Skip to main content

KW v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2017] UKUT 54 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Poynter on 31 January 2017.

Read the full decision in CPIP/449/2016.

Judicial Summary

The Secretary of State accepts that a commode is an “aid” to manage incontinence The Secretary of State accepts that PIP is to be assessed with reference to the individual circumstances of the claimant