- Ministry of Justice, HM Courts & Tribunals Service, and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
- 9 May 2017
- Decision date:
- 25 April 2017
- Special educational needs
- Special educational needs - special educational provision - naming school and Special educational needs - special educational provision - naming school or other institution in EHC plan
- Ward, C
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Ward on 25 April 2017.
Read the full decision in HS/549/2017.
Haining v Warrington does not require to be taken into account under s9 EA1996 the cost of prosecuting a parent who breaches school attendance legislation
Published: 9 May 2017
Decision date: 25 April 2017
Categories: Special educational needs
Judges: Ward, C