JC v Secretary of State for the Home Department: AS/06/08/13935

Asylum Support Tribunal decision of Judge Storey on 1 September 2006.

Refusal of Section 4 support. Where further representations contain new material and there is a realistic prospect of success, support under regulation 3(2)(e) is required. In this case there was nothing more than a mere assertion of risk and the outstanding further representations were not sufficient to entitle the appellant to support. R (Negatu)v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWHC 1806; LK (AA applied) Zimbabwe [2005] UKAIT 00159 and AW v LB Croydon and AD & Y v LB Hackney and Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2950 considered.

Read the full decision in JC v SOS AS_06_08_13935

Help us improve GOV.UK

Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.