The Cabinet Office is committed to providing a high-quality service to everyone we deal with. In order to do this we need you to give us any comments about our service, and to tell us when we get things wrong. We want to help you resolve your complaint as quickly as possible.
We treat as a complaint any expression of dissatisfaction with our service which calls for a response. We listen to your complaints, treat them seriously, and learn from them so that we can continuously improve our service.
A complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction, whether justified or not.
Our policy covers complaints about:
- the standard of service we provide
- the behaviour of our staff
- any action or lack of action by staff affecting an individual or group
Our complaints policy does not cover:
- matters that have already been fully investigated through this complaints procedure
- anonymous complaints
- complaints about access to information where procedures and remedies are set out in legislation, eg Freedom of Information Act, Data Protection Act
Persistent and or vexatious complaints
These are becoming an increasing problem for all departments and public sector bodies, and difficulties in handling such complaints can place strain on time and resources and can be stressful for staff who have to deal with these complex and challenging issues. In order to counter this, we will introduce a policy that deals with persistent or vexatious complaints.
Our standards for handling complaints
- we treat all complaints seriously, whether they are made by letter or by email
- you will be treated with courtesy and fairness at all times - we would hope, too, that you will be courteous and fair in your dealings with our staff at all times
- we will treat your complaint in confidence within the department
- we will deal with your complaint promptly - we will acknowledge receipt of a written complaint within 5 working days and we will send you a full reply within 20 working days of receipt
- if we cannot send a full reply within 20 working days of receipt we will tell you the reason why and let you know when we will be able to reply in full
- we will publish information in our annual report on the numbers and categories of complaints we receive, and the percentage of complaints upheld.
All complaints received will be dealt with confidentially and in accordance with the requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998.
How to complain
You can make a complaint by email or post.
You can send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org or in writing to Public Correspondence Team, Cabinet Office, 70 Whitehall, London SWA 2AS.
We have a 2-stage complaints procedure. At each stage it will help us to resolve your complaint quickly if you can give us as much clear detail as possible, including any documents and correspondence and stating that you are making a complaint in line with our procedure.
The stages of the complaints procedure
This is the first opportunity for the department to resolve a complainant’s dissatisfaction, and the majority of complaints will be resolved at this stage. In the first instance, we will try to get your complaint resolved by the Head or Director of the area or team against whom the complaint has been made. Upon receipt of your complaint we will contact the relevant team Head or Director and ask them to deal with your complaint.
If you are dissatisfied with this response you may request a review by the director of the relevant team or unit. Your request should be sent to the help desk at the address given below, who will forward your request to the director of the relevant team or unit for a review.
At each stage, please send your complaint or request for review to the help desk.
Timescales for handling a complaint
Stage 1 - maximum 20 working days
- acknowledgement within 5 working days
- full response within 20 working days
Stage 2 - maximum 20 working days
- acknowledgement within 5 working days
- full response within 20 working days
Extending time limits
We aim to complete all complaints within the timescales above; however, if a complaint is very complex it may occasionally be necessary to extend the time limit. If this is the case, we will keep the complainant informed of progress with the investigation, the reasons for the delay, and the new deadline.
Following any stage of the procedure, a complainant has a maximum of 28 days from the date of the final response to request that their complaint be progressed to the next stage.
If you remain dissatisfied
If having followed the 2 stages of our complaints procedure you still remain dissatisfied, you can ask to have your complaint reviewed externally by someone who does not work for the Cabinet Office.
You should contact your Member of Parliament and ask for your complaint to be referred to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. The Ombudsman can carry out independent investigations into complaints about government departments, agencies and some public bodies, including the Cabinet Office.
The Cabinet Office provides the government’s central link with the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
The Parliamentary Ombudsman (also known as the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration) investigates complaints that injustice has been caused by maladministration on the part of UK government departments or other public bodies.
The Parliamentary Ombudsman is an officer of the House of Commons (appointed by the Crown) and is independent of the government. Powers and responsibilities are set out in the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967.
The present Parliamentary Ombudsman, Rob Behrens, also holds the separate post of Health Service Commissioner for England, looking into complaints against the NHS.
Complaints about appropriate Scottish and Welsh bodies are the responsibility of the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman and the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales.
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
Complaints helpline: 0345 015 4033
Textphone (Minicom): 0300 061 4298
You can write to your MP at:
House of Commons
When we get things wrong we will act to:
- accept responsibility
- explain what went wrong and why
- put things right by making any changes required
The action we take to put matters right (ie redress) in response to a complaint, can include any combination of the remedies set out in the list below. The general principle we follow is that a complainant should, so far as possible, be put in the position he or she would have been in, had things not gone wrong.
The remedy chosen needs to be proportionate and appropriate to the failure in service, and take into account what people are looking for when they complain. An apology is normally appropriate, but other action may also be necessary:
- a sincere and meaningful apology (explaining what happened and or what went wrong) - an apology is not an acceptance of liability under Section 2 of the Compensation Act 2006
- remedial action, which may include reviewing or changing a decision on the service given to an individual complainant
- service desired by complainant (immediately, if appropriate)
- putting things right (for example change of procedures to prevent future difficulties of a similar kind, either for the complainant or others)
- training or supervising staff
- financial compensation
In the majority of cases, remedies other than financial compensation will satisfy the complainant. Financial compensation is therefore a final option, and will only apply in cases where the loss or suffering is considered to warrant such a payment.
In circumstances where it is decided that our action or lack of action has resulted in maladministration, if the complainant has suffered direct or indirect financial loss, compensation maybe payable. In determining this we will have regard to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PSHO) published ‘Principles for remedy’.
Where it is decided following investigation of a complaint, that a complainant has suffered an injustice and or hardship resulting in direct or indirect financial loss, due to maladministration, we will determine whether compensation is an appropriate remedy by looking at all the evidence, including how much the complainant can demonstrate they have lost, or what extra costs they have incurred as a result of our maladministration.
The reason for our decision will be recorded by the decision maker and included in our response.
Quality of service is an important measure of the effectiveness of departments and public bodies. Therefore learning from complaints is a good way of helping to improve and develop the way that the Cabinet Office work. As well as learning from your complaints we are also interested in other ideas you may have on how we might do things better.
You can make your comments by emailing or writing to us. We will use your comments to help improve our service and the way we do things. However, the 2-stage procedure outlined above does not apply to comments.
All complaints will be processed in accordance with this policy. However, during this process, staff may have contact with unreasonable complainant behaviour and unreasonably persistent complainants.
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman defines unreasonably persistent complainants as:
Those who, because of the frequency or nature of their contact with an authority, hinder the authority’s consideration of their or other people’s, complaints.
We will log all complaints we receive so that we can monitor the types of problems, the best way to sort them out and how long we are taking to deal with them. This also helps us to take a closer look at how we can improve our own service delivery.
We will handle your information in line with data protection legislation.