Quota application mechanism (QAM) pilot 2024 assessment
Published 21 August 2025
Applies to England
Executive summary
The quota application mechanism (QAM) pilot 2024 represents a significant evolution in England’s approach to sustainable fisheries management. This report assesses the performance of 2 quota recipients under the pilot, focusing on the environmental, social, and economic impacts of their operations. The findings indicate that both recipients have demonstrated commendable innovation and responsibility, aligning with the UK’s broader objectives for sustainable fisheries, community development, and economic resilience.
1. Environmental impact assessment
The environmental contributions of the QAM pilot participants were substantial and multifaceted, reflecting a strong commitment to sustainable fishing practices and marine conservation.
1.1 Gear selectivity and bycatch reduction
Both recipients employed selective mesh panels, Dyneema netting, and nets fitted with separators and escape panels, which have been shown to reduce bycatch and improve target species selectivity. These measures are important in minimising catches of more vulnerable stocks. The use of bird scaring lines, weighted lines, and gear deployment in low light conditions demonstrates a proactive approach to reducing seabird bycatch. Additionally, electronic pingers and magnet deterrents trialled under the CIBRiNNA project show innovation in mitigating marine mammal and shark interactions.
1.2 Technological integration
Advanced technologies such as ground discrimination multibeam echosounders, drop-down cameras, transducers on nets, and latest sonar systems were employed to enhance fishing precision and reduce habitat impact. These tools enable skippers to make informed decisions, avoiding sensitive benthic habitats and reduce unnecessary gear deployment.
The use of mid-water pelagic trawls and short tows further minimises seabed contact, aligning with best practices for habitat protection.
1.3 Monitoring and research collaboration
Participation in the Fisheries Industry Science Partnerships (FISP) self-sampling project, the Clean Catch app, early adoption of the UK government remote electronic monitoring (REM) trial, and collaboration with scientists to address endangered, threatened and protected (ETP) species bycatch underscore a strong culture of transparency and continuous improvement.
Efforts to quantify and benchmark gear contact and explore Active Selection (ActSel) systems are also being made by a participant, reflecting a forward-looking approach to gear innovation and impact reduction.
2. Social and economic impact assessment
The QAM recipients have made notable contributions to social sustainability, particularly in terms of employment, training, and community engagement.
2.1 Employment and local recruitment
Applicants who supported local employment were more likely to receive quota through the QAM pilot, creating an incentive to reduce reliance on migrant labour.
Applicants who were awarded quota have access to additional fishing opportunities had they not applied to the pilot, providing greater employment prospects and job certainty for their crew.
2.2 Training and career development
Participants invested in workforce development through training trust funds, cadet sponsorships, and onboard safety committees. These initiatives not only enhance safety and operational standards but also provide clear career pathways for new entrants, including factory and deck hands and engineering officer cadets.
2.3 Group engagement
Engagement in community promotional events, MSC certification groups, and the development of a data sharing agreement with Cefas highlight a commitment to transparency, stakeholder collaboration, and public trust.
2.4 Economic output and local investment
The 2 quota recipients had a combined landings value of approximately £960,000 from the stocks allocated through QAM. The operational models employed (utilising local ports, berthing and pilotage services, road haulage, cold storage, and customs agents) encourages economic benefits of this landings value to be retained within the UK. The models support a wide range of ancillary services, from medical providers to taxi companies, reinforcing the role of fisheries as economic anchors in coastal communities.
2.5 Market stability and value retention
By catching the full range of sizes and retaining all catches, the recipients contribute to fully documented fisheries and reduced waste. Fish below minimum legal size or damaged are offered to inshore fishermen as bait (after a sales note has been generated), supporting circular economy principles.
The presence of UK-based processing businesses linked to one of the recipients further enhances value retention and supports domestic food supply chains, including fishmongers and food service providers.
2.6 Export and regional development
Export activity in local regions can demonstrate an area’s viability as a seafood export hub. For instance, one recipient reported expenditure of £1.36 million over a 2 year period, including costs associated with the export of goods. Therefore, quota caught through QAM can have wider economic influences than just the local economy, aligning with the government’s growth plan and supporting the UK’s post-Brexit trade ambitions.
Conclusion and recommendations
The QAM pilot 2024 has delivered demonstrable environmental, social, and economic benefits through its 2 quota recipients. Their operations reflect a high standard of sustainability, innovation, and community integration. Key strengths include:
- improved gear selectivity and bycatch mitigation
- strong partnerships with scientific and regulatory bodies
- local employment and training initiatives
- economic contributions to coastal businesses
Recommendations and feedback from stakeholders for future QAM developments include:
- supporting the scale-up of REM, catch accounting and self-sampling initiatives to enhance data quality and compliance
- expanding the tonnage available and variety of stocks involved to encourage wider participation
- incentivise broader adoption of gear innovations and modifications
- include non-sectoral and Crown Dependency fishers into the scheme
Overall, the QAM pilot proved to be a valuable test for aligning quota allocation with sustainability and community benefit objectives. Continued refinement and expansion of this model could play a pivotal role in shaping the future of UK fisheries. With expansion of QAM policy, more in-depth evaluation of policy processes and impacts will be considered.
