MH v London Borough of Waltham Forest (HB): [2016] UKUT 161 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Turnbull on 4 April 2016.

Read the full decision in CH/5066/5070/2014.

Judicial Summary

Inconsistent decisions by FTT that (i) claimant entitled to IS because has no capital but (ii) not entitled to housing benefit because has excess capital. Position where only the FTT’s housing benefit decision is appealed.

Help us improve GOV.UK

Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.