UM v Secretary of State for the Home Department: AS/14/09/31945

Asylum Support Tribunal decision of Judge Saunders on 3 October 2014.

Effectiveness of service of a decision rejecting the appellant’s further representations. The appropriate burden of proof that should be exercised when such a decision has been made. The mere intention to submit an additional set of further representations is insufficient. Section 4 support – Regulation 3(2)(e) and application of R (NS) v First-Tier Tribunal [2009] EWHC 3819 (Admin).

Read the full decision in UM v SOS AS_14_09_31945

Published 8 February 2017