AA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2018] UKUT 339 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Hemingway on 12 October 2018.

Read the full decision in CPIP/703/2018.

Judicial Summary

Does the “person” in mobility descriptor 1d and 1f have to be playing an active role in preventing overwhelming psychological distress from occurring when a claimant is attempting to follow the route of a journey or is mere passive presence sufficient?

Published 9 November 2018