SH v Secretary of State for the Home Department: AS/06/06/13556

Asylum Support Tribunal decision of Judge Storey on 26 June 2006.

Refusal of Section 4 support. Regulation 3(2)(a) concerns the steps taken by an appellant to leave the UK. Questions of the risk of taking such steps should be addressed by making a fresh asylum claim and not considered by the Tribunal under Regulation 3(2)(a). Regulation 3(2)(a) should also not be read as reopening any question of viable route of return. Regulation 3(2)(a) not satisfied and the appellant found not to be destitute.

Read the full decision in SH v SOS AS_06_06_13556

Published 8 February 2017