Skip to main content

Ms D Ahmed v Medexpress Enterprises Ltd and Others: 2201565/2021 and Others

Employment Tribunal decision.

Updates to this page

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Employment Tribunal
Published:
2 November 2021
Last updated:
21 July 2022
Show all updates

  1. Judgment

  2. Case Number: 2201565/2021 and another 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondents Ms D Ahmed v (1) Medexpress Enterprises Limited (2) Mr D Acharya (3) Ms V Lee (4) Ms K McCann (5) Mr D D’Souza JUDGMENT The claimant’s application dated 22 October 2021 for reconsideration of the judgment refusing to strike out any of the claimant’s claims is refused. REASONS 1. There is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked, because: a) The complaint made is that certain of Mr Sykes’ submissions were misrepresented; b) The submissions were summarised in the Judgment and included both written and oral submissions made by Mr Sykes and his answers to questions about his submissions. It is not the function of the judgment to rehearse the parties’ submissions in full and I can see no misrepresentation of submissions made by Mr Sykes; Case Number: 2201565/2021 and another 2 c) The claimant was successful in resisting strike out and deposit order applications; d) It would in all the circumstances not be in interests of justice to reconsider the Judgment. __________________________________ Employment Judge Joffe London Central Region 27th Oct 2021 Sent to the parties on: 27/10/2021 For the Tribunals Office

  3. First published.

Country:
England and Wales
Jurisdiction code:
Public Interest Disclosure and Race Discrimination
Decision date:
7 July 2022

Read the full decision in Ms D Ahmed v Medexpress Enterprises Ltd and Others: 2201565/2021 and Others - Reserved Judgment.

Read the full decision in Ms D Ahmed v Medexpress Enterprises Ltd and Others: 2201565/2021 and Others - Reconsideration.

Read the full decision in Ms D Ahmed v Medexpress Enterprises Ltd and Others: 2201565/2021 and Others - Dismissal.