Research and analysis

Safety flyer to the fishing industry – Apache/Serinah

Published 5 February 2026

1. Summary

Collision between the crude oil tanker Apache and the stern trawler Serinah (GH 116) in the Firth of Clyde, Scotland on 25 April 2024.

Image of Apache courtesy of Nereus Shipping S.A. Image of Serinah courtesy of Iain Cameron (SmugMug).

2. Narrative

On 25 April 2024, the 274m crude oil tanker Apache and the 9.9m stern trawler Serinah collided in the Firth of Clyde off the west coast of Scotland. Serinah was making circular clockwise tows while fishing a seabed depression and Apache was making preparations to board a pilot after a sea passage from Nigeria.

Serinah was visible on Apache’s radar and visibility was good, yet a collision occurred because the watchkeepers on both vessels had not appreciated the developing risk in time to take effective avoiding action.

The watchkeepers on Apache were used to small fishing vessels manoeuvring clear at the last minute, despite recognising that the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (IRPCS, also referred to as the COLREGs) required Apache to take action to avoid a collision as the give-way vessel. The crew member on watch on Serinah had not completed any formal navigation training.

Serinah was struck by the bow of Apache and sank rapidly. All three crew members ended up in the water, two of whom were able to quickly board the vessel’s liferaft. The skipper was rescued after approximately 15 minutes. There were no injuries.

The actions taken on both vessels did not reflect an understanding of the IRPCS, particularly the requirements set out in Rule 7 (Risk of Collision) and Rule 18 (Responsibilities Between Vessels).

3. Safety lessons

  1. The IRPCS provides a framework for safe navigation, but these rules are only effective if they are followed. There was plenty of unobstructed space at sea for early action to be taken to avoid this accident. The tanker initially held the responsibility to alter course but both vessels were ultimately responsible for taking action to prevent a collision.

  2. Too often, those holding a navigational watch at sea on smaller fishing vessels have received limited, if any, formal navigation or IRPCS training. This investigation resulted in a recommendation to the Maritime and Coastguard Agency to introduce a navigational training requirement for fishermen who stand a navigational watch on board commercial vessels between 7m and 16.5m. Fishing vessel operators should ensure all watchkeepers on their vessels are trained and have a good working knowledge of the IRPCS.

  3. Marine Guidance Note 313 (F) – Keeping a Safe Navigational Watch on Fishing Vessels contains advice based on lessons learned from previous accidents, and all skippers should be aware of its content.

4. Further information

Extract from The United Kingdom Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012 – Regulation 5: 

The sole objective of the investigation of an accident under the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012 shall be the prevention of future accidents through the ascertainment of its causes and circumstances. It shall not be the purpose of an such investigation to determine liability nor, except so far as is necessary to achieve its objective, to apportion blame. 

Note: 

This safety flyer is not written with litigation in mind and, pursuant to Regulation 14(14) of the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012, shall be inadmissible in any judicial proceedings whose purpose, or one of whose purposes is to attribute or apportion liability or blame.  

Marine Accident Investigation Branch

First Floor, Spring Place
105 Commercial Road
Southampton
SO15 1GH

Email iso@maib.gov.uk

Enquiries during office hours +44 (0)23 8039 5500