and over the 12 months to December 2025 was 28 weeks.

Decisions

The Planning Inspectorate made 19,985 appeal decisions in the last 12 months, an average of 1,665 per month. The number of decisions in December 2025 was 1,679.

There were 18,743 decisions made on written representations during the last 12 months, with 1,592 in December 2025.

There were 836 decisions made on hearings during the last 12 months, with 53 in December 2025.

There were 405 decisions made on inquiries during the last 12 months, with 33 in December 2025.

Planning Inspectors

There were 473 Planning Inspectors employed by the Inspectorate at the end of December 2025.

Section 78 Appeals

The allowed rate for Section 78 planning appeals was 30% for October 2025 to December 2025. Figure 8 shows that the Planning Inspectorate decided more cases than were received for 9 out of the last 10 quarters.

Please note the Planning Inspectorate has reordered this release to make it easier to read. As a result of this the tables have been reordered as well, please refer to Annex F for how they have changed.

To help determine whether this has been helpful, please send any feedback on these changes to: statistics@planninginspectorate.gov.uk

2. Decision Timeliness

It is important for people to know how long an appeal is going to take, so that they can make informed plans and decisions. This section covers the timeliness of decisions (i.e., how long it takes to make a decision) across appeal casework.

Planning Inspectors work on a broader range of work than the cases featured in this release. For example, they also work on examining Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project applications, Local Plans, Compulsory Purchase Order applications and many other specialist licencing/ application types.

How is timeliness measured 

The time to make a decision is measured from the time the Inspectorate have enough information for the case to proceed (it is deemed ‘valid’) to the time a decision letter is issued. This means that any delay in ‘validating’ the appeal is included in the time to make a decision. 

The decisions made in a given month will include those that started many months before, and thus do not give an accurate indication of how long appeals submitted, or deemed ‘valid’ in that month, will take.

Table 1 below shows that the median time to make a decision, across all cases in the last 12 months, was 23 weeks. The median time for decisions made in December 2025 was 18 weeks. Figure 1 shows the monthly median has ranged from 18 to 28 weeks over last 12 months.

Table 1 also shows the mean decision time for the last 12 months is 31 weeks. Each month the median is less than the mean, due to the impact of very long cases. This is illustrated in figure 1. Also included in the table is the standard deviation of decision timeliness, which is a measure of variation.

Table 1: Median, Mean and Standard Deviation of Time to Decision; January to December 2025.6

Note 1: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex E for further information.

Month	Jan-25	Feb-25	Mar-25	Apr-25	May-25	Jun-25	Jul-25	Aug-25	Sep-25	Oct-25	Nov-25	Dec-25	Total
Valid to Decision (median weeks)	28.1	28	25.9	26	24.6	24.7	22.1	19.9	20.1	19.7	18.1	18.4	23.1
Valid to Decision (mean weeks)	33.9	33.1	31.3	30.9	31.4	31.9	30.2	29.3	30	29.1	27.7	28.9	30.6
Standard Deviation (weeks)	22	20.5	22.2	21.2	24.1	25.5	25.8	28	27.5	25.7	26.4	25.9	24.8

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

What are mean, median, and standard deviation?

Measure	Definition
Mean	The total time taken divided by the number of cases. Also referred to as the ‘average’. A measure of how long each case would take, if the total time taken was spread evenly across all cases.
Median	This is the time taken by the ‘middle’ case if all cases were sorted from quickest to longest
Standard deviation	This is a measure of variability or spread. It is calculated by examining how much each value differs from the mean. A higher standard deviation means the individual decision times vary more widely around the mean. A lower standard deviation would demonstrate greater consistency in the Planning Inspectorate’s decision timeliness.

Figure 1: Median and Mean Time to Decision; January to December 2025.

Line chart showing data in Table 1 (above)

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

3. Decisions, Events & Open Cases

The Planning Inspectorate has made 19,985 appeal decisions in the last 12 months. There were 1,679 cases decided in December 2025, with a monthly average of 1,665 over the past 12 months. Some of these outcomes are not final decisions but recommendations. These occur in cases that have been ‘called in’ or in section 78 appeals that have been ‘recovered’ for the Secretary of State to decide. In those situations, inspectors provide a recommendation rather than making the decision themselves.

Table 2 below shows the monthly breakdown with the highest number of decisions in July 2025 and lowest in August 2025.

The number of events recorded for December 2025 was 1,252, with a monthly average of 1,646 over the past 12 months.

The median valid to decision time was 18 weeks in December 2025, as shown in Figure 2 and Table 2 below.

There are no clear trends for the number of events and decisions per month. However, the Christmas break typically impacts on the number of events arranged for December.

Figure 2: Number of events held, decisions issued and median time between valid date & decision date; January to December 2025.

Note: Annex C has this chart for just decisions (previously Figure 3)

Bar and Line chart showing data in Table 2 (below)

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

Table 2: Number of events held, decisions issued and median time between valid date & decision date; January to December 2025.

Note: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex E for further information

Month	Jan-25	Feb-25	Mar-25	Apr-25	May-25	Jun-25	Jul-25	Aug-25	Sep-25	Oct-25	Nov-25	Dec-25	Total
Events held	1757	1696	1696	1815	1389	1747	1806	1434	1828	1673	1661	1252	19754
Decisions	1576	1604	1734	1538	1541	1777	1910	1522	1653	1721	1730	1679	19985
Median	28.1	28	25.9	26	24.6	24.7	22.1	19.9	20.1	19.7	18.1	18.4	23.1

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

Figure 3 below shows the number of cases received, closed and open for each of the last 12 months. The number of cases closed has exceeded the number of cases received for each of the past 12 months. The number of open cases has been reducing steadily over the past 12 months.

Figure 3: Number of cases received, closed and open; January to December 2025.

Note: The number of cases closed is higher than the number of decisions, as it includes cases where an appeal is withdrawn, notice is withdrawn, or the appeal is turned away.

Bar and Line chart showing data in Table 3 (below)

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

Table 3: Number of cases received, closed and open; January to December 2025.