Disclaimer
The figures within the assessment above refer to benefits or outputs as a result of trial participants receiving QAM quota. These may differ to the statements or figures in the table below which may refer to the applicant’s outputs on a wider scale.
Benefits and statements listed by participants in the QAM pilot 2024
Environmental statements listed in the applications
Statements | Evidence |
---|---|
Use of trawl/pair seine vessels with selective mesh panels | Photographic evidence |
Catch monitoring systems | Photographic evidence |
Dyneema netting | Internal invoice |
5/6 bladed multi propulsion propellers | Photographic evidence |
Ground discrimination multibeam echosounders | Photographic evidence |
Shorter trips | E-log data |
Work with partners on quantifying and benchmarking trawl and pair seine gear contact | A presentation |
Participation in a FISP self-sampling project | A presentation |
Gillnetters/liners with smaller engines per unit tonnage | An internal spreadsheet |
Bird scare weighted lines, gear deployment in low light conditions and dim lighting | A presentation and written evidence |
Offal management | A presentation |
Vertical net retrieving | Written evidence |
Electronic pingers | Photographic evidence |
Trialling of magnets as deterrent mitigation under the CIBRiNNA project | A signed confirmation letter |
Work with scientists to address ETP bycatch, the application of mitigation measures, and improve fishing effort estimations from VMS/AIS data | A signed confirmation letter |
Use mid water pelagic trawls that do not introduce risk to benthic habitats | Video evidence |
Latest echo sounder and sonar technology to compliment Skipper’s knowledge | Photographic evidence |
Drop down cameras used before shooting gear | Photographic evidence |
Nets fitted with separators and escape panels | Documentation and written evidence |
Scoping options to develop a version of the Active Selection (ActSel) system | A presentation, video and written evidence |
Acoustic deterrent devices and electromagnetic devices to deter shark species | Photographic evidence and internal invoices |
Short tows | Elog data |
Transducers on the net | Photographic evidence and written evidence |
Retaining and land all catches | Video evidence |
Early adopter of the UK government REM trial | Email correspondence |
Social statements listed in the applications
Statements | Evidence |
---|---|
Landing into the UK | eLogbook landing data |
Linked fish processing business being based in the UK | Companies House information |
Job security through reduced costs through leasing in fish (more attractive to recruiting local crew) | Fish Leasing form |
Training trust fund | An internal invoice |
Community promotional events | Video evidence |
Participation groups, such as Clean Catch, MSC certification, etc. | An internal presentation, communications and group member lists |
Majority of crew sourced from the Humber region | Economic link data |
Formal contracts and our T&Cs are fully compliant with ILO C188 | Compliance documentation |
Company Safety Officer | Internal documentation and written evidence |
Formal safety management committees to ship’s officers | Meeting minutes |
Convene onboard safety committees | Meeting minutes |
Recruit and train new entrants as factory and deck hands | Employment evidence |
Recruit Deck and Engineering officer cadets and sponsor them through training to Foundation Degree level | Signed confirmation letter and internal spreadsheets |
Led the development of a data sharing agreement between the PFA and Cefas | Internal communications |
Economic statements listed in the applications
Statements | Evidence |
---|---|
Employment effect of 7.9 FTE at sea and 20.7 FTE onshore | Calculation set out within the application’s text |
£2.17 million overall economic output | Calculation set out within the application’s text |
Employment effect of 0.5 FTE at sea and 1.3 FTE onshore | Calculation set out within the application’s text |
£140,596 overall economic output | Calculation set out within the application’s text |
UK-based linked processing businesses, which also supply food service and fish mongers | Sales and purchase notes |
Saved lease costs | Fish Leasing form |
Catching the full range of sizes (helps to stabilise the market) | Written evidence |
Land fish into Grimsby | Landing data |
An operational model using local ports, berthing and pilotage services, shipping agents, stevedores, road haulage and cold storage companies | Internal invoices and written evidence |
Engaged customs agents, Port Health Authority officials, ship’s chandlers, medical services and taxi companies as required to support our operations | Internal invoices |
Contributed £1.36 million to the local economy | Internal spreadsheet |
Export activity demonstrates the viability of the Humber region as an export hub, supporting existing employment and create the potential for future job opportunities in the area | Export load records |
Catch and produce fish for human consumption only | Written evidence |
Land all that we catch | Video evidence |
Offer fish below minimum size or damaged to English inshore fishermen to use as bait for their fishing operations | Email correspondence |