© Crown copyright 2015
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-health-and-safety-reform/2010-to-2015-government-policy-health-and-safety-reform
This is a copy of a document that stated a policy of the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. The previous URL of this page was https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/improving-the-health-and-safety-system. Current policies can be found at the GOV.UK policies list.
We believe that good health and safety is important, but the burden of excessive health and safety rules and regulations on business had become too great and a damaging compensation culture was stifling innovation and growth. We want to protect people in the workplace while reducing the burden of unnecessary health and safety rules and regulations on businesses.
Reviews by Lord Young and Professor Löfstedt found that too often businesses felt they must go beyond what health and safety law required. The issues identified were:
- there were too many inspections of relatively low risk and well performing workplaces
- an overly complex structure for regulation
- businesses too often received poor health and safety advice from badly qualified consultants
- a ‘compensation culture’ lead businesses to a fear of being sued for accidents, even where they were not at fault
Concentrating health and safety enforcement on higher risk areas
Our aim is to take a lighter touch approach to health and safety at work, concentrating efforts on higher risk industries and serious breaches of the rules. This leaves those organisations which pose a lesser risk, and which do the right thing for their employees, free of unwarranted scrutiny. This will mean a substantial drop in the number of health and safety inspections carried out in Britain:
- a National Local Authority Enforcement Code sets out the risk based approach to targeting health and safety interventions that local authority regulators should follow
- the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has reduced the number of proactive inspections it does each year by a third, from around 33,000 to 22,000
- the Better Regulations Delivery Office has strengthened the primary authority scheme so it is accessible to more small businesses, covers more regulations and has strengthened inspection plans
Simplifying health and safety law and guidance
Since 2010 a number of changes have been made to ease the burden on business:
- HSE have published Health and Safety Made Simple to help small and medium-sized businesses achieve a basic level of health and safety management in their workplace
- HSE has reduced the overall stock of health and safety legislation by 50%, so that there is now a simpler, modern set of legislation
- HSE have clarified and simplified the accident and ill health reporting requirements for businesses, supported by new straightforward, web-based guidance
- HSE have removed the restriction on using only HSE-approved first aid training courses, and issued new straightforward guidance
Setting up the Occupational Safety and Health Consultants Register
We have made it easier for businesses to find competent and ethical consultants. The official register of Occupational Safety and Health Consultants set up in January 2011 is for health and safety practitioners who are properly accredited to one of the professional bodies in the industry. This offers businesses a free, easily accessible way of finding sensible and proportionate competent health and safety advice for their business. This helps bring to an end the rogue health and safety advisers who increase the burden on business and cost industry money by giving advice which bears little relation to the legal requirements.
Removing the fear of being sued
Our aim is to remove the fear of being sued that leads employers to go beyond what the law requires. This undermines their confidence to grow and develop their businesses and means they incur unnecessary costs.
We introduced new rules so that civil claims for compensation for people injured at work can only be brought in cases where the employer has been negligent (previously an employer could be liable even where they had taken all sensible steps to prevent injury).
HSE has published new work experience guidance that makes clear that taking on work experience students should not involve lots of paperwork.
HSE’s Myth Busters Challenge Panel has challenged over 200 cases where health and safety has been misrepresented.
The Ministry of Justice has implemented a number of reforms to reduce the costs of litigation to claimants and businesses, to discourage dishonest or fraudulent, exaggerated claims and to ban inducements by legal services providers in personal injury claims.
Health and safety reform reports
We have now published a final progress report on the implementation of health and safety reforms. The final report, along with the earlier progress reports, provide information on how the government has implemented Lord Young’s and Professor Löfstedt’s recommendations.
Review of health and safety laws by Lord Young (‘Common Sense Common Safety’)
Lord Young undertook a review across government of health and safety laws and the growth of the compensation culture. His report ‘Common sense, common safety’ was published in October 2010.
Plans for further health and safety reform (‘Good Health and Safety, Good for Everyone’)
On 21 March 2011 we published plans for further reform in ‘Good health and safety, good for everyone’.
Professor Löfstedt’s review of health and safety law (‘Reclaiming health and safety for all’)
Professor Ragnar Löfstedt, leading risk management specialist, carried out a review of health and safety law. Comments received from the government’s Red Tape Challenge health and safety theme were provided to him. On 28 November 2011, his review ‘Reclaiming health and safety for all’ and the government response to the review were published.
Who we’ve consulted with
Professor Löfstedt and the advisory panel asked a wide range of interested parties to provide evidence and examples to help inform the review of health and safety law. The call for evidence closed on 29 July 2011. All evidence submitted was considered by Professor Löfstedt’s review.