Dealing with dismissal and compensated no fault dismissal for micro businesses: call for evidence
This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government
This consultation has concluded
Download the full outcome
Detail of outcome
The government response analyses public responses on the no fault dismissal (NFD) proposal and the Acas code of discipline and grievance. It explains where we need to make changes.
This consultation ran from
Seeks evidence on current dismissal processes, including the Acas Code of Practice and 'compensated no fault dismissal' for micro businesses
Ref: BIS/12/626 PDF, 349KB, 46 pages
Dealing with dismissal and 'compensated no fault dismissal' for micro businesses: international case studies
Ref: BIS/12/771 PDF, 355KB, 57 pages
The government is looking at any areas of current laws and regulations that can discourage responsible employers from hiring new staff.
We want to gather evidence about how the current dismissal system operates, including awareness, use and understanding of the Acas Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance. In particular, we want to understand whether the code could be changed to make it easier to use and more accessible to smaller businesses.
We are also seeking evidence on whether to introduce a system of ‘compensated no fault dismissal’ for micro businesses (ie businesses employing fewer than 10 staff) and what the consequences could be, including the wider impact on both employer and employee confidence.
This call for evidence:
- sets out the current legal framework for dismissal
- summarises the existing evidence base
- asks you to consider a number of questions and provide evidence in response
We also invite feedback on the international case studies paper about dismissal procedures of Germany, Australia and Spain, and on other relevant systems.