SL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) and Carlisle City Council (HB):  UKUT 64 (AAC)
- Ministry of Justice, HM Courts & Tribunals Service, and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
- 17 February 2017
- Decision date:
- 9 February 2017
- Tribunal procedure and practice
- Tribunal procedure and practice - set aside applications
- Lane, S
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Lane on 9 February 2017.
Read the full decision in CH 2899 2016-00.
Adequacy of reasons in FTT’s decision refusing to set aside substantive decisions. Significance of rule 34(2) of Tribunal Rules (First-tier Tribunal) (SEC) Rules 2008 taken together with common law expectations: paragraphs 28 - 34; procedural error for rule 37 vs error of law or fact.
Published: 17 February 2017
Decision date: 9 February 2017