Decision

Advice letter: Andrew Stephenson, Chair of the Health, Care, and Life Sciences Research Group Advisory Board, Curia UK

Updated 18 June 2025

1. BUSINESS APPOINTMENT APPLICATION: the Rt Hon Andrew Stephenson CBE, former Minister of State for Health and Secondary Care at the Department for Health and Social Care. Unpaid appointment with Curia UK. 

You approached the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (the Committee) under the government’s Business Appointment Rules for Former Ministers (the Rules) seeking advice on taking up an unpaid role as Chair of the Health, Care, and Life Sciences Research Group Advisory Board at Curia UK (Curia).

The purpose of the Rules is to protect the integrity of the government. The Committee has considered the risks associated with the actions and decisions made during your time in office, alongside the information and influence you may offer Curia. The material information taken into consideration by the Committee is set out in the annex below.

The Committee’s advice is not an endorsement of the appointment – it imposes a number of conditions to mitigate the potential risks to the government associated with the appointment under the Rules.

The Ministerial Code sets out that ministers must abide by the Committee’s advice. It is an applicant’s personal responsibility to manage the propriety of any appointment. Former ministers of the Crown, and Members of Parliament, are expected to uphold the highest standards of propriety and act in accordance with the 7 Principles of Public Life.

2. The Committee’s consideration of the risks presented

When considering this application, the Committee^{[footnote 1]} took into account that this appointment as Chair of the Health, Care, and Life Sciences Research Group Advisory Board at Curia is unpaid^{[footnote 2]}. Generally, the Committee’s experience is that the risks related to unpaid roles are limited. The purpose of the Rules is to protect the integrity of government by considering the real and perceived risks associated with former ministers joining outside organisations. Those risks include: using privileged access to contacts and information to the benefit of themselves or those they represent. The Rules also seek to mitigate the risks that individuals may make decisions, or take action in office, in expectation of rewards on leaving government. These risks are significantly limited in unpaid cases due to the lack of financial gain to the individual.

There is a general overlap with your time in office as Minister of State for Health and Secondary Care and certain areas of Curia’s work - particularly in life sciences. Therefore, some of your responsibilities may have overlapped  and you would have had access to privileged information; though the relevance of such information is likely to be limited given the ten months that have passed since you left office and the subsequent changes in government. There remain inherent risks associated with any former minister’s access to information, network of contacts and influence in government. In this unpaid role, these risks are limited.

3. The Committee’s advice

The Committee did not consider this unpaid appointment to raise any particular concerns under the government’s Business Appointment Rules. The standard conditions below sufficiently mitigate the inherent risks. These seek to prevent you from making improper use of privileged information, contacts and influence to the unfair advantage of the organisation.

In accordance with the government’s Business Appointment Rules, the Committee advises this appointment with Curia UK be subject to the following conditions:

• you should not draw on (disclose or use for the benefit of yourself or the persons or organisations to which this advice refers) any privileged information available to you from your time in ministerial office;

• for two years from your last day in ministerial office, you should not become personally involved in lobbying the UK government or its arm’s length bodies on behalf of Curia UK (including parent companies, subsidiaries, partners and clients); nor should you make use, directly or indirectly, of your contacts in the government and/or Crown service to influence policy, secure business/funding or otherwise unfairly advantage Curia UK (including parent companies, subsidiaries, partners and clients); and

• for two years from your last day in ministerial office you should not undertake any work with Curia UK (including parent companies, subsidiaries, partners and clients) that involves providing advice on the terms of, or with regard to the subject matter of a bid with, or contract relating directly to the work of, the UK government or its arm’s length bodies.

The advice and the conditions under the government’s Business Appointment Rules relate to your previous role in government only; they are separate from rules administered by other bodies such as the Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and the Registrar of Lords’ Interests^{[footnote 3]}. It is an applicant’s personal responsibility to understand any other rules and regulations they may be subject to in parallel with this Committee’s advice.