Note 1: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex E for further information

Note 2: There is a known anomaly that means that the number of open cases does not exactly follow the volumes of cases closed or received (for example the number of open cases can increase between months even though the number closed exceeded the number received). The main reasons for this have been identified and are detailed in the Background Quality Report.

Note 3: The open cases have been downloaded from a Development environment. P please see the BQR for more information

Month	Jan-25	Feb-25	Mar-25	Apr-25	May-25	Jun-25	Jul-25	Aug-25	Sep-25	Oct-25	Nov-25	Dec-25	Total
Received	1534	1501	1480	1564	1624	1551	1737	1465	1679	1620	1690	1570	19015
Closed	1737	1768	1907	1711	1718	1960	2080	1668	1808	1901	1867	1844	21969
Open	12818	12594	12122	11989	11902	11428	11121	10925	10792	10451	10309	9939

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

At the end of December 2025, the Planning Inspectorate had 9,939 cases open. More information on how the number of open cases has changed over the past 12 months, is in Table 3 and Figure 3 above. 

For wider context on planning activity, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government publishes national statistics on planning applications in England. These can be found in the Live tables on planning application statistics

The open cases comprised of 8,770 cases being handled through written representations; 326 through hearings; and 303 through inquiries, as well as 391 not currently allocated a procedure type. This is not the number of ‘live’ hearings and inquiries since it includes cases where the event (hearing or inquiry) has yet to start, as well as those where the event has finished but the decision has yet to be issued. 

Table 4: Open cases by procedure and stage, as of end of December 2025.

Note 1: There are 540 cases that have no procedure type recorded (see Background Quality Report for more detail) These are excluded from the row and column totals in the table below. They have been added to the overall total. 

Note 2: There is a known anomaly that means that the number of open cases does not exactly follow the volumes of cases closed or received (for example the number of open cases can increase between months even though the number closed exceeded the number received).  The main reasons for this have been identified and are detailed in the Background Quality Report.

Stage	WR	HRG	INQ	Total
Case received but yet to be deemed valid	262	4	2	268
Case deemed valid but yet to “start”	1381	67	81	1529
Case started but event has not yet happened	5864	198	150	6212
Event happened but decision not issued	1263	57	70	1390
Total	8770	326	303	9399

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals 

4. Decisions by Procedure

The large majority of decisions over the past 12 months (18,743) were made on written representations. This is 94% of all appeal decisions made. Table 5 shows that written representation decisions have varied from 1,422 to 1,803 per month over the past 12 months.

There were 836 decisions made on hearings during the last 12 months, the monthly average being 70. During December 2025, 53 decisions were made for hearings. In December 2025, 33 decisions were made for inquiries. Decisions for inquiries per month over the last 12 months have ranged between 20 and 66.

Table 5 below gives the numbers of appeal decisions made broken down by whether the case was dealt with by written representations, hearings, or inquiries.

Table 5: Appeal Decisions by Procedure; January to December 2025.

Month	Jan- 25	Feb- 25	Mar- 25	Apr- 25	May- 25	Jun- 25	Jul- 25	Aug- 25	Sep- 25	Oct- 25	Nov- 25	Dec- 25	Total
Written Representations	1,431	1,445	1,585	1,455	1,422	1,704	1,803	1,447	1,573	1,639	1,647	1,592	18,743
Hearings	117	93	109	63	75	50	64	48	59	49	56	53	836
Inquiries	28	66	40	20	44	23	43	27	21	33	27	33	405
Total	1,576	1,604	1,734	1,538	1,541	1,777	1,910	1,522	1,653	1,721	1,730	1,678	19,984

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

Figure 4 – Appeal Decisions by Procedure; January to December 2025.

Pie chart showing totals from Table 5 (above)

Procedure Type

Table 6 below shows decision timeliness broken down by the procedure type. Hearings and inquires have typically been more variable than written representations. Because over 90% of cases are by written representation, the timeliness measures for written representations are similar to the measure across all cases.

Where a small number of cases has been decided, the average timeliness (whether mean or median) is less meaningful as a measure than where there are many cases.

Median times are less affected by a small number of large values than mean times, so are the focus of this commentary. The median time for written representations over the 12 months to December 2025 is 23 weeks. The median time for hearings over the 12 months to December 2025 is 25 weeks. The median time to decide for inquiries over the 12 months to December 2025 was 29 weeks.

Table 6: Mean and Median Time to Decision, with Standard Deviation, by Procedure; January to December 2025.

Note 1: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex E for further information

Key: WR= Written Representations; HRG= Hearings; INQ= Inquiries; All= All Cases

Measure	Procedure	Jan-25	Feb-25	Mar-25	Apr-25	May-25	Jun-25	Jul-25	Aug-25	Sep-25	Oct-25	Nov-25	Dec-25	Total
Valid to decision (median weeks)	Written Representations	27.7	27.9	25.6	26.0	24.3	24.5	21.9	19.4	19.6	19.6	17.8	17.9	22.9
Valid to decision (median weeks)	Hearings	35.4	27.7	26.9	24.1	23.6	23.4	22.4	23.4	23.9	22.1	24.7	24.1	25.1
Valid to decision (median weeks)	Inquiries	39.9	51.0	27.3	48.2	29.1	34.3	26.4	25.9	29.0	21.7	24.6	30.3	29.3
Valid to decision (median weeks)	All Cases	28.1	28.0	25.9	26.0	24.6	24.7	22.1	19.9	20.1	19.7	18.1	18.4	23.1
Valid to decision (mean weeks)	Written Representations	33.0	32.0	30.1	30.4	31.2	31.6	29.7	29.2	29.8	29.3	27.4	28.6	30.1
Valid to decision (mean weeks)	Hearings	36.4	42.4	44.6	31.9	28.8	30.7	40.2	29.7	33.3	31.5	30.2	30.0	35.4
Valid to decision (mean weeks)	Inquiries	66.9	43.6	42.7	64.6	40.9	53.4	37.4	32.6	36.3	16.7	39.0	41.7	42.0
Valid to decision (mean weeks)	All Cases	33.9	33.1	31.3	30.9	31.4	31.9	30.2	29.3	30.0	29.1	27.7	28.9	30.6
Standard Deviation (weeks)	Written Representations	20.5	19.6	20.1	20.4	24.2	25.4	25.3	28.5	27.7	25.8	26.4	26.1	24.5
Standard Deviation (weeks)	Hearings	18.1	29.0	33.1	19.2	16.5	16.7	35.0	15.6	22.0	25.0	15.5	16.0	24.4
Standard Deviation (weeks)	Inquiries	55.9	17.5	39.9	44.0	26.5	36.9	25.8	17.8	23.6	13.3	36.6	27.4	33.1
Standard Deviation (weeks)	All Cases	22.0	20.5	22.2	21.2	24.1	25.5	25.8	28.0	27.5	25.7	26.4	25.9	24.8
Decisions	Written Representations	1,431	1,445	1,585	1,455	1,422	1,704	1,803	1,447	1,573	1,639	1,647	1,592	18,743
Decisions	Hearings	117	93	109	63	75	50	64	48	59	49	56	53	836
Decisions	Inquiries	28	66	40	20	44	23	43	27	21	33	27	33	405
Decisions	Total	1,576	1,604	1,734	1,538	1,541	1,777	1,910	1,522	1,653	1,721	1,730	1,679	19,985

