Direct and Indirect Effects of Malawi's Public Works Programme on Food Security

In this evaluation of the Social Action Fund, a government-operated programme is used to estimate effects on food security and use of fertilizer

Abstract

Labor-intensive public works programs are important social protection tools in low-income settings, intended to supplement the income of poor households and improve public infrastructure. In this evaluation of the Malawi Social Action Fund, an at-scale, government-operated program, across- and within-village randomization is used to estimate effects on food security and use of fertilizer. There is no evidence that the program improves food security and suggestive evidence of negative spillovers to untreated households. These disappointing results hold even under modifications to the design of the program to offer work during the lean rather than harvest season or increase the frequency of payments. These findings stand in contrast to those from large PWPs in India and Ethiopia, and serves as a reminder that PWPs will not always have significant and measurable welfare effects.

This research is part of the Gender, Growth and Labour Markets in Low-Income Countries programme

Citation

Beegle, K. Galasso, E. & Goldberg, J. (2017). Direct and Indirect Effects of Malawi’s Public Works Programme on Food Security. GLMLIC Working Paper No. 24. Available at: https://g2lm-lic.iza.org/publications/wp/wp24/

Direct and Indirect Effects of Malawi’s Public Works Programme on Food Security

Published 1 February 2017