KW v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2017] UKUT 54 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Poynter on 31 January 2017.

Read the full decision in CPIP/449/2016.

Judicial Summary

The Secretary of State accepts that a commode is an “aid” to manage incontinence The Secretary of State accepts that PIP is to be assessed with reference to the individual circumstances of the claimant

Help us improve GOV.UK

Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.