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

The standard deviation information indicates that for all three procedures, there is considerable variation, meaning times are widely spread about the mean.

Planning Inquiry Decisions

For planning appeals decided by the inquiry process, The Planning Inspectorate has been implementing recommendations from the Rosewell review.

The median time for inquiries under Rosewell process over the 12 months to December 2025 is 28 weeks and the median time to decision for December 2025 was 31 weeks. 

Table 7: Decisions, Median and Mean Time to Decision, Planning Inquiry Cases under Rosewell Process; January to December 2025.

Note: where there are fewer than 20 decisions, the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful.

Measure	Jan- 25	Feb- 25	Mar- 25	Apr- 25	May- 25	Jun- 25	Jul- 25	Aug- 25	Sep- 25	Oct- 25	Nov- 25	Dec- 25	Total
Decisions	11	23	15	12	18	15	22	7	11	3	10	20	167
Median (weeks)	24.0	25.1	27.0	28.1	28.5	34.0	26.4	38.6	26.7	28.7	25.2	31.1	28.0
Mean (weeks)	28.4	27.3	30.2	35.0	35.1	35.9	30.7	41.1	30.2	33.3	27.0	38.0	32.4
St. Dev. (weeks)	12.0	8.4	7.9	17.3	13.6	13.8	9.4	12.8	13.4	10.0	8.9	16.6	13.0

Figure 5 below shows the mean and median time to decision for planning inquiry cases under the Rosewell process.

Figure 5: Median and Mean Time to Decision, Rosewell Inquiry Process; January to December 2025.

Line chart showing data in Table 7 (above)

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

Most inquiry decisions now being issued are under the revised ‘Rosewell’ process but some inquiries, for example those that are linked together with associated enforcement cases, do not follow the Rosewell process.

Table 8: Decisions, Planning Inquiry Cases under non-Rosewell Process; January to December 2025.

Month	Jan- 25	Feb- 25	Mar- 25	Apr- 25	May- 25	Jun- 25	Jul- 25	Aug- 25	Sep- 25	Oct- 25	Nov- 25	Dec- 25	Total
Decisions	1	1	0	1	4	2	0	1	0	2	0	1	13

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

5. Decisions by Casework Category

The majority of cases decided over the past 12 months were planning (16,232). This is about 81% of all appeal decisions made. There were 2,819 enforcement decisions and 934 specialist decisions. These totals are also shown in Table 7 below and Figure 5 below.

Trends for planning decisions show similar patterns to written representations. The average number of enforcement decisions over the past 12 months was 235. Specialist casework figures continue to vary each month, from a high of 115 in June 2025 to a low of 44 in August 2025.

Table 9: Appeal Decisions by Casework Category; January to December 2025.

Month	Jan- 25	Feb- 25	Mar- 25	Apr- 25	May- 25	Jun- 25	Jul- 25	Aug- 25	Sep- 25	Oct- 25	Nov- 25	Dec- 25	Total
Planning	1,255	1,314	1,439	1,286	1,255	1,460	1,559	1,279	1,324	1,327	1,412	1,322	16,232
Enforcement	230	226	241	195	204	202	238	199	255	316	244	269	2,819
Specialist	91	64	54	57	82	115	113	44	74	78	74	88	934
Total	1,576	1,604	1,734	1,538	1,541	1,777	1,910	1,522	1,653	1,721	1,730	1,679	19,985

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

What are Planning cases? The Planning category includes s78 planning appeals, householder appeals, commercial appeals, listed building consent appeals, advertisement appeals, s106 planning obligation appeals and Called In Planning Applications.

What are Enforcement cases? Enforcement covers enforcement appeals (i.e., appeals against the issue of an enforcement notice served by a local planning authority for alleged breaches of planning control), enforcement listed building notice appeals and lawful development certificate appeals.

What are Specialist cases? Specialist casework includes Common Land, Rights of Way orders (including Schedule 14 cases), Purchase orders, Tree Preservation Orders, High Hedges appeals, Hedgerow appeals, Wayleave, Compulsory Purchase Orders, Secretary of State, Transport, Environmental Permitting Appeals and Coastal Access. Additional casework types have been added to this category over time.

Figure 6 – Appeal Decisions by Casework Category; January to December 2025.

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

Pie chart showing totals from Table 9 (above)

Casework Category

The nature of the cases the Planning Inspectorate deal with varies widely and several factors play a part in determining how long it takes to make a decision. One such factor is the type of casework. Table 10 below shows the time taken to decide, in planning cases, in enforcement cases, and in specialist cases, as does Figure 6.

The median time to decision for planning cases (there are many more of these decisions than in the other categories) is lower than for enforcement cases; and less variable than the times for specialist cases.

Table 10: Median, Mean and Standard Deviation of Time to Decision – Planning, Enforcement, Specialist Cases; January to December 2025.

