Mr R Doroja v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration): 1800696/2019

Employment Tribunal decision.

• From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Employment Tribunal
• Published: 23 August 2019
• Last updated: 21 November 2019
  Show all updates

  1. 20 November 2019

     Case No: 1800696/2019 6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr R Doroja Respondent: Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) JUDGMENT The complaints of a claim for redundancy payment and for breach of contract (notice pay) are struck out. REASONS By a letter dated 17 October 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaints of a claim for redundancy payment and for breach of contract (notice pay) should not be struck out because: The claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 17 October 2019. It has not been actively pursued. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of a claim for redundancy payment and for breach of contract (notice pay) therefore struck out. The judgment making a protective award still stands Employment Judge Lancaster 5th November 2019

  2. 23 August 2019

     First published.

• Country: England and Wales
• Jurisdiction code: Breach of Contract, Protective Award and Redundancy
• Decision date: 5 November 2019

Read the full decision in Mr R Doroja v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration): 1800696/2019 - Rule 21.

Read the full decision in Mr R Doroja v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration): 1800696/2019 - Partial Strike Out.