If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a
version of this document in a more accessible format, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
This research looked at four different potential processes for enquiries about results
(EAR) for examined work:
The current review process – in which examiners review the original marking
of the script and should change the mark only where the original mark cannot
be justified. (condition 1)
A review plus tolerance process – in which examiners review the original
marking as above. A ‘tolerance’ is applied such that any second mark within
tolerance (say, plus or minus 3 marks) of the original mark is discarded and the original mark
retained. This would be to prevent one legitimate mark being replaced by
another legitimate mark. (condition 2)
A single clean re-mark – where examiners mark the script with no sight of the
original marking or annotations. This is sometimes called a blind re-mark.
A double clean re-mark with resolution – where two examiners
independently mark a script. Where their marks differ, they come to a joint
decision on the most appropriate mark. (condition 4)