Note 1: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex E for further information

Casework Category	Measure	Jan- 25	Feb- 25	Mar- 25	Apr- 25	May- 25	Jun- 25	Jul- 25	Aug- 25	Sep- 25	Oct- 25	Nov- 25	Dec- 25	Total
Planning Cases	Valid to Decision (median weeks)	26.4	25.9	23.7	23.9	22.7	22.3	20.0	17.9	17.7	16.9	16.0	15.9	20.6
	Valid to Decision (mean weeks)	27.6	26.8	25.1	25.1	24.5	24.3	22.1	20.6	20.1	19.5	18.5	19.5	22.8
	St. dev. of decision (weeks)	11.9	11.1	12.1	12.7	13.6	14.4	11.4	12.4	11.6	10.2	10.9	12.4	12.5
Enforcement Cases	Valid to Decision (median weeks)	53.4	51.0	55.6	59.6	52.6	64.9	59.4	73.4	67.9	62.8	70.6	61.7	61.3
	Valid to Decision (mean weeks)	60.6	60.1	60.2	63.3	61.6	68.2	64.7	73.9	69.3	62.2	69.7	67.8	65.1
	St. dev. of decision (weeks)	33.2	28.0	31.8	28.7	33.6	36.6	37.8	37.1	37.2	34.7	35.1	32.5	34.3
Specialist Cases	Valid to Decision (median weeks)	48.4	70.3	69.9	36.4	63.7	60.4	73.4	82.6	70.4	54.2	60.1	53.8	61.6
	Valid to Decision (mean weeks)	53.2	65.6	67.8	51.9	62.2	64.4	71.2	79.8	72.6	59.1	63.6	53.0	63.3
	St. dev. of decision (weeks)	30.5	27.4	36.8	30.9	36.5	31.7	37.9	51.7	29.6	32.1	35.6	27.6	34.7

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

Annex A gives information on median and mean time to decision, with standard deviation, for the three procedure types, split by planning, enforcement, and specialist casework categories.

Enforcement decisions made in the past 12 months had a median decision time of 61 weeks.

There are considerably fewer specialist cases which means results are more liable to be distorted by extreme values

Figure 7 – Median Time to Decision by Casework Category: January to December 2025

Line chart showing data in Table 10 (above)

Source: Horizon and Manage Appeals

Note that this release includes information on the mean and median times from valid to decision, for selected appeal types. The information published also breaks down the time for each stage of the process. See Annex B for further details.

6. Inspectors

Table 11 below shows the number of Inspectors in the Planning Inspectorate in each month from January to December 2025. This includes headcount (i.e. the number of different individuals) and full-time equivalents (FTE) where those working part time are counted in proportion with their contracted hours. There were 473 Planning Inspectors employed by the Inspectorate in December 2025 – with a full-time equivalent of 429.

Table 11: Planning Inspectors – Headcount and FTE; January to December 2025 (at end of month)

Month	Jan- 25	Feb- 25	Mar- 25	Apr- 25	May- 25	Jun- 25	Jul- 25	Aug- 25	Sep- 25	Oct- 25	Nov- 25	Dec- 25
Headcount	457	457	457	455	452	448	446	445	457	455	476	473
FTE	414.7	415.1	414.8	412.5	408.7	404.5	403.2	402.0	412.9	411.2	431.7	429.4

Source: Employee Central

As above, Planning Inspectors work on a broader range of work than the appeals featured in this release. Please note that data on Planning Inspectors is only applicable to salaried employees (it does not include fixed term contract Inspectors or Planning Appeal Decision Suppliers, previously referred to as non-salaried Inspectors).

7. Exploring Section 78 Planning Appeals

The Inspectorate has published a series of tables of quarterly data alongside this bulletin.  Some of the data published is on casework types that The Planning Inspectorate deals with that are larger in scale, but smaller in volume, than the appeals decisions that are the subject of the preceding sections of these statistics.  Some examples of this are Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects and Local Plans, where volumes never go into the hundreds, and the time between submission to report issue can be over a year. Other data breaks appeals down into more detail than in the monthly totals.  

Appeals against refusal of Planning Permission (Section 78 appeals) 

The largest volume of casework dealt with by the Planning Inspectorate are appeals against refusal of Planning Permission, which are made under Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.  The analysis below deals with just this casework type. Similar data for other casework types can be found in the published tables. 

Number of appeals received compared to decisions issued.

In the last twelve months, January 2025 to December 2025, there have been 9,072 Section 78 planning appeals (s78) received, 3.9% lower than for the period January 2024 to December 2024. 

In the last five years (January 2021 to December 2025) the highest level of quarterly receipts (2,832) occurred in January to March 2021 and the highest number of decisions (2,758) was in July to September 2025.  Over the past year the average number of receipts per quarter was 2,268 and the average number of decisions per quarter was 2,586. 

The number of appeals received in October to December 2025 (2,422) was 7.3% higher than the same period in 2024.

Figure 8: Number of s78 Planning appeal, receipts and decisions, 2020/21 to 2025/26, by quarter.

Line chart showing data in Table A in Annex D

Source: Horizon & Picaso.  Full published data in Tables 2.1 and Table 2.4.

See Annex D, Table A, for full data table.    

The number of decisions issued in October to December 2025, was 5.8% lower than the previous quarter and 1.2% lower than the corresponding quarter last year. 

Appeals Allowed

The percentage of Section 78 planning appeals that were allowed in the latest quarter was 30%, lower than in the previous quarter (see figure 9). There were 786 appeals allowed between October and December 2025, 73 less than in the previous quarter.

The consistency in the overall percentage allowed is heavily influenced by the number of written representations appeals allowed, as this procedure type contributes by far the greatest number of decisions each year.  There has been slightly more variation in the percentage allowed for hearings and inquiries.  See Figure 10 below for further details.    

Figure 9: S78 planning appeals, percentage allowed, 2020/21 to 2025/26, by quarter.

