A surge of investment in new energy sources will be needed to ensure our energy security and reduce reliance on fossil fuels in the decades ahead, The Rt Hon Chris Huhne MP said today.
The Government has launched the consultation on the coalition’s revised draft national policy statements on energy. They show that we expect over half the new energy generating capacity built in the UK by 2025 to come from renewable sources. A significant proportion of the remainder will come from low carbon sources such as nuclear and fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage.
The statements confirmed eight sites as potentially suitable for new nuclear power stations and ruled out three sites for the development of new nuclear power by 2025. This came alongside the publication of the feasibility study into a tidal energy project in the Severn estuary.
As part of a package of announcements to provide certainty across the nuclear industry, the Secretary of State also:
- announced the Regulatory Justification of two new nuclear reactor designs - Westinghouse’s AP1000 and Areva’s EPR;
- set out more detail on what will be required from new nuclear developers in terms of clean-up; and
- provided further detail on the Government’s policy of no subsidy for new nuclear power.
The Rt Hon Chris Huhne MP, Secretary of State for Energy said:
“I’m fed up with the stand-off between advocates of renewables and of nuclear which means we have neither. We urgently need investment in new and diverse energy sources to power the UK. We’ll need renewables, new nuclear, fossil fuels with CCS, and the cables to hook them all up to the Grid as a large slice of our current generating capacity shuts down. The market needs certainty to make this investment happen, and we are determined to clear every obstacle in the way of this programme.
“So today we are setting out our energy need which will help guide the planning process, so that if sound proposals come forward in sensible places, they will not face unnecessary hold-ups. And I am making clear that new nuclear will be free to contribute as much as possible with the onus on developers to pay for the clean-up”.
The Severn study - published today - found that there was no strategic case for major public sector investment in a large-scale energy project in the Severn estuary at this time. It would be very costly to deliver and very challenging to attract the necessary investment from the private sector alone.
The Severn Tidal Power feasibility study showed that a tidal power scheme in the Estuary could cost in excess of £30bn, making it high cost and high risk in comparison to other ways of generating electricity. The report did recommend that a Severn tidal project should not be ruled out as a longer term option if market conditions change, but noted significant uncertainty over complying with regulation and that a scheme would fundamentally change the natural environment of the estuary.
Commenting on the Severn study, The Rt Hon Chris Huhne MP added:
“The study clearly shows that there is no strategic case at this time for public funding of a scheme to generate energy in the Severn estuary. Other low carbon options represent a better deal for taxpayers and consumers.
“However, with a rich natural marine energy resource, world leading tidal energy companies and universities, and the creation of the innovative Wave Hub facility, the area can play a key role in supporting the UK’s renewable energy future.”
Notes for editors:
- The Parliamentary statement is attached.
- The consultation on the NPSs closed on 24th January 2010.
- The revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement has found the following sites potentially suitable for the deployment of new nuclear power stations by 2025:
- Bradwell, Essex; Hartlepool, Borough of Hartlepool; Heysham, Lancashire; Hinkley Point, Somerset; Oldbury, South Glos.; Sellafield, Cumbria; Sizewell, Suffolk; Wylfa, Isle of Anglesey.
- The Government Response to Consultation on the draft Energy NPSs, published alongside the new NPSs, confirms that the Government has found that Dungeness in Kent is not suitable for deployment by 2025, due to concerns over the impact of a potential station on important habitat sites. It also sets out that Braystones and Kirksanton in Cumbria have been found to be not suitable for the deployment of new nuclear power stations by 2025, due to concerns over whether they were credible for deployment by 2025 and the potential impact that they could have on the Lake District National Park.
- The Secretary of State has published decisions that the nuclear power station designs currently known as the AP1000 and the EPR are Justified under the Justification of Practices Involving Ionising Radiation Regulations 2004 (the Regulations). These implement European Council Directive 96 / 29 / Euratom of 13 May 1996 (the Basic Safety Standards Directive) and provide that before any new practice involving ionising radiation (such as new nuclear power stations) can be introduced.
- This process is known as Regulatory Justification which is a high high-level, generic assessment to determine whether its economic, social or other benefits outweigh the health detriment it may cause. Further information is available on the Regulatory Justification page.
- The Severn Tidal Power study is available on the Severn Tidal Power page of this site.