Case reference: 50283
|March to May 2017 (estimate)||Receipt of any written and oral representations on the statement of objections|
|January 2017||Statement of objections issued|
|September 2016 to January 2017||Further investigation, including further information requests; CMA analysis and review of parties’ responses to further information requests; state of play meetings/calls with parties under investigation. Decision taken to issue statement of objections.|
|September 2016||Decision to proceed with the investigation|
|March to September 2016||Initial investigation: information gathering, including issuance of formal and informal information requests and parties’ responses; CMA analysis and review of parties’ responses to information requests; state of play meetings with parties under investigation. Decision taken to proceed with the investigation|
|30 March 2016||Investigation opened|
The following changes have been made to the case timetable since it was first published in March 2016:
|Date of change||Reason for change||Change made to timetable|
|20 December 2016||CMA conducting further review of information received from, and corresponding further with, the parties||Estimated timing of investigation put back by 1 to 2 months|
Statement of objections
20 January 2017: The CMA has alleged that two suppliers of cleanroom laundry services and products – Micronclean Limited (formerly known as Fenland Laundries Limited) and Berendsen Cleanroom Services Limited (formerly known as Micronclean (Newbury) Limited) – have broken competition law through a market-sharing agreement while each providing services and/or products under the ‘Micronclean’ brand.
- Press release: Cleanroom laundry businesses alleged to have broken competition law (20.1.17)
- The investigation is under Chapter I of the Competition Act 1998 (CA98).
- No conclusion should be drawn that there has been an infringement of competition law at this stage and the recipients of the statement of objections will now have an opportunity to respond to the allegations.
- The CMA will consider any representations it receives before any decision is taken as to whether competition law has in fact been infringed.
- Further detail of the CMA’s procedures in Competition Act 1998 cases is available here: CMA’s procedures in Competition Act cases.
- Changes to the timing of original entries in the case timetable will be made where the estimated timing in the original timetable changes.
Assistant project director
Simon Deeble (0203 738 6668, email@example.com)
Simon Nichols (0203 738 6368, firstname.lastname@example.org)
Senior responsible officer
Ann Pope (0203 738 6786, email@example.com)