South Sudan: The Politics of Delay
This memo examines the challenges and opportunities arising from the postponement of the formation of Transitional Government of National Unity
Abstract
International sponsors of South Sudan’s peace process should respond creatively to the delay in forming the Transitional Government of National Unity (TGNU). An intemperate response, which might include a new, immovable and near deadline or rapidly imposing sanctions, runs two risks. First, it jeopardizes the ceasefire—the truly substantial achievement of the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS). Second, a deadline could be an opportunity for the government of Pres. Salva Kiir Mayardit to reinforce its authoritarianism. The 100-day extension provides an opportunity to put in place inclusive processes to address South Sudan’s governance crisis.
This memo uses 3 concepts to frame the challenges and opportunities arising from the recent (and recurrent) postponement of the formation of TGNU.
This work is part of the Conflict Research Programme managed by the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and funded by the UK Department for International Development
Citation
Alex de Waal, Alan Boswell, David Deng, Rachel Ibreck, Matthew Benson and Jan Pospisil (2020) South Sudan: The Politics of Delay. Conflict Research Programme Policy Memo. Conflict Research Programme, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Link
South Sudan: The Politics of Delay (PDF, 475KB)