Bar chart showing data in Table B in Annex D

Source: Horizon & Picaso.  Full published data in Table 2.4 s78 planning appeals decided.     See Annex D Table B, for full data table    

Figure 10: S78 planning appeals, percentage allowed by procedure type, 2020/21 to 2025/26, by quarter.

Line chart showing data in Table B in Annex C

Source: Horizon & Picaso.  Full published data in Table 2.4 s78 planning appeals decided.     See Annex D Table B, for full data table    

8. Annex A – Mean and median time to decision, with standard deviation, for planning, enforcement, and specialist casework

Planning

Note 1: where there are fewer than 20 decisions, the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful.

Note 2: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex E for further information

Planning	Measure	Jan-25	Feb-25	Mar-25	Apr-25	May-25	Jun-25	Jul-25	Aug-25	Sep-25	Oct-25	Nov-25	Dec-25	Total
Written Representations	Decisions	1193	1239	1366	1227	1184	1415	1498	1235	1279	1289	1363	1271	15559
Written Representations	Median Average Weeks	26.4	26	23.7	23.7	22.4	22	20	17.4	17.3	16.7	15.7	15.4	20.3
Written Representations	Mean Average Weeks	27.4	26.8	25	24.9	24.2	24.1	21.9	20.3	19.8	19.2	18.2	19	22.5
Written Representations	Standard Deviation Weeks	10.9	11	12	12.3	13.5	14.1	11.4	12.3	11.6	9.8	10.6	12	12.2
Hearings	Decisions	50	51	58	46	49	28	39	36	34	33	39	30	493
Hearings	Median Average Weeks	25.6	23.9	22.7	23.8	23	22.9	21.1	23.3	22.9	23.3	24.7	22.2	23
Hearings	Mean Average Weeks	30.6	27.7	26.1	26.4	25.2	24.6	22.7	27.7	25.3	28	29.6	24.6	26.7
Hearings	Standard Deviation Weeks	11.7	12.3	14.2	9.5	9.8	9.6	9.9	10.9	9.2	17.4	15.1	11.5	12.2
Inquiries	Decisions	12	24	15	13	22	17	22	8	11	5	10	21	180
Inquiries	Median Average Weeks	24.4	25.1	27	29.1	28.1	34	26.4	37.3	26.7	26.9	25.2	31.4	28.1
Inquiries	Mean Average Weeks	42	27.9	30.2	42.4	37.2	42	30.7	38.5	30.2	30.4	27	39.4	34.9
Inquiries	Standard Deviation Weeks	46.5	8.7	7.9	30.5	19	28.1	9.4	13.8	13.4	8.5	8.9	17.3	21.2
All Cases	Decisions	1255	1314	1439	1286	1255	1460	1559	1279	1324	1327	1412	1322	16232
All Cases	Median Average Weeks	26.4	25.9	23.7	23.9	22.7	22.3	20	17.9	17.7	16.9	16	15.9	20.6
All Cases	Mean Average Weeks	27.6	26.8	25.1	25.1	24.5	24.3	22.1	20.6	20.1	19.5	18.5	19.5	22.8
All Cases	Standard Deviation Weeks	11.9	11.1	12.1	12.7	13.6	14.4	11.4	12.4	11.6	10.2	10.9	12.4	12.5

Enforcement

Note 1: where there are fewer than 20 decisions, the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful

Note 2: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex E for further information.

Enforcement	Measure	Jan-25	Feb-25	Mar-25	Apr-25	May-25	Jun-25	Jul-25	Aug-25	Sep-25	Oct-25	Nov-25	Dec-25	Total
Written Representations	Decisions	159	153	174	176	160	186	203	175	228	275	219	242	2350
Written Representations	Median Average Weeks	71.3	63.4	57.1	60.8	64.4	66.4	60	81.4	72.6	68.4	74	63.7	67.5
Written Representations	Mean Average Weeks	66.8	62.2	62.1	63.6	69.1	70.4	66.4	80.4	72.8	68.6	74.1	71.5	69.3
Written Representations	Standard Deviation Weeks	30.4	29.1	29.5	26.5	32.6	35.6	36.7	34.6	36.3	31.6	32.9	31	32.9
Hearings	Decisions	62	35	47	14	25	13	19	10	20	13	14	18	290
Hearings	Median Average Weeks	35.6	46.7	60.6	25.6	37.7	20.1	49.4	23.4	23.9	21.1	20.2	24.4	35.4
Hearings	Mean Average Weeks	40.1	57.6	62.9	37.8	31.9	27.6	61.8	25.9	41	29.4	30.1	31.5	44
Hearings	Standard Deviation Weeks	20.6	33.5	35.6	22.7	14.6	13.2	44.6	10.9	30.4	30.7	17	14.7	30.4
Inquiries	Decisions	9	38	20	5	19	3	16	14	7	28	11	9	179
#Inquiries	Median Average Weeks	62.1	51	27.3	136.7	33.1	132.6	34	23.9	29.1	4.3	21.3	24.1	27.3
Inquiries	Mean Average Weeks	92.5	54.1	37.7	125.5	38	106.7	46.3	27.6	35.9	14.3	33.1	39.5	43.6
Inquiries	Standard Deviation Weeks	66	13.3	32.3	18	26.6	43	36.5	14	29.9	12.5	40.7	40.7	37.9
All Cases	Decisions	230	226	241	195	204	202	238	199	255	316	244	269	2819
All Cases	Median Average Weeks	53.4	51	55.6	59.6	52.6	64.9	59.4	73.4	67.9	62.8	70.6	61.7	61.3
All Cases	Mean Average Weeks	60.6	60.1	60.2	63.3	61.6	68.2	64.7	73.9	69.3	62.2	69.7	67.8	65.1
All Cases	Standard Deviation Weeks	33.2	28	31.8	28.7	33.6	36.6	37.8	37.1	37.2	34.7	35.1	32.5	34.3

Specialist

Note 1: where there are fewer than 20 decisions, the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful.