By ‘privileged information’ we mean official information to which a minister or Crown servant has had access as a consequence of his or her office or employment and which has not been made publicly available. Applicants are also reminded that they may be subject to other duties of confidentiality, whether under the Official Secrets Act, the Ministerial Code or otherwise.

The Business Appointment Rules explain that the restriction on lobbying means that you ‘should not engage in communication with government (ministers, civil servants, including special advisers, and other relevant officials/public office holders) – wherever it takes place – with a view to influencing a government decision, policy or contract award/grant in relation to their own interests or the interests of the organisation by which they are employed, or to whom they are contracted or with which they hold office’.

You must inform us as soon as you take up employment with this organisation, or if it is announced that you will do so and we will publish this letter on our website. You must inform us if you propose to extend or otherwise change the nature of your role as, depending on the circumstances, it may be necessary for you to make a fresh application.

4. Annex – Material Information

4.1 The role

According to its website, Curia UK (Curia) is an independent, not-for-profit policy institute dedicated to transforming policy into practice. Its work spans across health, care, and life sciences, driving innovation and actionable change to improve lives. Curia engages with governments, clinicians, industry leaders, and researchers to address challenges in healthcare policy and delivery. Members of the advisory board include former chief executives and senior executives with experience in the UK healthcare system. Its parent company is Chamber UK, which publishes and broadcasts political insights and analyses from around the UK.

You noted that as a not-for-profit policy institute, Curia engages with governments, clinicians, industry leaders, and researchers to address challenges in healthcare policy and delivery. However, importantly, you also noted that it does not lobby the government.

You wish to take up a part-time, unpaid role as Chair of the Health, Care, and Life Sciences Research Group Advisory Board at Curia. You said your responsibilities will include:

• providing strategic oversight, guidance, and thought leadership to ensure Curia’s work remains impactful and aligned with the needs of the UK healthcare system and its global connections;

• leading the Advisory Board, fostering collaboration and ensuring a strategic focus on policy-to-practice initiatives;

• shaping the group’s research agenda, driving impactful outputs in health, care, and life sciences;

• acting as a key ambassador for Curia, enhancing the organisation’s profile across healthcare and policy networks;

• providing high-level advice on emerging healthcare challenges and opportunities;

• leveraging your expertise and network to attract partnerships and funding opportunities for the group’s projects;

• supporting the development of internal events, ensuring alignment with strategic priorities, and act as a key representative of the Advisory Board at internal events;

• assisting with external parts of the role, which include chairing meetings, speaking at launch events and occasional media appearances representing Curia UK.

4.2 Dealings in office

You said that you did not make any policy, regulatory or commercial decisions specific to Curia, and that you did not have any access to information that could grant the organisation an unfair advantage. You also stated that there was no relationship between Curia and DHSC.

4.3 Departmental Assessment

DHSC confirmed the details you provided in your application.

DHSC recommended the standard conditions, noting the need for the conditions which prevent lobbying the UK government and working on bids and contracts with the government to include the NHS. The conditions, as set out in the advice letter above in paragraph 8, apply to the UK government and its arm’s length bodies, which include the NHS.

1. This application for advice was considered by Isabel Doverty; Hedley Finn OBE; Sarah de Gay; Michael Prescott; and The Baroness Thornton. Dawid Konotey-Ahulu CBE was unavailable.  ↩

2. By unpaid the Committee means that no remuneration of any kind is received for the role. Applicants must declare where it is agreed or anticipated they may receive remuneration or some other compensation at some stage in the future. ↩

3. All Peers and Members of Parliament are prevented from paid lobbying under the House of Commons Code of Conduct and the Code of Conduct for Members of the House of Lords. Advice on obligations under the Code can be sought from the Parliamentary Commissioners for Standards, in the case of MPs, or the Registrar of Lords’ Interests, in the case of peers. ↩