Research and analysis

Alternative marking review processes for exams

Research by Ofqual on alternative review processes for GCSE, AS and A level exam results.

Documents

Research into alternative marking review processes for exams

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

This research looked at four different potential processes for enquiries about results (EAR) for examined work:

  1. The current review process – in which examiners review the original marking of the script and should change the mark only where the original mark cannot be justified. (condition 1)
  2. A review plus tolerance process – in which examiners review the original marking as above. A ‘tolerance’ is applied such that any second mark within tolerance (say, plus or minus 3 marks) of the original mark is discarded and the original mark retained. This would be to prevent one legitimate mark being replaced by another legitimate mark. (condition 2)
  3. A single clean re-mark – where examiners mark the script with no sight of the original marking or annotations. This is sometimes called a blind re-mark. (condition 3)
  4. A double clean re-mark with resolution – where two examiners independently mark a script. Where their marks differ, they come to a joint decision on the most appropriate mark. (condition 4)
Published 10 December 2015