Note 2: This table includes revisions to previously published data. Please see Annex E for further information

Specialist	Measure	Jan-25	Feb-25	Mar-25	Apr-25	May-25	Jun-25	Jul-25	Aug-25	Sep-25	Oct-25	Nov-25	Dec-25	Total
Written Representations	Decisions	79	53	45	52	78	103	102	37	66	75	65	79	834
Written Representations	Median Average Weeks	48.4	72	68	36.4	62.5	60.9	76.4	91.1	73.1	53.3	61.2	50.5	60.9
Written Representations	Mean Average Weeks	51.5	66.5	61.5	49.5	60.4	65	71.9	85.3	74.4	58.2	64.2	52.2	62.9
Written Representations	Standard Deviation Weeks	29.7	26.7	29.1	30.8	35.8	32.8	38.2	52.9	30.1	32.2	35.4	28.3	34.8
Hearings	Decisions	5	7	4	3	1	9	6	2	5	3	3	5	53
Hearings	Median Average Weeks	43.6	86.1	94.6	98.7	126.4	49.6	83.3	84.4	48.6	87.6	31.9	63.6	65
Hearings	Mean Average Weeks	47.7	73.6	97.1	87.8	126.4	56.8	85.5	84.4	56.4	79.5	38.4	63.7	69.8
Hearings	Standard Deviation Weeks	20.3	28	19.5	15.5	0	16.9	24.9	3.9	16	18.2	9.3	0.9	26.4
Inquiries	Decisions	7	4	5	2	3	3	5	5	3	0	6	3	46
Inquiries	Median Average Weeks	81	38.6	113.9	56.3	102.9	66.6	27.6	18	67.9	-	66.7	79.7	56.4
Inquiries	Mean Average Weeks	76.5	39.1	99.6	56.3	86.8	64.6	38.6	37.2	59.4	-	70	64.7	63.7
Inquiries	Standard Deviation Weeks	34.6	20	67.7	0	30.7	20.3	25.1	26.6	22.2	-	39.9	25.4	40.5
All Cases	Decisions	91	64	54	57	82	115	113	44	74	78	74	88	934
All Cases	Median Average Weeks	48.4	70.3	69.9	36.4	63.7	60.4	73.4	82.6	70.4	54.2	60.1	53.8	61.6
All Cases	Mean Average Weeks	53.2	65.6	67.8	51.9	62.2	64.4	71.2	79.8	72.6	59.1	63.6	53	63.3
All Cases	Standard Deviation Weeks	30.5	27.4	36.8	30.9	36.5	31.7	37.9	51.7	29.6	32.1	35.6	27.6	34.7

9. Annex B – Detailed Information on timeliness (December 2025)

The information below shows the number and length of decisions made in December 2025:

Note: when there are fewer than 20 decisions the measures mean, median and standard deviation are less meaningful.

Casework Type	Procedure Type	Median (weeks)	Mean (weeks)	Decisions
s78 planning appeals	Written Representations	16.3	20.5	796
s78 planning appeals	Hearings	22.4	24.7	29
s78 planning appeals	Inquiries	31.1	38.2	20
Householder appeals	Written Representations	12.2	14.3	334
Enforcement appeals	Written Representations	63.7	71.5	242
Enforcement appeals	Hearings	24.4	31.5	18
Enforcement appeals	Inquiries	24.1	39.5	9

The smaller the number of decisions, the less helpful the mean and median are as measures for summarising performance. Particular care should be taken when there are fewer than twenty decisions.

The information published below shows the time taken for different stages of the appeals process:

Note: Only cases with both dates recorded appear in this table, meaning that numbers for cases decided and events recorded may be lower than those presented elsewhere.

Measure	s78 Written Representations	s78 Hearings	s78 Inquiries	Householder Appeals
Weeks between valid date & start date
Median (average)	0.7	2.2	2	0.9
Mean (average)	1	5.1	2.3	1.1
Cases that started in December 2025	534	32	13	207
Weeks between start date & event date
Median (Average)	10	14	13.8	8
Mean (Average)	13.8	15.7	13.4	9.6
Cases where an event occurred during December 2025	607	26	8	207
Weeks between event date & decision date
Median (average)	3.6	4.6	8.1	2.9
Mean (average)	4.6	5.7	15	4.4
Cases that have been decided in December 2025	793	29	20	333

Explanation of date terminology

Valid date	When a case is deemed to have been validly received. Note – this is not always the date the case was validated. If a case is validated after the date it was validly received, it is the date it was validly received that is the valid date.
Start date	When a timetable, on how the appeal will progress, is issued to both the appellant and local authority. This timetable tells the appellant when to submit the information the Inspectors need to determine the appeal. It also tells the local authority when to notify interested parties about the appeal.
Event date	When the site visit, hearing, or inquiry occurred.
Decision date	When the decision was issued by The Planning Inspectorate.

Find out more about the process here - https://www.gov.uk/appeal-planning-decision/after-you-appeal

10. Annex C – Number of decisions January to December 2025.

Note this is previously Figure 3 that has been moved due to the reorder.

Bar chart showing decisions per month from Table 2

11. Annex D – Volume Tables

Table A: s78 planning appeals received and decided, by quarter since 2020/21

Year	Quarter	Received	Decided
2020/21	Apr - Jun	2,609	1,514
	Jul - Sep	2,613	2,252
	Oct - Dec	2,781	2,879
	Jan - Mar	2,832	2,467
2021/22	Apr - Jun	2,580	2,319
	Jul - Sep	2,692	2,124
	Oct - Dec	2,729	2,212
	Jan - Mar	2,671	2,294
2022/23	Apr - Jun	2,811	2,024
	Jul - Sep	2,582	2,056
	Oct - Dec	2,654	2,601
	Jan - Mar	2,578	2,481
2023/24	Apr - Jun	2,461	2,143
	Jul - Sep	2,408	2,488
	Oct - Dec	2,410	2,467
	Jan - Mar	2,406	2,579
2024/25	Apr - Jun	2,379	2,351
	Jul - Sep	2,393	2,603
	Oct - Dec	2,259	2,625
	Jan - Mar	2,127	2,479
2025/26	Apr - Jun	2,279	2,501
	Jul - Sep	2,242	2,753

Table B: s78 planning appeals, percentage allowed by procedure type, 2020/21 to 2025/26

