Refusal of Section 4 support. Where further representations contain new material and there is a realistic prospect of success, support under regulation 3(2)(e) is required. In this case there was nothing more than a mere assertion of risk and the outstanding further representations were not sufficient to entitle the appellant to support. R (Negatu)v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 1806; LK (AA applied) Zimbabwe  UKAIT 00159 and AW v LB Croydon and AD & Y v LB Hackney and Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 2950 considered.
Read the full decision in
Published 8 February 2017