Discontinuance of Section 4 support under Regulation 3(2)(e). Held that the applicant satisfied Regulation 3(2)(e) as it was currently unreasonable to expect the appellant top take steps to leave the UK to prevent her destitution and that of her son as she had been awarded leave to remain in the UK albeit of a temporary nature and with conditions attached. The appeal was remitted to the respondent in order that the respondent may consider how the appellant could prevent her destitution and that of her dependent child in the weeks immediately following her eviction from her Section 4 accommodation given that she had been granted leave to remain with no access to public funding.
Read the full decision in
Published 8 February 2017