Year	Quarter	Written Representations	Hearings	Inquiries	All
2020/21	Apr - Jun	21%	37%	25%	21%
	Jul - Sep	24%	41%	55%	25%
	Oct - Dec	25%	37%	58%	26%
	Jan - Mar	25%	35%	53%	26%
2021/22	Apr - Jun	30%	34%	55%	31%
	Jul - Sep	27%	43%	58%	28%
	Oct - Dec	27%	41%	62%	28%
	Jan - Mar	28%	32%	54%	29%
2022/23	Apr - Jun	27%	34%	60%	29%
	Jul - Sep	26%	53%	65%	28%
	Oct - Dec	26%	51%	64%	29%
	Jan - Mar	28%	45%	66%	30%
2023/24	Apr - Jun	28%	41%	65%	30%
	Jul - Sep	27%	39%	38%	28%
	Oct - Dec	25%	48%	67%	27%
	Jan - Mar	27%	50%	53%	28%
2024/25	Apr - Jun	28%	40%	67%	29%
	Jul - Sep	28%	40%	52%	29%
	Oct - Dec	26%	50%	68%	28%
	Jan - Mar	31%	57%	69%	33%
2025/26	Apr - Jun	30%	48%	82%	32%
	Jul - Sep	29%	59%	76%	31%

Table C: s78 planning appeals, number allowed by procedure type, 2020/21 to 2025/26

Year	Quarter	Written Representations	Hearings	Inquiries	All
2020/21	Apr - Jun	304	19	2	325
	Jul - Sep	537	17	6	560
	Oct - Dec	695	38	22	755
	Jan - Mar	588	39	16	643
2021/22	Apr - Jun	632	40	39	711
	Jul - Sep	536	40	29	605
	Oct - Dec	553	41	24	618
	Jan - Mar	595	31	36	662
2022/23	Apr - Jun	509	37	34	580
	Jul - Sep	484	60	31	575
	Oct - Dec	602	89	51	742
	Jan - Mar	639	66	42	747
2023/24	Apr - Jun	555	61	30	646
	Jul - Sep	618	54	26	698
	Oct - Dec	558	63	40	661
	Jan - Mar	644	63	27	734
2024/25	Apr - Jun	607	46	29	682
	Jul - Sep	672	60	25	757
	Oct - Dec	642	63	36	741
	Jan - Mar	695	90	37	822
2025/26	Apr - Jun	699	56	40	795
	Jul - Sep	762	63	31	856

12. Annex E – Revisions to the data tables

This Annex lists all revisions made to the data since the last statistical release.

Note: Classed as a revision are any values which have changed by more than five (when measuring number of decisions/ cases) or more than 0.5 weeks (for mean, median or standard deviation of weeks).

Table	Revisions
Table 2	Events Held: October, November and December 2024, March, April and June 2025
Table 2	Decisions: January 2025
Table 3	Received: November 2024, February, April, May and June 2025
Table 3	Closed: January 2025
Table 3	Open: October, November, and December 2024 and January, February, March, May and June 2025
Table 5	Written Representations: January 2025
Table 5	Total decisions: January 2025
Table 6	Hearings Valid to decision (Median weeks): February 2025
Table 6	Hearings Valid to decision (Mean weeks): February and June 2025
Table 6	Inquiries Valid to decision (Mean weeks): June 2025
Table 6	Hearings Standard Deviation (weeks): December 2024 and June 2025
Table 9	Specialist: January and June 2025
Table 9	Total decisions: January 2025
Table 10	Specialist: Valid to decision (Median weeks): October 2024, January, February, March, May and June 2025
Table 10	Specialist: Valid to decision (Mean weeks): October and December 2024, January, February, March and June 2025
Table 10	Specialist: Standard deviation of decision (weeks): January and May 2025
Annex A Enforcement	Written Representations (Decisions): March, May and June 2025
Annex A Enforcement	Written Representations (Median weeks): March 2025
Annex A Enforcement	Hearings (Decisions): December 2024 and January 2025
Annex A Enforcement	Hearings (Median weeks): December 2024 and January 2025
Annex A Enforcement	Hearings (Mean weeks): December 2024
Annex A Enforcement	Inquiries (Decisions): June 2025
Annex A Enforcement	Inquiries (Median weeks): June 2025
Annex A Enforcement	Inquiries (Mean weeks): June 2025
Annex A Enforcement	Inquiries (Standard Deviation): June 2025
Annex A Specialist	Written Representations (Decisions): October and December 2024, January, February, March, April, May and June 2025
Annex A Specialist	Written Representations (Median weeks): January, February, May and June 2025
Annex A Specialist	Written Representations (Mean weeks): October and December 2024, January, February, March, April and June 2025
Annex A Specialist	Written Representations (Standard Deviation): May 2025
Annex A Specialist	Hearings (Decisions): January, February, May and June 2025
Annex A Specialist	Hearings (Median weeks): January, May and June 2025
Annex A Specialist	Hearings (Mean weeks): May and June 2025
Annex A Specialist	Hearings (Standard Deviation): January, May and June 2025

13. Annex F – New table order information

Previous Table Number	New Table number
Table 1 Number of events held, decisions issued and median time between valid date & decision date	Table 2: Number of events held, decisions issued and median time between valid date & decision date;
Table 2: Number of cases received, closed and open	Table 3: Number of cases received, closed and open
Table 3: Appeal Decisions	Removed due to repeating information
Table 4: Appeal Decisions by Procedure and Casework Category	Spilt into two tables:  Table 5: Appeal Decisions by Procedure, Table 9: Appeal Decisions by Casework Category
Table 5: Median, mean and Standard Deviation of Time to Decision	Table 1: Median, mean and Standard Deviation of Time to Decision
Table 6: Mean and Median Time to Decision, with Standard Deviation, by Procedure	Table 6: Mean and Median Time to Decision, with Standard Deviation, by Procedure
Table 7: Decisions, Mean, Median and Standard Deviation of Time to Decision – Planning, Enforcement, Specialist Cases;	Table 10: Decisions, Mean, Median and Standard Deviation of Time to Decision – Planning, Enforcement, Specialist Cases;
Table 8: Decisions, Mean and Median Time to Decision, Planning Inquiry Cases under Rosewell Process	Table 7: Decisions, Median and Mean Time to Decision, Planning Inquiry Cases under Rosewell Process
Table 9: Decisions, Planning Inquiry Cases under non-Rosewell Process	Table 8: Decisions, Planning Inquiry Cases under non-Rosewell Process;
Table 10: Open cases by procedure and stage	Table 4: Open cases by procedure and stage
Table 11: Planning Inspectors – Headcount and FTE	Table 11: Planning Inspectors – Headcount and FTE

14. Background notes

Data sources

Horizon / Picaso – The main casework management systems used for processing appeals casework (note that Picaso is no longer a live system).

Employee central – The Human Resources system database used to store all information regarding members of staff.

Compliance with the Code of Practice for Statistics

These statistics have been published in accordance with the Code of Practice for Statistics, which cover trustworthiness, quality, and value. They have been pre-announced, and publication is overseen by the Head of Profession.

Technical Notes

A Background Quality Report is published alongside this Statistical Release. It provides more detail on the quality of statistics in this publication.

Data quality

Data on cases is taken from a live casework system, and details of cases can change for a number of reasons even after a decision has been made. We are seeking to get a better understanding of the nature and volume of these changes and will provide further information as it is available. We carry out regular checks on the quality of our data and may undertake ad hoc data cleansing exercises.  Therefore, all the data for the last 12 rolling months is published in provisional form. We have indicated in this publication any data where a number of cases has changed by more than five cases in a month; or where a measure (mean, median or standard deviation) has changed by more than 0.5 weeks.

Measuring weeks

Data are measured in days and then converted to weeks.  Note that not all decimal values are possible where converting days to weeks. 1 day is 1/7 of a week, or 0.14 weeks (to two decimal places). 2 days = 0.29; 3 days = 0.43; 4 days = 0.57; 5 days = 0.71; 6 days = 0.86.   When these are used to calculate averages, or displayed to one decimal place, the result will not equate to a full day which can be misleading: it may appear that we are measuring part days (e.g. 19.8 weeks) but we only measure in whole days.

Glossary

Term	Explanation
Appeals	The right to appeal a planning decision made by a local authority is a key feature of the planning system, as is appealing when an authority is taking too long.
Appeals decided	Number of appeals by the date the appeal was decided by The Planning Inspectorate.
Appeals received	Number of appeals by the date the appeal was received by The Planning Inspectorate.
Applications	Planning Inspectorate manage the application process for proposed Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) within England and Wales in line with the 2008 Planning Act.
Closed	The total number of appeals decided, withdrawn, or turned away.
Decision	The outcome of the case e.g. appeal allowed or rejected. The date of the decision is taken as the date a decision letter is sent to the appellant.
Event	A site visit, hearing, or inquiry (may be virtual)
Event Type	The different options of how an Inspector visits a site for a written representations appeal.
Examinations	The process of examining local plans is dealt with by the Planning Inspectorate. Every Local Planning Authority is required to have a local plan.  This includes a vision for the future and plan to address housing needs in the area.  When a Local Planning Authority has finished preparing and consulting on a local plan it must be submitted to the Secretary of State who appoints an Inspector to carry out an independent examination.
FTE	Full Time Equivalent – a count of employees where those working part time are counted in proportion with their contracted hours.
Headcount	Total number of staff employed regardless of how many hours they work (i.e. the number of different individuals).
Hearings	A hearing involves the submission of written evidence by the main parties and a hearing once all the written submissions have been received.  This takes the form of a round-the-table discussion (in person or virtually) that will be led by the planning inspector. It allows for all parties to respond to any questions that the inspector might have, and to let everyone make their case known.   Source: Planning Portal
Inquiries	An inquiry is usually used for complex cases where legal issues may need to be considered. The main parties will usually have legal representatives to present their case and to cross-examine any witnesses. Prior to the inquiry date, the Planning Inspectorate will expect to have received various documents from all parties that will be taking part in the appeal. These may include statements of case and proofs of evidence from expert witnesses. Third parties may also take part. The inquiry will be led by the inspector and will follow a formal procedure. At some point during or on conclusion of the inquiry the inspector and the main parties will undertake a site visit.  Source: Planning Portal
Live appeals	Number of live appeals in that have an appeal valid date but no end date (either decision date or a closed date, e.g. for appeals that have been withdrawn).
Mean	The total time taken divided by the number of cases. Also referred to as the ‘average’. A measure of how long each case would take, if the total time taken was spread evenly across all cases.
Median	This is the time taken by the ‘middle’ case if all cases were sorted from quickest to longest
Open Cases	Number of cases that have been received but on which a decision has not yet been made/ issued. Will differ from Live Appeals as it includes those received but not yet verified.
Procedure Type	The method by which The Planning Inspectorate processes and decides appeals.
Standard deviation	This is a measure of variability or spread. It is calculated by examining how much each value differs from the mean. A higher standard deviation means the individual decision times vary more widely around the mean.
Written Representations (includes Rights of Way Schedule 14)	Most planning appeals are decided by the written representations’ procedure. With this procedure the Inspector considers written evidence from the appellant, the LPA and anyone else who has an interest in the appeal. The site is also likely to be visited.

15. Contact Us

The Planning Inspectorate welcome feedback on our statistical products. If you have any comments or questions about this publication or about our statistics in general, you can contact us as follows:

Media enquiries 0303 444 5004

email press.office@planninginspectorate.gov.uk

Public enquiries email statistics@planninginspectorate.gov.uk

Please note we are currently reviewing our statistics with a view to making them as clear and helpful as possible for users. We would be delighted if you could contact us via the address below with any views on this approach; particularly on what content would be most useful and why.

email statistics@planninginspectorate.gov.uk

If you require information which is not available within this or other available publications, you may wish to submit a Request for Information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to the Planning Inspectorate. For more information, see: https://www.gov.uk/make-a-freedom-of-information-request/the-freedom-of-information-act